summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRon <rdwnj@yahoo.com>2013-10-02 20:16:03 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2013-10-03 03:16:11 +0000
commita29badcf89e382018424e0c818f3cc5500475ef0 (patch)
treee402834dbcc6dfd2bcfc48bcb57aa3ac1a308444
parentdecdbe84a57ef6ba51a6cf342c3bd9744ce44394 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-a29badcf89e382018424e0c818f3cc5500475ef0.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-a29badcf89e382018424e0c818f3cc5500475ef0.zip
[Bitcoin-development] on CDB::Rewrite()
-rw-r--r--d3/03cd0b278d1e4425edcf181eadf19775eaa677140
1 files changed, 140 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/d3/03cd0b278d1e4425edcf181eadf19775eaa677 b/d3/03cd0b278d1e4425edcf181eadf19775eaa677
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0b3975bb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/d3/03cd0b278d1e4425edcf181eadf19775eaa677
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <rdwnj@yahoo.com>) id 1VRZOd-0006mJ-Pq
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:11 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from nm28-vm4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([98.136.216.163])
+ by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1VRZOc-0003cs-AU
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:11 +0000
+Received: from [98.137.12.191] by nm28.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000
+Received: from [98.137.12.216] by tm12.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000
+X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
+X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 197909.88657.bm@omp1024.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
+Received: (qmail 7797 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Oct 2013 03:16:03 -0000
+X-YMail-OSG: 1FUFgFwVM1mIsfIutbS07cEkcMiWb1sPZmt96T4OShWmxXw
+ oAmOMuiLXy90IfdYnpxbrAI_ZSl5bVc.l0Oo5WYBhEWu25zP0zSfRZdu9s5t
+ ZgElfD2R5y1W6A6QG1FI9W.trUaR4JiPUBmPQ7bEMvZasFscvaVRarZzPPkY
+ FsxO4PoMDT_vMLG.qJIr0gcze14v_cHgEJhnp0jL4aF8xhPIhbpWw6s4mD6w
+ j5_kClmojtWoDSbvojn_gWpCStizwspSNL0AMD4W07mMOYQwiraELr90wlbT
+ X253_PS9vnISz_Ki61HTG_6RIbntIelrR4dTtAVy5i7HIB1j.Dj9cM_gQlzM
+ 0UgF18ADBO_pTQWOTh8v9Yg5ZeJ4R2W5ijSlKDSbNhOG0rKl5fTqx0A8tJ9m
+ HyxxVTrUbrHhtFXFBt0nc9sPD603JCBTiNRZgx5qCvIPI2eZN6NitQMwiZE7
+ XGMN4471NNWXe_crO_Slura2p5UXbFTvU5VmhbvrsUakg8jtJwvINCO4O959
+ vOIU.CG5tnkbvfytlkKQE6_hKCyheTkcna0xB2AOj8quL9pOODPRjSizLdpU
+ hYHuRuFGK7HKJT6ivtwYnaNaaiAxPKwdBtHjuQEcL0xeU46TuVwqtu_sKfZo
+ _YWRusIiFb3kdVMT6GWNA
+Received: from [68.196.240.212] by web124502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
+ Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:16:03 PDT
+X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,
+ SSBvbmx5IGJyaW5nIHRoaXMgdXAgaGVyZSBzaW5jZSBJIGNhbid0IHJhaXNlIGh0dHBzOi8vYml0Y29pbnRhbGsub3JnPyBQZXJoYXBzIGl0IHJ1bnMgb24gdGhlIHNpbGsgcm9hZCBzZXJ2ZXJzOikKClVwb24gbG9va2luZyBhdCB0aGUgMC44LjUgJiBlYXJsaWVyIGNvZGUgZm9yIENEQjpSZXdyaXRlKCksIGluIHRoZSBmaWxlcyBkYi5oIGFuZCBkYi5jcHAsIHlvdSB3aWxsIG5vdGljZSB0aGF0IGluIGRiLmggaXQgaXMgZGVjbGFyZWQgYm9vbCBzdGF0aWMsIGJ1dCBpbiBkYi5jcHAgaXQgaXNuJ3QuIElzIHQBMAEBAQE-
+X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587
+Message-ID: <1380770163.7534.YahooMailNeo@web124502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
+From: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com>
+To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
+ <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
+ boundary="-626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534"
+X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
+ no trust [98.136.216.163 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ 0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM Envelope sender username looks random
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (rdwnj[at]yahoo.com)
+ 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
+ [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?98.136.216.163>]
+ -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+ 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
+ See
+ http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
+ for more information. [URIs: bitcointalk.org]
+ 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1VRZOc-0003cs-AU
+Subject: [Bitcoin-development] on CDB::Rewrite()
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+Reply-To: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com>
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:12 -0000
+
+---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+I only bring this up here since I can't raise https://bitcointalk.org? Perh=
+aps it runs on the silk road servers:)=0A=0AUpon looking at the 0.8.5 & ear=
+lier code for CDB:Rewrite(), in the files db.h and db.cpp, you will notice =
+that in db.h it is declared bool static, but in db.cpp it isn't. Is this a =
+problem? Or a feature? Or nothing at all?=0A=0A=0AFurthermore, it is called=
+ only in wallet.cpp -->CWallet::EncryptWallet() but its return value is ign=
+ored? Again, intentional or a bug or a feature or a ...?=0ANow CWallet::Enc=
+ryptWallet() is called by AskPassphraseDialog::accept() and WalletModel::se=
+tWalletEncrypted()and they seem very interested in what=A0 CWallet::Encrypt=
+Wallet() returns. Could this be involved in some old issue with wallet encr=
+yption on bitcoin-qt 0.8.1?=0A=0AThere seems to be plenty of this kind of "=
+suspicious" code to ferret about in, with one's IDE during quiet moments. A=
+musing is to follow return 0 and return 1 to try and infer their meaning, t=
+heir intent?=0A=0A=0ARon=0A
+---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ti=
+mes new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>I only bring thi=
+s up here since I can't raise https://bitcointalk.org? Perhaps it runs on t=
+he silk road servers:)</div><div><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0=
+); font-size: 16px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; back=
+ground-color: transparent; font-style: normal;">Upon looking at the 0.8.5 &=
+amp; earlier code for CDB:Rewrite(), in the files db.h and db.cpp, you will=
+ notice that in db.h it is declared bool static, but in db.cpp it isn't. Is=
+ this a problem? Or a feature? Or nothing at all?<br></div><div><br></div><=
+div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: times new r=
+oman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: norma=
+l;">Furthermore, it is called only in wallet.cpp --&gt;CWallet::EncryptWall=
+et() but its return value is ignored? Again, intentional or a bug or a
+ feature or a ...?</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px;=
+ font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: trans=
+parent; font-style: normal;">Now CWallet::EncryptWallet() is called by AskP=
+assphraseDialog::accept() and WalletModel::setWalletEncrypted()and they see=
+m very interested in what&nbsp; CWallet::EncryptWallet() returns. Could thi=
+s be involved in some old issue with wallet encryption on bitcoin-qt 0.8.1?=
+</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: time=
+s new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style=
+: normal;"><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; fo=
+nt-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transpar=
+ent; font-style: normal;">There seems to be plenty of this kind of "suspici=
+ous" code to ferret about in, with one's IDE during quiet moments. Amusing =
+is to follow return 0 and return 1 to try and infer their meaning, their
+ intent?<br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-=
+family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent=
+; font-style: normal;"><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-si=
+ze: 16px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-col=
+or: transparent; font-style: normal;">Ron<br></div></div></body></html>
+---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534--
+
+