diff options
author | Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> | 2015-12-09 11:40:34 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-12-09 16:40:37 +0000 |
commit | 9ba93ea2d4ca1c5cfab0d94ec4308a4216f63d00 (patch) | |
tree | 3987d809b0ceeb3f82436fbc4c03a71156a3d983 | |
parent | e92372b5a6e5fb2239594d5a52585b6a584a78e3 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-9ba93ea2d4ca1c5cfab0d94ec4308a4216f63d00.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-9ba93ea2d4ca1c5cfab0d94ec4308a4216f63d00.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system.
-rw-r--r-- | 23/2d54eb86c8ca084fbeaa2f02936cd4b0c256ed | 153 |
1 files changed, 153 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/23/2d54eb86c8ca084fbeaa2f02936cd4b0c256ed b/23/2d54eb86c8ca084fbeaa2f02936cd4b0c256ed new file mode 100644 index 000000000..858d8ab3e --- /dev/null +++ b/23/2d54eb86c8ca084fbeaa2f02936cd4b0c256ed @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +Return-Path: <gavinandresen@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F86CDD + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:40:37 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com (mail-lf0-f49.google.com + [209.85.215.49]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FC98171 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:40:36 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by lfs39 with SMTP id 39so38580015lfs.3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:40:35 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=g2WZxPQf2/e/t42w1k+vzVxEWcdXu/cSx6A66+w7+JM=; + b=tOGHkVEbdRpV3lcJDYiSEYH4+xS7iFHRnre5fdWJ2w3T5PNRIEVftQYiTMtFukJUad + 4J6oavUEpKCNfYNKGdeq9UDH3eZDwum61dT1kpO0L2jIXwk2v4YRAOTbJ1P2HCD/2tBC + O85PXWQjSaPAH+wsm+QBG7CEae4Euzvz9S80qNhEqWs+jZX57LxFEyu0e0HC83OeEqfn + pw13zjLXUut2sZr3fkSV8L2El9jPTFxum6pqDQ2DJuAkAXC9wKbhHVgQ5Q5Sf60xFbrg + FaQss3ONDPKmfG/ztYz8SNyG16YM+5k8DFPrQqUFRIX6OClfKsx0C8LakamJJaJmny3W + cZ/A== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.25.27.147 with SMTP id b141mr2730644lfb.87.1449679234962; + Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:40:34 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.25.22.95 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:40:34 -0800 (PST) +In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTAFgANJ495xiOkiW-OeFA_VZHhhR5uL+jVaoYQz_yBPg@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAAS2fgQyVs1fAEj+vqp8E2=FRnqsgs7VUKqALNBHNxRMDsHdVg@mail.gmail.com> + <20151208110752.GA31180@amethyst.visucore.com> + <CABm2gDpcek=u=Rpe68EMOq6M7Bji9J=s5VvoQWKRqaQDAP5kTw@mail.gmail.com> + <CABsx9T1wga3Tandoe2mVGSKdHJytHoc9Ko7HRm2SvJXABEFk9w@mail.gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgTGYSiAJHZq80rD4UieV8XetS=W0b45b5onWAS9gF-F7g@mail.gmail.com> + <CABsx9T1i50Gvxj18W=n2mYGNpsMrSkDT26CdA3aQqT5FFN86yw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgSxpSat3VOje3-C4zgaRUVJVx-eRJbSYJqhvfR5SvCDwA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAF_2MyUJMdJyh7FKq6UYCtwJZQ59i-pnWT_tFEK5EQx65iwHDQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgS-jjEVeHf_LErppTadtAaSeBum+KiGHpoo=Jz5BZArsQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDq4f0ettDhh14jZ0zztSwSJ0Z=KDEeMTOJxTHF8VV+KXw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgTAFgANJ495xiOkiW-OeFA_VZHhhR5uL+jVaoYQz_yBPg@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:40:34 -0500 +Message-ID: <CABsx9T1pLtOaGOVpVs8URAwpbb884htkrFLWtX8-2gGpS6gPWw@mail.gmail.com> +From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> +To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11401350d6a136052679bfde +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system. +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:40:37 -0000 + +--001a11401350d6a136052679bfde +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> I think it would be logical to do as part of a hardfork that moved +> commitments generally; e.g. a better position for merged mining (such +> a hardfork was suggested in 2010 as something that could be done if +> merged mining was used), room for commitments to additional block +> back-references for compact SPV proofs, and/or UTXO set commitments. +> Part of the reason to not do it now is that the requirements for the +> other things that would be there are not yet well defined. For these +> other applications, the additional overhead is actually fairly +> meaningful; unlike the fraud proofs. +> + +So just design ahead for those future uses. Make the merkle tree: + + + root_in_block_header + / \ + tx_data_root other_root + / \ + segwitness_root reserved_for_future_use_root + +... where reserved_for_future_use is zero until some future block version +(or perhaps better, is just chosen arbitrarily by the miner and sent along +with the block data until some future block version). + +That would minimize future disruption of any code that produced or consumed +merkle proofs of the transaction data or segwitness data, especially if the +reserved_for_future_use_root is allowed to be any arbitrary 256-bit value +and not a constant that would get hard-coded into segwitness-proof-checking +code. + + +-- +-- +Gavin Andresen + +--001a11401350d6a136052679bfde +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W= +ed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"lt= +r"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_= +blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><bloc= +kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #cc= +c solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=3D":1lt" class=3D"a3s" style=3D"overflow:= +hidden">I think it would be logical to do as part of a hardfork that moved<= +br> +commitments generally; e.g. a better position for merged mining (such<br> +a hardfork was suggested in 2010 as something that could be done if<br> +merged mining was used), room for commitments to additional block<br> +back-references for compact SPV proofs, and/or UTXO set commitments.<br> +Part of the reason to not do it now is that the requirements for the<br> +other things that would be there are not yet well defined. For these<br> +other applications, the additional overhead is actually fairly<br> +meaningful; unlike the fraud proofs.<div class=3D"yj6qo ajU"><div id=3D":1m= +9" class=3D"ajR" tabindex=3D"0"></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>So= + just design ahead for those future uses. Make the merkle tree:</div><div c= +lass=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div cl= +ass=3D"gmail_extra">=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0root_in= +_block_header</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0/ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0\</di= +v><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=C2=A0 tx_data_root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0other_= +root</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= +=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0/ = +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 \</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= + =C2=A0 segwitness_root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 reserved_for_future_use_root</div><di= +v class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">... where rese= +rved_for_future_use is zero until some future block version (or perhaps bet= +ter, is just chosen arbitrarily by the miner and sent along with the block = +data until some future block version).</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br>= +</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">That would minimize future disruption of a= +ny code that produced or consumed merkle proofs of the transaction data or = +segwitness data, especially if the reserved_for_future_use_root is allowed = +to be any arbitrary 256-bit value and not a constant that would get hard-co= +ded into segwitness-proof-checking code.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><b= +r clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">--<br>= +Gavin Andresen<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><br></div> +</div></div> + +--001a11401350d6a136052679bfde-- + |