diff options
| author | Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> | 2016-08-19 00:05:59 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2016-08-18 23:06:25 +0000 |
| commit | b3e32fd68f1444b8e8d6366f7a200531ad10a34b (patch) | |
| tree | f19cf789bd66921f41b146ede716470c10fcfd58 | |
| parent | f8178d3b99e3710d07941a4235219553538249a9 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-b3e32fd68f1444b8e8d6366f7a200531ad10a34b.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-b3e32fd68f1444b8e8d6366f7a200531ad10a34b.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Status updates for BIP 9, 68, 112, and 113
| -rw-r--r-- | 15/60f316a287e675a20fc113949fb00646e79299 | 203 |
1 files changed, 203 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/15/60f316a287e675a20fc113949fb00646e79299 b/15/60f316a287e675a20fc113949fb00646e79299 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bae99aada --- /dev/null +++ b/15/60f316a287e675a20fc113949fb00646e79299 @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD4598A5 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:06:25 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com + [209.85.215.51]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0499107 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:06:21 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l89so21618854lfi.1 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:06:21 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc; bh=JtdDxqbzbaMc0diseQO89Xn00+9bPCnubxwacrT4/Ec=; + b=GX9KlSeaa0iwr3JedEoLqxn9FCeCSV/pbPMPCcgvK15EFVzeWfPTRq52Yvs9CKHDWW + o+bjWpIiIoO0RN4qeD2ZsQxlX+YNtF5UZO6wlEA9k5ELgZJLcbdN5xw8i+bmIvLtjRAE + eKATalbH19Liy2P5CPh2gkbTZHOJGFHG/v+wcHxljA2YUiSXwyz0T89JVAZI0QAv9CoT + WIXB/PJeRfzCLjn0j0UZ6u2DZqSuJaZLzcELS0vyrEltWxHb6Vhv2vut4FvM4Duo3jbG + +l3Ju6S4iZCKVUPvJccXF3kOcskxwMNNP1EnSABZQwveGZmmsjqtf0STWBvjg4/baTx2 + rbwg== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date + :message-id:subject:to:cc; + bh=JtdDxqbzbaMc0diseQO89Xn00+9bPCnubxwacrT4/Ec=; + b=VP9bPGcjdh/DUw7hL0+zzIUO4quyzMzyGa7BgBx3ygX/YV8KquDCjezIdurk2SjM8U + jAYdUR5HQfmg5Hggd0MYEBI/HtYYc77F6fQDCvorNPcw9h28+djdKMSLNLgkjF0+kxLz + tzMAS1mH2HFIu8eflzLSX2m4xA4Fa74/DrEAmTHt6dGRWlzn0t3Ow6ptI0zWmLtXYhHG + IHhj+r0wfQVvUe7Ja2deFPf4xFc5ckCxBuPH95L0lmA6wG1qxoiDa+1Sk5yurF4HXYHu + 8Gesl20VvbaK2U1oM23uZoy+9PAgvJiUgg/Bgif+2zfmiizzgrABczoi4MaDq5sX2aOH + o9pw== +X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutWMyOysOaJqr9kxLd5cX/K1Oh8vizLOXRvH+WIwxyYK572erzWviPOKR5W2YnmVNMhBwXFusYv/fymGQ== +X-Received: by 10.25.89.2 with SMTP id n2mr1110109lfb.208.1471561580034; Thu, + 18 Aug 2016 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.25.24.153 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:05:59 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <201607151531.00058.luke@dashjr.org> +References: <201607151531.00058.luke@dashjr.org> +From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> +Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:05:59 +0100 +Message-ID: <CADJgMzucAsUkfs=K8aL8qeCoSNzMJxPsx7dd6dmAcsMy-Hj=5Q@mail.gmail.com> +To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114128363e42d6053a60a1aa +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, + HK_RANDOM_FROM, + HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:07:15 +0000 +Cc: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>, + Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>, + Thomas Kerin <me@thomaskerin.io>, github@dcousens.com +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Status updates for BIP 9, 68, 112, and 113 +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:06:25 -0000 + +--001a114128363e42d6053a60a1aa +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +Fine by me to update BIP68 and BIP112 to Final status. The forks have +activated. + +On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote: + +> Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should +> progress to +> Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear +> on +> whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals +> requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like process +> BIPs. Background of this discussion is at: +> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/413 +> (Discussion on the GitHub BIPs repo is *NOT* recommended, hence bringing +> this +> topic to the mailing list) +> +> Reviewing the criteria for status changes, my opinion is that: +> - BIPs 68, 112, 113, and 141 are themselves implementations of BIP 9 +> -- therefore, BIP 9 falls under the Draft/Accepted/Final class +> - BIPs 68, 112, and 113 have been deployed to the network successfully +> -- therefore, BIP 9 has satisfied the conditions of not only Accepted +> status, +> but also Final status +> -- therefore, BIPs 68, 112, and 113 also ought to be Final status +> +> If there are no objections, I plan to update the