summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKostas Karasavvas <kkarasavvas@gmail.com>2023-02-04 16:11:33 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2023-02-04 14:11:47 +0000
commita1cee02aaf1a26f0ea8bd27b8b664ff546448f07 (patch)
tree608852563fd2495c1e317998d5f3f2f6961a2018
parentfadf99b9f7fc8cf33bcefaaab1a7460e4012b295 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-a1cee02aaf1a26f0ea8bd27b8b664ff546448f07.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-a1cee02aaf1a26f0ea8bd27b8b664ff546448f07.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--81/a7d29dcc3b024cd05aeeed9820f775c442f117152
1 files changed, 152 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/81/a7d29dcc3b024cd05aeeed9820f775c442f117 b/81/a7d29dcc3b024cd05aeeed9820f775c442f117
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2e8f8295d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/81/a7d29dcc3b024cd05aeeed9820f775c442f117
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+Return-Path: <kkarasavvas@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
+ by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746FBC002B
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC2D813B6
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
+DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 3BC2D813B6
+Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
+ dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
+ header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=gQdaqBVU
+X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: -2.098
+X-Spam-Level:
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
+ tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
+ DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
+ HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
+ SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
+Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id m57ExnoYu7I7
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:11:46 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
+DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 759EE813B8
+Received: from mail-yw1-x112c.google.com (mail-yw1-x112c.google.com
+ [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112c])
+ by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759EE813B8
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:11:46 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-yw1-x112c.google.com with SMTP id
+ 00721157ae682-527979e8670so16707467b3.10
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 04 Feb 2023 06:11:46 -0800 (PST)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
+ h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
+ :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
+ bh=RNNHz1Poz/o84m3Bfz+h2Hsf+Oav0nvJoa9Vy8b4kDU=;
+ b=gQdaqBVUEWl97n5Nwo3qE84x7KqjuyxgxVCDMl07vVWBZlKkfWT8R56wxC1R+qqhrF
+ LzJ0y/bU3y8aKkkiWB3K641JyngV8K2SSCbr2uyNuDdPBZEiXs/R5MJzYPThryrS5nbs
+ sfsnib/4VnrPmJLnMmQygIsCCz6q213rhLW52qntj+OcXpQKIgiDAwKqikkGL/johtbb
+ pDourAVYNYZlij9Kb5cYzGS5haswpO5O9D5o9OP/aKP8fliXYyZ+1/XjM0uzXs2zaML9
+ wJI4ulPA35ImEsz76D3n3AXi0w50Ml5oeY6lkwoBai1pndpdCFXbkvNcD3fulLEG8rIL
+ L/9Q==
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
+ h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
+ :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
+ bh=RNNHz1Poz/o84m3Bfz+h2Hsf+Oav0nvJoa9Vy8b4kDU=;
+ b=zjVx+2OQWjbs0VreDmqVvmxlKMZeS7RwlmG82tbWoCIgRLNsvFgCfxfdEpDXpZhjnL
+ 8plaJD30HHN9IlRhHuU8ZjeOIcwdHGuo8kbZcQK+MY1Z03enmMhkFvAwPx/q6cblPw02
+ wfkxEsxnmsRKZpMXvGMEAdbEIrkYB7EdqwxfCSYml/n+O3E7W0baR+BrFedbIRtVAUWJ
+ bSYI+sS8smTQvIMItH8RQ4JQEtmIpcU0mXG9sQm0C9BI4Ee8BdTtr+4f3LCPX5S8Di/M
+ Mn4J4mU7mTscyf7DwO9aR2NZ0MKVT3R6rEW22Y9jXK4ryllpuXshWzbmZ3tQHjikW+b7
+ pq+g==
+X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVd+DRTj8l4aaXnRTv/Vom7qEnLj/2ia3ZNhTbEnPaZT5tTsPcG
+ ftD8eaX5Stoca7lmUGHkVS67aqJInwLdqyJI+kwFMuvb
+X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/itad+9OrKDDcch0Xu0enO3ZVysi7vpGjde8URYeRgIWzfnGkTSc6Q7W+essRezeIqqvHTv7qaRBbeFLG7qD4=
+X-Received: by 2002:a81:6541:0:b0:4d7:eb11:6bf7 with SMTP id
+ z62-20020a816541000000b004d7eb116bf7mr1378436ywb.235.1675519905266; Sat, 04
+ Feb 2023 06:11:45 -0800 (PST)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <ca8622cb-445e-4258-bbac-b3ee1ce95f4c@protonmail.com>
+ <57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com>
+ <CACrqygCNf3Gv8+VjhyqS4GTb3Epo8qXEKGtQB6sqyR6ib44-fA@mail.gmail.com>
+In-Reply-To: <CACrqygCNf3Gv8+VjhyqS4GTb3Epo8qXEKGtQB6sqyR6ib44-fA@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Kostas Karasavvas <kkarasavvas@gmail.com>
+Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:11:33 +0200
+Message-ID: <CABE6yHtM2Dqc63_eURSr7dMirJti5sYnqvHj7vQ_Ab9FC_d04g@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>,
+ Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c4812c05f3e0606d"
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 15:46:34 +0000
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE
+ OP_IF OP_PUSH
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 14:11:47 -0000
+
+--000000000000c4812c05f3e0606d
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
+
+On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:17 PM Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev <
+bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+
+> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:52 AM Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev <
+> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+>
+>> I think the right way so people don't invent deviant things is to
+>> increase the size of OP_RETURN, I don't get this number of 80B, you can
+>> hardly store a signature (of what?) in there and not the "what" if the
+>> "what" is a hash for example
+>>
+>
+> Updating the size of OP_RETURN to support a hash (or two), a signature,
+> and maybe a few more bytes for metadata, would be very helpful in a number
+> of scenarios. It is still a limit but a reasonable one. Otherwise, I think
+> we'll have a lot more inscription-style scenarios.
+>
+
+I wouldn't be against an increase in OP_RETURN but I don't think it will
+make any difference in how often inscription-style use cases will be used.
+They will be used primarily for much larger datasets than, say 120 bytes,
+and they also have the segwit discount.
+
+--000000000000c4812c05f3e0606d
+Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
+<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:17 PM Chris=
+topher Allen via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxf=
+oundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></di=
+v><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;borde=
+r-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div d=
+ir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:52 AM Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev &lt=
+;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank"=
+>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><div class=
+=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px =
+0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I think =
+the right way so people don&#39;t invent deviant things is to<br>
+increase the size of OP_RETURN, I don&#39;t get this number of 80B, you can=
+<br>
+hardly store a signature (of what?) in there and not the &quot;what&quot; i=
+f the<br>
+&quot;what&quot; is a hash for example<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>=
+Updating the size of OP_RETURN to support a hash (or two), a signature, and=
+ maybe a few more bytes for metadata, would be very helpful in a number of =
+scenarios. It is still a limit but a reasonable one. Otherwise, I think we&=
+#39;ll have a lot more inscription-style scenarios.</div><div></div></div><=
+/div></blockquote><div><br></div>I wouldn&#39;t be against an increase in O=
+P_RETURN but I don&#39;t think it will make any difference in how often ins=
+cription-style use cases will be used. They will be used primarily for much=
+ larger datasets than, say 120 bytes, and they also have the segwit discoun=
+t.<br></div></div>
+
+--000000000000c4812c05f3e0606d--
+
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-04-30 12:09:27 +0000