summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>2013-07-22 16:44:59 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2013-07-22 14:45:10 +0000
commita320b558922be1cf80362325061de6bd8c6e3ccd (patch)
treee4fe685c1474e8efe35fdaca89dae41509292adc
parentf2d3b8753bd0153d6d777d205286fe481aa5c7be (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-a320b558922be1cf80362325061de6bd8c6e3ccd.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-a320b558922be1cf80362325061de6bd8c6e3ccd.zip
[Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Standard for private keys with birth timestamp
-rw-r--r--c5/e858dd5d75937b978a99009aeacc4f367e407a72
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/c5/e858dd5d75937b978a99009aeacc4f367e407a b/c5/e858dd5d75937b978a99009aeacc4f367e407a
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2a1141757
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c5/e858dd5d75937b978a99009aeacc4f367e407a
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <pw@vps7135.xlshosting.net>) id 1V1HMM-0005bi-BH
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:45:10 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from vps7135.xlshosting.net ([178.18.90.41])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ id 1V1HMH-0008Mq-J9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:45:10 +0000
+Received: by vps7135.xlshosting.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
+ id AA48033CE09; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:44:59 +0200 (CEST)
+Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:44:59 +0200
+From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
+To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Message-ID: <20130722144458.GA22993@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
+X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
+ 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
+ CUSTOM_MED
+ -1.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit,
+ and not from a mailing list
+X-Headers-End: 1V1HMH-0008Mq-J9
+Subject: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Standard for private keys with birth
+ timestamp
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:45:10 -0000
+
+Hello,
+
+I should have brought up this suggestion before, as there seems to be relevant other work.
+
+I'd like to propose encoding keys data (whatever type) with a birth timestamp as:
+ * <serialized key>@<unix timestamp in decimal>
+
+The reason for not incorporating this inside the key serialization (for example BIP32), is because
+birth timestamps are more generally a property of an address, rather than the key it is derived from.
+For one, it is useful for non-extended standard serialized private keys, but for P2SH addresses,
+the "private key" is really the actual scriptPubKey, but birth data is equally useful for this.
+
+Reason for choosing the '@' character: it's not present in the base58, hex, or base64 encodings that
+are typically used for key/script data.
+
+One downside is that this means no checksum-protection for the timestamp, but the advantage is
+increased genericity. It's also longer than using a binary encoding, but this is an optional
+part anyway, and I think "human typing" is already fairly hard anyway.
+
+--
+Pieter
+
+
+