diff options
author | Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> | 2015-12-19 09:43:10 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-12-19 17:43:18 +0000 |
commit | a3a91645b593c584122636ab6228a7cd393ace1d (patch) | |
tree | b1108a7e737718f3149be4179efdc2baef06f2c5 | |
parent | 08b816f6c50bc548431951dff2e246dfa8695c0c (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-a3a91645b593c584122636ab6228a7cd393ace1d.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-a3a91645b593c584122636ab6228a7cd393ace1d.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated witness softfork with moderate adoption has very small block size effect
-rw-r--r-- | 64/9d8ef901e489a7cda4d740c7afebeaf15c0a98 | 105 |
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/64/9d8ef901e489a7cda4d740c7afebeaf15c0a98 b/64/9d8ef901e489a7cda4d740c7afebeaf15c0a98 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a659c015d --- /dev/null +++ b/64/9d8ef901e489a7cda4d740c7afebeaf15c0a98 @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F42FA0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:18 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from outmail148111.authsmtp.net (outmail148111.authsmtp.net + [62.13.148.111]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2502D141 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:17 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232]) + by punt23.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tBJHhGh0007487; + Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:16 GMT +Received: from muck ([24.114.24.241]) (authenticated bits=128) + by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tBJHhAb0037868 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); + Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:15 GMT +Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:43:10 -0800 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: jl2012 <jl2012@xbt.hk> +Message-ID: <20151219174309.GB30640@muck> +References: <b19eb676c18ba451605cb02159541dd9@xbt.hk> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <b19eb676c18ba451605cb02159541dd9@xbt.hk> +X-Server-Quench: fbe18f26-a677-11e5-829e-00151795d556 +X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: + http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse +X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR + aAdMdwsUHFAXAgsB AmMbWlNeVF57WGU7 aQ5PbARZfEhKQQdu + UVdMSlVNFUssc2Z5 Xm9MUhlxcA1AcDB0 Z0RmECYJCUVyI0R7 + Xx9SEmobZGY1bX0X UkkNagNUcQZLeRZA PlV6Uj1vNG8XDSg5 + AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWxu Tw4XIF0bXUsHViE9 WxYPBi5nBkoLWys0 + NR9uNV8AHA4UNUk/ K1I9VBoRPxgKFgxZ GSMFACZCb0cMXTtj + FgZTWUpWGjlaSiQU GRw6L1dFDDJfUTYw +X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706 +X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) +X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.24.241/587 +X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own + anti-virus system. +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated witness softfork with moderate + adoption has very small block size effect +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:43:18 -0000 + + +--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:49:25AM -0500, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> I have done some calculation for the effect of a SW softfork on the +> actual total block size. + +Note how the fact that segwit needs client-side adoption to enable an +actual blocksize increase can be a good thing: it's a clear sign that +the ecosystem as a whole has opted-into a blocksize increase. + +Not as good as a direct proof-of-stake vote, and somewhat coercive as a +vote as you pay lower fees, but it's an interesting side-effect. + +--=20 +'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org +00000000000000000188b6321da7feae60d74c7b0becbdab3b1a0bd57f10947d + +--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQGrBAEBCACVBQJWdZcqXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw +MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMTg4YjYzMjFkYTdmZWFlNjBkNzRjN2IwYmVjYmRhYjNi +MWEwYmQ1N2YxMDk0N2QvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 +ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udy+QAf/ZjClqiE2it2GVkhi+dFg8Grq +pjjjlPMDxmk3y/zGhbHnISdcUJydXIUB3TKkjYCCNMTCI3jiZ8pKvZMMWIX6XJND +XHSCImQEnNZwQbTzfd5+Ppvkdn8L9dYor8T9ayBF7s2Q1DTxCsI/Plgxb7nc5yFJ +NHu72LNJC+2bAQvRf5SMnQQXz/IoLQVd1yVO8vFCAt2uz7Dg80wVXauXSI8dkqWR +y6pBS8dwanjxrw7MkfnhKqiwXYm7dwIqV88LSE53KQQe/e96vgfD2SpuFUHjYv3p +rwkh44ejm9fvyfzCF4YO3QDQMehgVPfHORaNEr0qWrYn37p1CXe0jKbinqCErg== +=aFh2 +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS-- + |