diff options
author | Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com> | 2013-10-02 20:16:03 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2013-10-03 03:16:11 +0000 |
commit | a29badcf89e382018424e0c818f3cc5500475ef0 (patch) | |
tree | e402834dbcc6dfd2bcfc48bcb57aa3ac1a308444 | |
parent | decdbe84a57ef6ba51a6cf342c3bd9744ce44394 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-a29badcf89e382018424e0c818f3cc5500475ef0.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-a29badcf89e382018424e0c818f3cc5500475ef0.zip |
[Bitcoin-development] on CDB::Rewrite()
-rw-r--r-- | d3/03cd0b278d1e4425edcf181eadf19775eaa677 | 140 |
1 files changed, 140 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/d3/03cd0b278d1e4425edcf181eadf19775eaa677 b/d3/03cd0b278d1e4425edcf181eadf19775eaa677 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0b3975bb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/d3/03cd0b278d1e4425edcf181eadf19775eaa677 @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <rdwnj@yahoo.com>) id 1VRZOd-0006mJ-Pq + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:11 +0000 +X-ACL-Warn: +Received: from nm28-vm4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([98.136.216.163]) + by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) + (Exim 4.76) id 1VRZOc-0003cs-AU + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:11 +0000 +Received: from [98.137.12.191] by nm28.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; + 03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000 +Received: from [98.137.12.216] by tm12.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; + 03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000 +Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; + 03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000 +X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 +X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 197909.88657.bm@omp1024.mail.gq1.yahoo.com +Received: (qmail 7797 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Oct 2013 03:16:03 -0000 +X-YMail-OSG: 1FUFgFwVM1mIsfIutbS07cEkcMiWb1sPZmt96T4OShWmxXw + oAmOMuiLXy90IfdYnpxbrAI_ZSl5bVc.l0Oo5WYBhEWu25zP0zSfRZdu9s5t + ZgElfD2R5y1W6A6QG1FI9W.trUaR4JiPUBmPQ7bEMvZasFscvaVRarZzPPkY + FsxO4PoMDT_vMLG.qJIr0gcze14v_cHgEJhnp0jL4aF8xhPIhbpWw6s4mD6w + j5_kClmojtWoDSbvojn_gWpCStizwspSNL0AMD4W07mMOYQwiraELr90wlbT + X253_PS9vnISz_Ki61HTG_6RIbntIelrR4dTtAVy5i7HIB1j.Dj9cM_gQlzM + 0UgF18ADBO_pTQWOTh8v9Yg5ZeJ4R2W5ijSlKDSbNhOG0rKl5fTqx0A8tJ9m + HyxxVTrUbrHhtFXFBt0nc9sPD603JCBTiNRZgx5qCvIPI2eZN6NitQMwiZE7 + XGMN4471NNWXe_crO_Slura2p5UXbFTvU5VmhbvrsUakg8jtJwvINCO4O959 + vOIU.CG5tnkbvfytlkKQE6_hKCyheTkcna0xB2AOj8quL9pOODPRjSizLdpU + hYHuRuFGK7HKJT6ivtwYnaNaaiAxPKwdBtHjuQEcL0xeU46TuVwqtu_sKfZo + _YWRusIiFb3kdVMT6GWNA +Received: from [68.196.240.212] by web124502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; + Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:16:03 PDT +X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, + SSBvbmx5IGJyaW5nIHRoaXMgdXAgaGVyZSBzaW5jZSBJIGNhbid0IHJhaXNlIGh0dHBzOi8vYml0Y29pbnRhbGsub3JnPyBQZXJoYXBzIGl0IHJ1bnMgb24gdGhlIHNpbGsgcm9hZCBzZXJ2ZXJzOikKClVwb24gbG9va2luZyBhdCB0aGUgMC44LjUgJiBlYXJsaWVyIGNvZGUgZm9yIENEQjpSZXdyaXRlKCksIGluIHRoZSBmaWxlcyBkYi5oIGFuZCBkYi5jcHAsIHlvdSB3aWxsIG5vdGljZSB0aGF0IGluIGRiLmggaXQgaXMgZGVjbGFyZWQgYm9vbCBzdGF0aWMsIGJ1dCBpbiBkYi5jcHAgaXQgaXNuJ3QuIElzIHQBMAEBAQE- +X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587 +Message-ID: <1380770163.7534.YahooMailNeo@web124502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> +Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:16:03 -0700 (PDT) +From: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com> +To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" + <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; + boundary="-626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534" +X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + no trust [98.136.216.163 listed in list.dnswl.org] + 0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM Envelope sender username looks random + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (rdwnj[at]yahoo.com) + 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net + [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?98.136.216.163>] + -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + domain + 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. + See + http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block + for more information. [URIs: bitcointalk.org] + 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1VRZOc-0003cs-AU +Subject: [Bitcoin-development] on CDB::Rewrite() +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +Reply-To: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com> +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:12 -0000 + +---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +I only bring this up here since I can't raise https://bitcointalk.org? Perh= +aps it runs on the silk road servers:)=0A=0AUpon looking at the 0.8.5 & ear= +lier code for CDB:Rewrite(), in the files db.h and db.cpp, you will notice = +that in db.h it is declared bool static, but in db.cpp it isn't. Is this a = +problem? Or a feature? Or nothing at all?=0A=0A=0AFurthermore, it is called= + only in wallet.cpp -->CWallet::EncryptWallet() but its return value is ign= +ored? Again, intentional or a bug or a feature or a ...?=0ANow CWallet::Enc= +ryptWallet() is called by AskPassphraseDialog::accept() and WalletModel::se= +tWalletEncrypted()and they seem very interested in what=A0 CWallet::Encrypt= +Wallet() returns. Could this be involved in some old issue with wallet encr= +yption on bitcoin-qt 0.8.1?=0A=0AThere seems to be plenty of this kind of "= +suspicious" code to ferret about in, with one's IDE during quiet moments. A= +musing is to follow return 0 and return 1 to try and infer their meaning, t= +heir intent?=0A=0A=0ARon=0A +---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ti= +mes new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>I only bring thi= +s up here since I can't raise https://bitcointalk.org? Perhaps it runs on t= +he silk road servers:)</div><div><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0= +); font-size: 16px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; back= +ground-color: transparent; font-style: normal;">Upon looking at the 0.8.5 &= +amp; earlier code for CDB:Rewrite(), in the files db.h and db.cpp, you will= + notice that in db.h it is declared bool static, but in db.cpp it isn't. Is= + this a problem? Or a feature? Or nothing at all?<br></div><div><br></div><= +div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: times new r= +oman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: norma= +l;">Furthermore, it is called only in wallet.cpp -->CWallet::EncryptWall= +et() but its return value is ignored? Again, intentional or a bug or a + feature or a ...?</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px;= + font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: trans= +parent; font-style: normal;">Now CWallet::EncryptWallet() is called by AskP= +assphraseDialog::accept() and WalletModel::setWalletEncrypted()and they see= +m very interested in what CWallet::EncryptWallet() returns. Could thi= +s be involved in some old issue with wallet encryption on bitcoin-qt 0.8.1?= +</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: time= +s new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style= +: normal;"><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; fo= +nt-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transpar= +ent; font-style: normal;">There seems to be plenty of this kind of "suspici= +ous" code to ferret about in, with one's IDE during quiet moments. Amusing = +is to follow return 0 and return 1 to try and infer their meaning, their + intent?<br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-= +family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent= +; font-style: normal;"><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-si= +ze: 16px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-col= +or: transparent; font-style: normal;">Ron<br></div></div></body></html> +---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534-- + + |