diff options
| author | Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com> | 2016-09-02 10:10:40 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2016-09-02 17:10:42 +0000 |
| commit | 98d8435479dcbe87c8f203553974c88e2879f5c1 (patch) | |
| tree | df75450d59eda0f40ff296a5f68f9b7b5a3006f5 | |
| parent | ae170ea08703a155a07a809b1085e9c93ec92342 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-98d8435479dcbe87c8f203553974c88e2879f5c1.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-98d8435479dcbe87c8f203553974c88e2879f5c1.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Dealing with dummy stack element malleability
| -rw-r--r-- | eb/a1fa4a530fa7da77f5a09cc335f6e7954397c3 | 86 |
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/eb/a1fa4a530fa7da77f5a09cc335f6e7954397c3 b/eb/a1fa4a530fa7da77f5a09cc335f6e7954397c3 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..edbda6351 --- /dev/null +++ b/eb/a1fa4a530fa7da77f5a09cc335f6e7954397c3 @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA3C8CC + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:10:42 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com (mail-pf0-f174.google.com + [209.85.192.174]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAAE17A + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:10:41 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g202so21081724pfb.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:10:41 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=thinlink-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; + h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version + :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; + bh=pEl7G3kFnmHqC1Y1wyNf4ZaQb6m22GKOHKBJYA/WUGM=; + b=JDsa2SO/YGDEOw6ccEDQe3Hbh2I90Ek84CNzLcECyCrtSUoR3Ca2PLgvd4udHR7Ray + bieCs23TcPoIC4T/YzW1CAaAR5wr/Rtqvvqd806u3y4zLo8hF85tLG8R63G3Xy/mTuQB + zbk0KEscbP9sRa5OrGM1zHjjgt216k+y+W+qz2DlIh1mUHfpyK2J+qqz1sIiAJaVnygu + C9jUEimrvifbBQVAzbD65+N3rs0qjq3C61KihCxb4aypCCz5HhmoNMpNsdGWZJjDDeVQ + GThRtRWvmaQjDXo0rSdXnfEDS9Q0p0VsjCIKRMQCBLD+YIXmQM49jO13O9n2IzNXnhGm + +ZBQ== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date + :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; + bh=pEl7G3kFnmHqC1Y1wyNf4ZaQb6m22GKOHKBJYA/WUGM=; + b=Ii+bg5kdPlk4mi6K8fDKY38VQhmwrF1mgKtzcIG3pwn33JlPk0Bof3kc7u4BcwZvcj + nBJMunymQedPJtNTv18DZmHPWwd70k4jmdb/8wbGziddJh4V2wqYDLJBaQEzsaW2betZ + EZlCOCAUCR5Yn0v2y0ZFKjCOydhGSvyqLuaLLRakk6J9ahKuqmAZkq5pmZx74I3p+Nxm + vOhIkmhhEUabLRZDatoSa5csdsNAv5PS4mCZQ18/sLL8DC3CygY0Jzo6WtH0nvLdtuWP + ws3LN76TrFS5B/gthkYoh+/Y5rrDrZWtFoXfCJZxUd61XKFkwZ/zmj239Hg8GOG4noa/ + tMVA== +X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNgsCKaE/R3S76WlNHc3gvS2GBqb6Fkiqx+yn1UAxxuCKXS8E/JMbIhultXxFCwjUk2 +X-Received: by 10.98.152.6 with SMTP id q6mr38094110pfd.86.1472836241101; + Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:10:41 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net. + [99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id + 7sm16228583pfk.6.2016.09.02.10.10.40 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> + (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:10:40 -0700 (PDT) +To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +References: <1317364559.64256.1472791258452@privateemail.com> +From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com> +Message-ID: <198f7a5e-7912-dfb2-1b61-388a4f81b7b5@thinlink.com> +Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:10:40 -0700 +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 + Thunderbird/45.2.0 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +In-Reply-To: <1317364559.64256.1472791258452@privateemail.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, + RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Dealing with dummy stack element + malleability +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 17:10:42 -0000 + +On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9 using the same parameters for BIP141 and BIP143, with the name "segwit" and using bit 1. +> + +This fix has value outside of segwit. Why bundle the two together? +Shouldn't miners have to opportunity to vote on them independently? + + + |