summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>2015-12-19 09:43:10 -0800
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-12-19 17:43:18 +0000
commita3a91645b593c584122636ab6228a7cd393ace1d (patch)
treeb1108a7e737718f3149be4179efdc2baef06f2c5
parent08b816f6c50bc548431951dff2e246dfa8695c0c (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-a3a91645b593c584122636ab6228a7cd393ace1d.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-a3a91645b593c584122636ab6228a7cd393ace1d.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated witness softfork with moderate adoption has very small block size effect
-rw-r--r--64/9d8ef901e489a7cda4d740c7afebeaf15c0a98105
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/64/9d8ef901e489a7cda4d740c7afebeaf15c0a98 b/64/9d8ef901e489a7cda4d740c7afebeaf15c0a98
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a659c015d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/64/9d8ef901e489a7cda4d740c7afebeaf15c0a98
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F42FA0
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:18 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from outmail148111.authsmtp.net (outmail148111.authsmtp.net
+ [62.13.148.111])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2502D141
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232])
+ by punt23.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tBJHhGh0007487;
+ Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:16 GMT
+Received: from muck ([24.114.24.241]) (authenticated bits=128)
+ by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tBJHhAb0037868
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
+ Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:15 GMT
+Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:43:10 -0800
+From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
+To: jl2012 <jl2012@xbt.hk>
+Message-ID: <20151219174309.GB30640@muck>
+References: <b19eb676c18ba451605cb02159541dd9@xbt.hk>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS"
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <b19eb676c18ba451605cb02159541dd9@xbt.hk>
+X-Server-Quench: fbe18f26-a677-11e5-829e-00151795d556
+X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
+ http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
+X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
+ aAdMdwsUHFAXAgsB AmMbWlNeVF57WGU7 aQ5PbARZfEhKQQdu
+ UVdMSlVNFUssc2Z5 Xm9MUhlxcA1AcDB0 Z0RmECYJCUVyI0R7
+ Xx9SEmobZGY1bX0X UkkNagNUcQZLeRZA PlV6Uj1vNG8XDSg5
+ AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWxu Tw4XIF0bXUsHViE9 WxYPBi5nBkoLWys0
+ NR9uNV8AHA4UNUk/ K1I9VBoRPxgKFgxZ GSMFACZCb0cMXTtj
+ FgZTWUpWGjlaSiQU GRw6L1dFDDJfUTYw
+X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706
+X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
+X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.24.241/587
+X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
+ anti-virus system.
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated witness softfork with moderate
+ adoption has very small block size effect
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:18 -0000
+
+
+--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:49:25AM -0500, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev wrote:
+> I have done some calculation for the effect of a SW softfork on the
+> actual total block size.
+
+Note how the fact that segwit needs client-side adoption to enable an
+actual blocksize increase can be a good thing: it's a clear sign that
+the ecosystem as a whole has opted-into a blocksize increase.
+
+Not as good as a direct proof-of-stake vote, and somewhat coercive as a
+vote as you pay lower fees, but it's an interesting side-effect.
+
+--=20
+'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
+00000000000000000188b6321da7feae60d74c7b0becbdab3b1a0bd57f10947d
+
+--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+Content-Description: Digital signature
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+iQGrBAEBCACVBQJWdZcqXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw
+MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMTg4YjYzMjFkYTdmZWFlNjBkNzRjN2IwYmVjYmRhYjNi
+MWEwYmQ1N2YxMDk0N2QvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0
+ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udy+QAf/ZjClqiE2it2GVkhi+dFg8Grq
+pjjjlPMDxmk3y/zGhbHnISdcUJydXIUB3TKkjYCCNMTCI3jiZ8pKvZMMWIX6XJND
+XHSCImQEnNZwQbTzfd5+Ppvkdn8L9dYor8T9ayBF7s2Q1DTxCsI/Plgxb7nc5yFJ
+NHu72LNJC+2bAQvRf5SMnQQXz/IoLQVd1yVO8vFCAt2uz7Dg80wVXauXSI8dkqWR
+y6pBS8dwanjxrw7MkfnhKqiwXYm7dwIqV88LSE53KQQe/e96vgfD2SpuFUHjYv3p
+rwkh44ejm9fvyfzCF4YO3QDQMehgVPfHORaNEr0qWrYn37p1CXe0jKbinqCErg==
+=aFh2
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS--
+