diff options
| author | Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name> | 2015-06-20 14:17:18 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-06-20 18:17:27 +0000 |
| commit | aef5450cd6b23ae630f84f94cf327d2cef032932 (patch) | |
| tree | d625f1cb24c481286074536866b28a639ce39429 | |
| parent | 8dd0c9141fadeea9b9bc40aaf70410f772f707aa (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-aef5450cd6b23ae630f84f94cf327d2cef032932.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-aef5450cd6b23ae630f84f94cf327d2cef032932.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Hard fork via miner vote
| -rw-r--r-- | 15/7537a6ae8c54a8f9a7d5631a39e023a567d135 | 61 |
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/15/7537a6ae8c54a8f9a7d5631a39e023a567d135 b/15/7537a6ae8c54a8f9a7d5631a39e023a567d135 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4addb3071 --- /dev/null +++ b/15/7537a6ae8c54a8f9a7d5631a39e023a567d135 @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <bip@mattwhitlock.name>) id 1Z6NKZ-0002DE-46 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:17:27 +0000 +X-ACL-Warn: +Received: from resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.42]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1Z6NKY-0004Zi-Br + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:17:27 +0000 +Received: from resomta-ch2-16v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.112]) + by resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net with comcast + id iiHM1q0012S2Q5R01iHMxG; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:17:21 +0000 +Received: from crushinator.localnet + ([IPv6:2601:186:c000:825e:e9f4:8901:87c7:24a0]) + by resomta-ch2-16v.sys.comcast.net with comcast + id iiHK1q0054eLRLv01iHLcH; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:17:20 +0000 +From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name> +To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> +Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:17:18 -0400 +Message-ID: <3848127.0flgkf9F4i@crushinator> +User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/3.18.12-gentoo; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) +In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBgmGcWF6YHg0rrq8AK3V323fw9mvms3u=RzuP=5j5v6hw@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAPg+sBijQ0Q9U00hUaotYujqW8M+v1ED+PV+ap2g7b0Z4=RNSA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAFVRnyoqdbhGB1LVcawMqviq4ExvoOMM7CfFKSAtDgcZBc1TKw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAPg+sBgmGcWF6YHg0rrq8AK3V323fw9mvms3u=RzuP=5j5v6hw@mail.gmail.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + no trust [69.252.207.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1Z6NKY-0004Zi-Br +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Hard fork via miner vote +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:17:27 -0000 + +On Saturday, 20 June 2015, at 8:11 pm, Pieter Wuille wrote: +> you want full nodes that have not noticed the fork to fail rather than see a slow but otherwise functional chain. + +Isn't that what the Alert mechanism is for? If these nodes continue running despite an alert telling them they're outdated, then it must be intentional. + + |