summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc>2015-05-14 01:46:04 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-05-14 00:38:27 +0000
commita2de3bf5d16035540a0007be545085f0ffae3ab5 (patch)
tree4d8016da70c958caa882db771623b8c1013a8679
parentbe9a83dbf50305ad7cbc54fb3befd9deeb8d31df (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-a2de3bf5d16035540a0007be545085f0ffae3ab5.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-a2de3bf5d16035540a0007be545085f0ffae3ab5.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Long-term mining incentives
-rw-r--r--18/a0d7d9b1475f0391d8ceec2f97a6e5a903332096
1 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/18/a0d7d9b1475f0391d8ceec2f97a6e5a9033320 b/18/a0d7d9b1475f0391d8ceec2f97a6e5a9033320
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..326812cab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/18/a0d7d9b1475f0391d8ceec2f97a6e5a9033320
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <jtimon@jtimon.cc>) id 1YshAR-0006zV-Fp
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Thu, 14 May 2015 00:38:27 +0000
+Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182])
+ by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1YshAQ-0003Ej-Ny
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Thu, 14 May 2015 00:38:27 +0000
+Received: by obfe9 with SMTP id e9so42512564obf.1
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Wed, 13 May 2015 17:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
+ :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
+ bh=LMtghqKc8v+CT2ZuWCFl93Ia427RdskJKN5Xd8xkOAg=;
+ b=Og7ikCLgfhJBZa3pYCNhm+/5s0O5z5hkQPKJH1UnFnWKSk73sShDf8PGKr2ZFa6JxP
+ EyZIKfZIXK65g7vY+DmxjkOhLlKhZitXkDJGU6S8MDnEXv4YbE4zcsffxqlSQSnH7DjZ
+ NdPnLB+H3aYkh0rtLSs0zrylr+ZgX8tnc9P0ZNL1q1LTcYXa2sCS+9WXOqLufigg+HHY
+ YX/WVUwZCOqeCQ9YZ4wFl1OphgEMtEkSIpVlUcEZxjgAt5PCZFgDpOaIAjnCZhAVjHwo
+ tyK15KdsfMTAit+U1tVgYWznMR6yE6PqRzPsOeiaaf09/vv4/9D33hr7od4FgDqhthEA
+ UBgg==
+X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmPXlWMGjkcQwCYSIIXtJUmQ/r0Ef/llHYv1S27dRaMGKDJe9q7qORM4EVC5X+7uy23zKyf
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.182.119.132 with SMTP id ku4mr1166951obb.34.1431560765057;
+ Wed, 13 May 2015 16:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.202.83.88 with HTTP; Wed, 13 May 2015 16:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAE28kURWFveC0B-WvFebMpGm1GY-8juxQ+UDpuYtOwVnbOgu-A@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <5550D8BE.6070207@electrum.org>
+ <ce3d34c92efd1cf57326e4679550944e@national.shitposting.agency>
+ <CABsx9T1VgxEJWxrYTs+2hXGnGrSLGJ6mVcAexjXLvK7Vu+e3EA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <5551F376.4050008@electrum.org>
+ <CABsx9T1h7p3hDr7ty43uxsYs-oNRpndzg=dowST2tXtogxRm2g@mail.gmail.com>
+ <555210AF.3090705@electrum.org>
+ <CABsx9T3AxM3et7hgXx3+Rn3BvhQkF-Cn797sHcyztkMpD1UQmA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <55531E19.3090503@electrum.org>
+ <CAE-z3OXa8vk6Q1EBChoRYDOLKw--CXNXz4AokXCbVam_8LFFDg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAE28kURWFveC0B-WvFebMpGm1GY-8juxQ+UDpuYtOwVnbOgu-A@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 01:46:04 +0200
+Message-ID: <CABm2gDoOGcdUeo_xgPp7w7AFs3Fza5VdeqSyV-T9MNhuN3RMeA@mail.gmail.com>
+From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
+To: Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+X-Headers-End: 1YshAQ-0003Ej-Ny
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Long-term mining incentives
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 00:38:27 -0000
+
+On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com> wrote:
+> But this matters if a new node has access to the globally strongest chain.
+> If attacker is able to block connections to legitimate nodes, a new node
+> will happily accept attacker's chain.
+
+If you get isolated from the network you may not get the longest valid
+chain. I don't think any other consensus mechanism deals with this
+better than Bitcoin.
+
+> So PoW, by itself, doesn't give strong security guarantees. This problem is
+> so fundamental people avoid talking about it.
+>
+> In practice, Bitcoin already embraces "weak subjectivity" e.g. in form of
+> checkpoints embedded into the source code. So it's hard to take PoW purists
+> seriously.
+
+Checkpoints are NOT part of the consensus rules, they're just an
+optimization that can be removed.
+Try keeping the genesis block as your only checkpoint and rebuild: it
+will work. You can also define your own checkpoints, there's no need
+for everyone to use the same ones.
+In a future with committed utxo the optimization could be bigger, but
+still, we shouldn't rely on checkpoints for consensus, they're just an
+optimization and you should only trust checkpoints that are buried in
+the chain. Trusting a committed utxo checkpoint from 2 years ago
+doesn't seem very risky. If the code is not already done (not really
+sure if it was done as part of auto-prune), we should be prepared for
+reorgs that invalidate checkpoints.
+So, no, Bitcoin does NOT rely on that "weak subjectivity" thing.
+
+