summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>2015-08-25 17:29:58 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-08-26 00:30:11 +0000
commit9f39dd6a6e3a47aeee884951bd07dfd64750bb8c (patch)
tree1b2d06b4fcb58ea0c9ef1164389146956a49578b
parent9745c1a3accd704572f13fe5f8d0e7d52f56950e (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-9f39dd6a6e3a47aeee884951bd07dfd64750bb8c.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-9f39dd6a6e3a47aeee884951bd07dfd64750bb8c.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap [BIP 1xx - Draft]
-rw-r--r--4b/ada6e023d2cbeff1c2d583ccf6e44c1df6548f117
1 files changed, 117 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/4b/ada6e023d2cbeff1c2d583ccf6e44c1df6548f b/4b/ada6e023d2cbeff1c2d583ccf6e44c1df6548f
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..931cee6ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/4b/ada6e023d2cbeff1c2d583ccf6e44c1df6548f
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D59F09FB
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from outmail148096.authsmtp.net (outmail148096.authsmtp.net
+ [62.13.148.96])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFC417B
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
+ by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7Q0U4Ve025506;
+ Wed, 26 Aug 2015 01:30:04 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from muck ([50.58.157.74]) (authenticated bits=128)
+ by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7Q0TxDw048867
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
+ Wed, 26 Aug 2015 01:30:02 +0100 (BST)
+Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:29:58 -0700
+From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
+To: Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com>
+Message-ID: <20150826002958.GA10628@muck>
+References: <CAED3CWipF8u5g3LUrqfyHxvEk4Lu+d12ZOJZnoBUw6iZZOg-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAFzgq-x9GBbqARyhMgfSPc=wYeBgzXy4VUQ0D76GC+TCAxWDuA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <20150825201643.GC11083@muck> <1489961.GhSFCGzPRJ@crushinator>
+ <20150825203744.GB3464@muck> <55DCDB98.80004@bitcartel.com>
+ <CAFzgq-zwkJ2QnnpFsf6X7L00k=+b4s--1POq_=T7j=v-+e1FTg@mail.gmail.com>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7"
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <CAFzgq-zwkJ2QnnpFsf6X7L00k=+b4s--1POq_=T7j=v-+e1FTg@mail.gmail.com>
+X-Server-Quench: 97e9a6cc-4b89-11e5-9f75-002590a135d3
+X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
+ http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
+X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
+ bwdMdAQUGUATAgsB AmMbW1VeU117WWA7 bgpPaA1DY09JQQJu
+ T01BRU1TWkFvYBxl TmpZUh16fwNBNn90 ZUBnEHlcCU0rcxUu
+ X0oGHWQbZGY1bX0W BkddagNUcgZDfk5E aVUrVz1vNG8XDSg5
+ AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWx5 UwcEKFMZSEIPD3YX QBYeBzIrGUAJDw8y
+ MxchK1hUNkIWOUZ6 ClozVBo9Og9aIQRG fQl+Kg5hbwARV2Ju RS9AVEACJVUA
+X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
+X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
+X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 50.58.157.74/587
+X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
+ anti-virus system.
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, greg@xiph.org
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
+ [BIP 1xx - Draft]
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:30:12 -0000
+
+
+--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:44:46AM +0800, Chun Wang wrote:
+> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Simon Liu via bitcoin-dev
+> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+> > I don't think this would work.
+> >
+> > If the rule is that one user can only have one vote, how do you prevent
+> > a user running multiple nodes?
+>=20
+> The vote is not counted by nodes, but bitcoin amount, or probably
+> better, coin-days. It works like proof-of-stake. A mix of
+> proof-of-work and proof-of-stake is good.
+
+Yup.
+
+To implement a vote where only users with access to a full node can
+vote, you'd force part of the vote to be determined by a
+non-miner-committed value calculatable by anyone with a full node. For
+instance, a very simple toy example that would work is just XORing your
+vote with SHA256(the entire blockchain)
+
+--=20
+'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
+000000000000000008d42f5514157c3257577e006985ea8335e4567e1bed16bd
+
+--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+Content-Description: Digital signature
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+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==
+=4pYO
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--
+