diff options
| author | Raphael NICOLLE <raphbot@gmail.com> | 2012-07-23 09:23:45 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2012-07-23 07:24:00 +0000 |
| commit | 9689b0d9a548d0e8a06b632edc3682fc9ce285d6 (patch) | |
| tree | b7ddb5d2997e6b46e4edcbfbf7effb022abd48b4 | |
| parent | eb21b608ad3e752eb4135af66512054a15a64c8e (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-9689b0d9a548d0e8a06b632edc3682fc9ce285d6.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-9689b0d9a548d0e8a06b632edc3682fc9ce285d6.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Scalability issues
| -rw-r--r-- | 2e/855fa6266a0739fb83a986527157f4e294ef11 | 101 |
1 files changed, 101 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2e/855fa6266a0739fb83a986527157f4e294ef11 b/2e/855fa6266a0739fb83a986527157f4e294ef11 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6a81322ab --- /dev/null +++ b/2e/855fa6266a0739fb83a986527157f4e294ef11 @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <raphbot@gmail.com>) id 1StCzo-0006b4-Mf + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:24:00 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.217.175; envelope-from=raphbot@gmail.com; + helo=mail-lb0-f175.google.com; +Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]) + by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1StCzj-0005bU-5A + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:24:00 +0000 +Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5so8164803lbo.34 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:23:48 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.152.135.200 with SMTP id pu8mr15508264lab.8.1343028228624; + Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:23:48 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from [192.168.91.242] (33.197-14-84.ripe.coltfrance.com. + [84.14.197.33]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5sm2646860lbg.1.2012.07.23.00.23.46 + (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:23:47 -0700 (PDT) +Message-ID: <500CFC01.2070802@gmail.com> +Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:23:45 +0200 +From: Raphael NICOLLE <raphbot@gmail.com> +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; + rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +To: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> +References: <CAD2Ti29dqCYoOMcX0zcOQnpLGCxnCjYHHqMzyyq+hvcVQ2c7nQ@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti29dqCYoOMcX0zcOQnpLGCxnCjYHHqMzyyq+hvcVQ2c7nQ@mail.gmail.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (raphbot[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1StCzj-0005bU-5A +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Scalability issues +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:24:00 -0000 + +Hello, + +Even though I'm not a dev, I can't agree more, and would like to know if +they are expected steps being taken, some fixes coming, or whatever? + +Thank you all for your hard work. +Raphael + +On 07/23/2012 12:37 AM, grarpamp wrote: +> Given a testbed: Pentium 4 1.8GHz single core, 2GB ram, FreeBSD 8, +> disk is geli aes-128 + zfs sha-256, bitcoin 0.6.3, Tor proxy, +> An estimate is made that by the end of the year bitcoin will +> completely overrun the capabilities of this reasonable class of +> machines. +> It already takes a month to build a new blockchain, let alone keep up +> with new incoming blocks. +> Yes, it also has workstation duties, yet even if those were removed, +> it would probably choke by mid 2013. +> +> It would appear bitcoin has some *serious* scalability hurdles coming +> down the road. +> Most certainly if the user expects to independantly build, manage, and +> trust their own blockchain. +> +> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ +> Live Security Virtual Conference +> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and +> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions +> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware +> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ +> _______________________________________________ +> Bitcoin-development mailing list +> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development + + + |