status to Final for BIPs +> 9, +> 68, 112, and 113 in one month. Since all four BIPs are currently Draft, I +> also +> need at least one author from each BIP to sign-off on promoting them to +> (and +> beyond) Accepted. +> +> BIP 9: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> +> Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +> Greg Maxwell <greg@xiph.org> +> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> +> +> BIP 68: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org> +> BtcDrak <btcdrak@gmail.com> +> Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com> +> kinoshitajona <kinoshitajona@gmail.com> +> +> BIP 112: BtcDrak <btcdrak@gmail.com> +> Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org> +> Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> +> +> BIP 113: Thomas Kerin <me@thomaskerin.io> +> Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org> +> + +--001a114128363e42d6053a60a1aa +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">Fine by me to update BIP6= +8 and BIP112 to Final status. The forks have activated.</span><br><div clas= +s=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:= +30 PM, Luke Dashjr <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org"= + target=3D"_blank">luke@dashjr.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla= +ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pa= +dding-left:1ex">Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9= + should progress to<br> +Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear = +on<br> +whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals<br= +> +requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like process<b= +r> +BIPs. Background of this discussion is at:<br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/413" rel=3D"n= +oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bip<wbr>s/pull/413<= +/a><br> +(Discussion on the GitHub BIPs repo is *NOT* recommended, hence bringing th= +is<br> +topic to the mailing list)<br> +<br> +Reviewing the criteria for status changes, my opinion is that:<br> +- BIPs 68, 112, 113, and 141 are themselves implementations of BIP 9<br> +-- therefore, BIP 9 falls under the Draft/Accepted/Final class<br> +- BIPs 68, 112, and 113 have been deployed to the network successfully<br> +-- therefore, BIP 9 has satisfied the conditions of not only Accepted statu= +s,<br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0but also Final status<br> +-- therefore, BIPs 68, 112, and 113 also ought to be Final status<br> +<br> +If there are no objections, I plan to update the status to Final for BIPs 9= +,<br> +68, 112, and 113 in one month. Since all four BIPs are currently Draft, I a= +lso<br> +need at least one author from each BIP to sign-off on promoting them to (an= +d<br> +beyond) Accepted.<br> +<br> +BIP=C2=A0 =C2=A09: Pieter Wuille <<a href=3D"mailto:pieter.wuille@gmail.= +com" target=3D"_blank">pieter.wuille@gmail.com</a>><br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Peter Todd <<a href=3D"mailto:pete@pet= +ertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>><br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Greg Maxwell <<a href=3D"mailto:greg@x= +iph.org" target=3D"_blank">greg@xiph.org</a>><br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Rusty Russell <<a href=3D"mailto:rusty= +@rustcorp.com.au" target=3D"_blank">rusty@rustcorp.com.au</a>><br> +<br> +BIP=C2=A0 68: Mark Friedenbach <<a href=3D"mailto:mark@friedenbach.org" = +target=3D"_blank">mark@friedenbach.org</a>><br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0BtcDrak <<a href=3D"mailto:btcdrak@gma= +il.com" target=3D"_blank">btcdrak@gmail.com</a>><br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Nicolas Dorier <<a href=3D"mailto:nico= +las.dorier@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">nicolas.dorier@gmail.com</a>><br= +> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0kinoshitajona <<a href=3D"mailto:kinos= +hitajona@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">kinoshitajona@gmail.com</a>><br> +<br> +BIP 112: BtcDrak <<a href=3D"mailto:btcdrak@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank"= +>btcdrak@gmail.com</a>><br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Mark Friedenbach <<a href=3D"mailto:ma= +rk@friedenbach.org" target=3D"_blank">mark@friedenbach.org</a>><br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Eric Lombrozo <<a href=3D"mailto:elomb= +rozo@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">elombrozo@gmail.com</a>><br> +<br> +BIP 113: Thomas Kerin <<a href=3D"mailto:me@thomaskerin.io" target=3D"_b= +lank">me@thomaskerin.io</a>><br> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Mark Friedenbach <<a href=3D"mailto:ma= +rk@friedenbach.org" target=3D"_blank">mark@friedenbach.org</a>><br> +</blockquote></div><br></div></div> + +--001a114128363e42d6053a60a1aa-- + |