+Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]

+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)

+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)

+ (envelope-from <thomasV1@gmx.de>) id 1RrvdZ-0002wT-Kc

+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;

+ Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:07:29 +0000

+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmx.de

+ designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender)

+ client-ip=213.165.64.23; envelope-from=thomasV1@gmx.de;

+ helo=mailout-de.gmx.net;

+Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23])

+ by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)

+ id 1RrvdU-0005Vp-3M for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;

+ Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:07:29 +0000

+Received: (qmail 18615 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jan 2012 18:07:18 -0000

+Received: from 152.81.11.206 by www005.gmx.net with HTTP;

+ Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:16 +0100 (CET)

+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

+Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:16 +0100

+From: thomasV1@gmx.de

+Message-ID: <20120130180716.261910@gmx.net>

+MIME-Version: 1.0

+To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net

+X-Authenticated: #19670841

+X-Flags: 0001

+X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange)

+X-Priority: 3

+X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19P+FF6Q59PvDgYEvWF6ezLmcjLNynk8l97XYx+Ib

+ rTkgK0rR/Ot1FgJTxuSo33jhIgVeheoFBq6A==

+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

+X-GMX-UID: A7lUbysHeSEqUFhER3UhvfN+IGRvbwB9

+X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-)

+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.

+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

+ -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,

+ no trust [213.165.64.23 listed in list.dnswl.org]

+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for

+ sender-domain

+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider

+ (thomasv1[at]gmx.de)

+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record

+ 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in

+ digit (thomasv1[at]gmx.de)

+ 0.0 FAKE_REPLY_C FAKE_REPLY_C

+X-Headers-End: 1RrvdU-0005Vp-3M

+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20)

+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net

+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9

+Precedence: list

+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>

+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>

+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>

+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>

+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>

+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>

+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:07:29 -0000

+

+I too support BIP21 over BIP20. However, I do not understand the "Sending money via private key" feature; in which situation would such a URI be useful?

+

+Also, I posted a proposal in the forum, to extend the URI syntax with signatures. The goal would be to provide a proof of identity of the recipient; genjix told me that it would be more appropriate to post that here.

+

+My proposal is described here: http://ecdsa.org/bitcoin_URIs.html

+

+My original forum post is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=58534.msg689190#msg689190

+

+--

+Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir

+belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

+

+