diff options
| author | John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com> | 2011-07-02 16:50:14 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2011-07-02 16:50:24 +0000 |
| commit | 9d033880f3332f0133264109ff9fed9f93f7b325 (patch) | |
| tree | 523834c526cb8ab6b4cdfc68d9b73fd3e970d5ec | |
| parent | e083cc466ffedb86f1d7fb236549a0a688bde07a (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-9d033880f3332f0133264109ff9fed9f93f7b325.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-9d033880f3332f0133264109ff9fed9f93f7b325.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change?
| -rw-r--r-- | 11/95cb49d722ce9e71a42162aaff25c4d3560503 | 118 |
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/11/95cb49d722ce9e71a42162aaff25c4d3560503 b/11/95cb49d722ce9e71a42162aaff25c4d3560503 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..374b4b445 --- /dev/null +++ b/11/95cb49d722ce9e71a42162aaff25c4d3560503 @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qd3Oi-0007MI-9p + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:50:24 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.160.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com; + helo=mail-gy0-f175.google.com; +Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1Qd3Od-0000qq-T3 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:50:24 +0000 +Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so2135290gyd.34 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:50:14 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.151.60.14 with SMTP id n14mr4228333ybk.72.1309625414449; Sat, + 02 Jul 2011 09:50:14 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.151.150.15 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 09:50:14 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <201107021050.10563.luke@dashjr.org> +References: <CAJNQ0stvozeQAVFkduY7Ph5EXy8ayYwiu4T+6Oz1RwjgiDnBeA@mail.gmail.com> + <201107021050.10563.luke@dashjr.org> +Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 16:50:14 +0000 +Message-ID: <CAJNQ0svyJcob=gfWfi7YuLWTdbLokrFyDGnMFtYLRk_29r-DZw@mail.gmail.com> +From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com> +To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325552e029dfbb504a718ed92 +X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in + digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) + 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1Qd3Od-0000qq-T3 +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change? +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:50:24 -0000 + +--000325552e029dfbb504a718ed92 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 + +On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote: + +> On Saturday, July 02, 2011 3:29:04 AM John Smith wrote: +> > Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead of +> > cmake? +> +> I don't really care much either way, but cmake doesn't follow the standard +> build procedure (./configure && make && make install), though I imagine +> ./configure could be emulated with some script. +> + +It would change the sequence to + +cmake . && make && make install + +So a shell script named 'configure' that starts 'cmake .' is the most easy +case :-) Probably it'd also need to pass through some command line args, for +example --prefix. + +JS + +--000325552e029dfbb504a718ed92 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Luke-Jr <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"ma= +ilto:luke@dashjr.org">luke@dashjr.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class= +=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8= +ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> +<div class=3D"im">On Saturday, July 02, 2011 3:29:04 AM John Smith wrote:<b= +r> +> Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead o= +f<br> +> cmake?<br> +<br> +</div>I don't really care much either way, but cmake doesn't follow= + the standard<br> +build procedure (./configure && make && make install), thou= +gh I imagine<br> +./configure could be emulated with some script.<br> +</blockquote></div><br>It would change the sequence to<br> +<br> +cmake . && make && make install<br> +<br> +So a shell script named 'configure' that starts 'cmake .' i= +s the most easy case :-) Probably it'd also need to pass through some c= +ommand line args, for example --prefix.<br> +<br> +JS<br><br> + +--000325552e029dfbb504a718ed92-- + + |