summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLuke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>2015-09-04 18:21:15 +0000
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-09-04 18:21:26 +0000
commita3d5e557363aed5542a031270c114b7b325cefeb (patch)
tree875e471c6dcba2ebf7413fb72b06a3796e4d9578
parent36b8c716c36de711af848c0bfb1f041ae35a6a70 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-a3d5e557363aed5542a031270c114b7b325cefeb.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-a3d5e557363aed5542a031270c114b7b325cefeb.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC: HD Bitmessage address derivation based on BIP-43
-rw-r--r--b1/43fd864c5dd6e99e69ebc0549c9cfb46e6c32f76
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b1/43fd864c5dd6e99e69ebc0549c9cfb46e6c32f b/b1/43fd864c5dd6e99e69ebc0549c9cfb46e6c32f
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7685bcbab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b1/43fd864c5dd6e99e69ebc0549c9cfb46e6c32f
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C02105A
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:21:26 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A021106
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:21:26 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
+ [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6])
+ (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
+ by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D7CB10801BA;
+ Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:21:17 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Hashcash: 1:25:150904:justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org::y8QdGNjrqlMU0CiF:l4iL
+X-Hashcash: 1:25:150904:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::ez=hkganqs2VL829:BGqQ
+From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
+To: Justus Ranvier <justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org>
+Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:21:15 +0000
+User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.1-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
+References: <CAHabJ+N3Tr5FtStH6Msmj3d8EsvjeTEV6FhSEiizLVs=5ZvCfw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <201509040006.06430.luke@dashjr.org>
+ <55E9D980.5020901@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org>
+In-Reply-To: <55E9D980.5020901@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org>
+X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
+X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
+X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: Text/Plain;
+ charset="iso-8859-15"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Message-Id: <201509041821.16309.luke@dashjr.org>
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC: HD Bitmessage address derivation based on
+ BIP-43
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:21:27 -0000
+
+On Friday, September 04, 2015 5:48:48 PM Justus Ranvier wrote:
+> On 09/03/2015 07:06 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
+> > Since BIP 43 is still a draft, I propose modifying it to refer non-
+> >
+> > Bitcoin purpose codes to the SLIP repository:
+> > https://doc.satoshilabs.com/slips/
+>
+> What benefit is created by delegating the BIP-43 namespace management to
+> that company in particular?
+
+Feel free to create a company-independent repository instead.
+Although I don't think SLIPs are intended to be biased toward their company.
+
+> BIP-43 as it is currently composed provides the convenient feature of
+> purpose codes matching the BIP number. Moving purpose codes to a
+> separate namespace add complexity to its usage for no discernible benefit.
+
+This is not Bitcoin's problem... Polluting the BIP repository with N non-
+Bitcoin related specifications would be.
+
+Luke
+