summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>2012-07-09 16:44:50 -0400
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2012-07-09 20:45:00 +0000
commitab33f1e2cf4efa3e28e947b35c77b1a5b627991b (patch)
tree2c77c7447fea8f9be8896e824b0bfe106ea24bd0
parent9fab11a28f3dbbc5b6235ca531ea0032b4c545e7 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-ab33f1e2cf4efa3e28e947b35c77b1a5b627991b.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-ab33f1e2cf4efa3e28e947b35c77b1a5b627991b.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Random order for clients page
-rw-r--r--03/3c66f33ca59a3e3aafef037ecd69bfa84e655c84
1 files changed, 84 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/03/3c66f33ca59a3e3aafef037ecd69bfa84e655c b/03/3c66f33ca59a3e3aafef037ecd69bfa84e655c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e01c58bb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/03/3c66f33ca59a3e3aafef037ecd69bfa84e655c
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <jgarzik@exmulti.com>) id 1SoKpI-0007us-M5
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Mon, 09 Jul 2012 20:45:00 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175])
+ by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1SoKpF-0003jN-Ld
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Mon, 09 Jul 2012 20:45:00 +0000
+Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5so17826261lbo.34
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=google.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date
+ :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
+ bh=hrHZ0AI7U1F8pjv4uKPIzJiz9e/RM0RpsZgu4cfweB4=;
+ b=l/jF2sKC6i24ud9D23a62+ZNZCxmzuQaV1xoEkT43dgLhItm7VJBlsjxjW1pQYCQ3a
+ ByAA/qIo+F++un50soqPqeGt2dLI1p5cTpiZsD9lwNHEj4tBXEQhT+jqIa89AWFABTsw
+ Q7nI6IjFrLSkoe66BPYhMCxoegR+QUMmxJB7Sr/G9mrqUY529h1BI5sfqQH3eyIPLImw
+ +57SdiVu0manLOxOnt8F34/yomup50lMOy87eY4/gpkDRgbT1Vsh7ob1P5+D8p1LFslB
+ 7twSdsZ1tD2HUMPcdmPOY+5RPIOsRPAAcS6Af2/PuBgW8ZWfk01dAd1u1Q2MR9I799Yg
+ sqWA==
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.112.49.230 with SMTP id x6mr19313120lbn.86.1341866691004; Mon,
+ 09 Jul 2012 13:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.114.63.165 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Originating-IP: [99.43.178.25]
+In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgRd0gqrxXs4Le6nydYBaG7EO=T7FrtX6QZpg3aJtAxSvg@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <1341849295.94710.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+ <CAAS2fgRd0gqrxXs4Le6nydYBaG7EO=T7FrtX6QZpg3aJtAxSvg@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:44:50 -0400
+Message-ID: <CA+8xBpcXe8evJpmJOMGjhrBNkcThu6A9uUiCjg0uqr+JokQjhw@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
+To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmlmXz4ggwg79rRM3P5eDkydlp43iQSybyXyOsdltWtKIgT2V9aIE6WNyYw+bWKArVtn/ep
+X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+X-Headers-End: 1SoKpF-0003jN-Ld
+Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
+ <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Random order for clients page
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 20:45:00 -0000
+
+On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
+> If you had authored this as a pull request rather than making the
+> change unilaterally I would have recommended leaving it so the
+> reference client was always first. I also would have suggested that it
+> use JS randomization instead of jekyll in order to get more even
+> coverage, though I think thats a more minor point.
+
+Agreed, and this would be why I support revert -- pull requests are
+for anything non-trivial. This practice of pull requests clearly
+should be followed in the case of controversial changes.
+
+> Some people were concerned when this page was created that it would
+> just be a source of useless disputes. I think its becoming clear that
+> this is the case. I think the cost of dealing with this page is
+> starting to exceed the benefit it provides and we should probably
+> consider removing it.
+
+Agreed.
+--
+Jeff Garzik
+exMULTI, Inc.
+jgarzik@exmulti.com
+
+