diff options
| author | Bernd Jendrissek <bitcoin@bpj-code.co.za> | 2019-04-08 00:11:55 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2019-04-07 22:12:09 +0000 |
| commit | 944eff897c102f4bf24892216bad1fb26c3672a4 (patch) | |
| tree | fd9729cc391bb5da5872051dd1e910ffedfcc79e | |
| parent | e0d94f418fb102f1561af653b4738f9ca0980d7c (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-944eff897c102f4bf24892216bad1fb26c3672a4.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-944eff897c102f4bf24892216bad1fb26c3672a4.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] new BIP: Self balancing between excessively low/high fees and block size
| -rw-r--r-- | f5/4ba9e26379f6ad58e7b95551373ac624f0b71c | 72 |
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/f5/4ba9e26379f6ad58e7b95551373ac624f0b71c b/f5/4ba9e26379f6ad58e7b95551373ac624f0b71c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d57e955bb --- /dev/null +++ b/f5/4ba9e26379f6ad58e7b95551373ac624f0b71c @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +Return-Path: <bernd.jendrissek@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 287F8AF0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 7 Apr 2019 22:12:09 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-vs1-f49.google.com (mail-vs1-f49.google.com + [209.85.217.49]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CA7709 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 7 Apr 2019 22:12:08 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-vs1-f49.google.com with SMTP id g127so6470287vsd.6 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 07 Apr 2019 15:12:08 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date + :message-id:subject:to; + bh=A+26WiGQOOSD4WI3uV8g/Q6lffYhjAl2KwoQYXUQOak=; + b=Amm3q4Id68Ogbp28grSfXqU4/SFAA8IBDW3hfL78Tg7syCono2bo0A2ByNJURsrwYn + a9ZfOo2Gt2VHMK6YLFr1MxhPXInlr2JcD2k0SsOMovDM8E+72gEq4aT/d0WJGWXmIcao + iEX6aTe0G4epF0BMPfiFdrRS3m+ywJ4KOuBT0sJABHFzwOHzFvROMIYaWc52+AK12M9s + yddZxFzX18w2RdqXjZhCTnaZ72tVjeKHCC75seuzq2LwNF8ZkyInG2k9ZfjUdhwHHPA8 + D29t/7S4DgTbH+SX4eEmoN9ASWVgNOZnlkDHt4JQBWiUf/3QQYfgNCzRQhoFwN5KRmI2 + Ss3w== +X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXnFwVLGf0UqspDb3oCxjTSKbbAGCpVd4GH/HAsmF7f2OE2GUiX + CojZfXEF92YuXzREKKEjCoEWsLN3yTv/OhO9oI4= +X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyE4raYwjWgQMOTHFKStsQSCNQmAx4mCAUrL7auJt3wG5nf+cc9Bz8GSsixPIZ2RrhoZ9HUSGHGZ4DBGCDEU8s= +X-Received: by 2002:a67:ff11:: with SMTP id v17mr14595920vsp.108.1554675127423; + Sun, 07 Apr 2019 15:12:07 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +References: <trinity-9a1b0170-a250-4c06-a8e1-0f281499c4da-1554627046019@3c-app-gmx-bs53> +In-Reply-To: <trinity-9a1b0170-a250-4c06-a8e1-0f281499c4da-1554627046019@3c-app-gmx-bs53> +From: Bernd Jendrissek <bitcoin@bpj-code.co.za> +Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 00:11:55 +0200 +Message-ID: <CAF7PVPrXg2nefBkPH6E1Qz8hvL8JVSn-mCRCK60TtY1NjA-z3w@mail.gmail.com> +To: simondev1 <random@gmx.ch>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 01:50:39 +0000 +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] new BIP: Self balancing between excessively + low/high fees and block size +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 22:12:09 -0000 + +On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 17:45, simondev1 via bitcoin-dev +<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +> ==Implementation== +> Sort transactions by FeeInSatoshiPerByte (lowest first) +> For each transaction starting from lowest FeeInSatoshiPerByte: Sum up the bytes of space used so far. Check if summed up bytes of space used so far is smaller or equal than the formula result. +> If this is valid for each transaction then the blocksize is valid. + +Doesn't this break CPFP? I think to avoid that you'll need to rework +your proposed algorithm to treat chains of transactions as a group. +(And note that you could have multiple transactions in one block that +depend on the same "parent" transaction, also in the same block.) + |