diff options
author | Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> | 2015-09-04 18:21:15 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-09-04 18:21:26 +0000 |
commit | a3d5e557363aed5542a031270c114b7b325cefeb (patch) | |
tree | 875e471c6dcba2ebf7413fb72b06a3796e4d9578 | |
parent | 36b8c716c36de711af848c0bfb1f041ae35a6a70 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-a3d5e557363aed5542a031270c114b7b325cefeb.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-a3d5e557363aed5542a031270c114b7b325cefeb.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC: HD Bitmessage address derivation based on BIP-43
-rw-r--r-- | b1/43fd864c5dd6e99e69ebc0549c9cfb46e6c32f | 76 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b1/43fd864c5dd6e99e69ebc0549c9cfb46e6c32f b/b1/43fd864c5dd6e99e69ebc0549c9cfb46e6c32f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7685bcbab --- /dev/null +++ b/b1/43fd864c5dd6e99e69ebc0549c9cfb46e6c32f @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C02105A + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:21:26 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A021106 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:21:26 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown + [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) + (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) + by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D7CB10801BA; + Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:21:17 +0000 (UTC) +X-Hashcash: 1:25:150904:justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org::y8QdGNjrqlMU0CiF:l4iL +X-Hashcash: 1:25:150904:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::ez=hkganqs2VL829:BGqQ +From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> +To: Justus Ranvier <justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org> +Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:21:15 +0000 +User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.1-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) +References: <CAHabJ+N3Tr5FtStH6Msmj3d8EsvjeTEV6FhSEiizLVs=5ZvCfw@mail.gmail.com> + <201509040006.06430.luke@dashjr.org> + <55E9D980.5020901@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org> +In-Reply-To: <55E9D980.5020901@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org> +X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F +X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F +X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: Text/Plain; + charset="iso-8859-15" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Message-Id: <201509041821.16309.luke@dashjr.org> +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC: HD Bitmessage address derivation based on + BIP-43 +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:21:27 -0000 + +On Friday, September 04, 2015 5:48:48 PM Justus Ranvier wrote: +> On 09/03/2015 07:06 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> > Since BIP 43 is still a draft, I propose modifying it to refer non- +> > +> > Bitcoin purpose codes to the SLIP repository: +> > https://doc.satoshilabs.com/slips/ +> +> What benefit is created by delegating the BIP-43 namespace management to +> that company in particular? + +Feel free to create a company-independent repository instead. +Although I don't think SLIPs are intended to be biased toward their company. + +> BIP-43 as it is currently composed provides the convenient feature of +> purpose codes matching the BIP number. Moving purpose codes to a +> separate namespace add complexity to its usage for no discernible benefit. + +This is not Bitcoin's problem... Polluting the BIP repository with N non- +Bitcoin related specifications would be. + +Luke + |