diff options
author | Jordan Mack <jordanmack@parhelic.com> | 2011-12-18 13:18:58 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2011-12-18 21:19:07 +0000 |
commit | 93da05f004d263f2f78fa106a835dc0c7b87c9fd (patch) | |
tree | a7459903fba12e94846acb6d9b98489e37e3bd0a | |
parent | 1b740ec6e6df1cd8f474be570f34b1a170b5e784 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-93da05f004d263f2f78fa106a835dc0c7b87c9fd.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-93da05f004d263f2f78fa106a835dc0c7b87c9fd.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases
-rw-r--r-- | 75/364b77981d218ae4a363cc30756031363df091 | 91 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/75/364b77981d218ae4a363cc30756031363df091 b/75/364b77981d218ae4a363cc30756031363df091 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..77b4ed947 --- /dev/null +++ b/75/364b77981d218ae4a363cc30756031363df091 @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <jordanmack1981@gmail.com>) id 1RcO8R-0008J7-UM + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:19:07 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.210.175; envelope-from=jordanmack1981@gmail.com; + helo=mail-iy0-f175.google.com; +Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]) + by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1RcO8R-0004yj-AG + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:19:07 +0000 +Received: by iakh37 with SMTP id h37so4985675iak.34 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:02 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.50.183.233 with SMTP id ep9mr23207243igc.67.1324243142026; + Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:02 -0800 (PST) +Received: from [192.168.0.50] (c-67-188-239-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. + [67.188.239.72]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x18sm60373102ibi.2.2011.12.18.13.18.59 + (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:00 -0800 (PST) +Sender: Jordan Mack <jordanmack1981@gmail.com> +Message-ID: <4EEE58C2.1040908@parhelic.com> +Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:18:58 -0800 +From: Jordan Mack <jordanmack@parhelic.com> +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; + rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +References: <1323728469.78044.YahooMailNeo@web121012.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> + <1323979147.27319.140661012141129@webmail.messagingengine.com> + <4EEB7E98.8030006@dot-bit.org> + <CAJna-HjXp4XEHnbmX0HKsMDmnxoWQQMmqujN+D9nLV0Zz_omcg@mail.gmail.com> + <4EEBBD84.6020907@dot-bit.org> + <CAJ1JLtuhwdBC8jJsmS3pTUixdLwh0haB-Gq_CdEmEWYN0-z+QA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAGQP0AH+J5Jo524o+EL9zNdHgpfTorTsyB+Ut4x0W-d9x84JZQ@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CAGQP0AH+J5Jo524o+EL9zNdHgpfTorTsyB+Ut4x0W-d9x84JZQ@mail.gmail.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (jordanmack1981[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in + digit (jordanmack1981[at]gmail.com) + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1RcO8R-0004yj-AG +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:19:08 -0000 + +I can't speak for Namecoin. As for the HTTPS requirement, I'm on the +fence. Without it, the resolution is open to a man in the middle attack. +Perhaps HTTPS should be required, and if HTTP is used, a large warning +message is displayed. + +As for the answered message format, is JSON the assumed structure that +would be used? + + +On 12/18/2011 1:05 PM, Jorge Tim�n wrote: +> If we chose the simple URI proposal namecoin can still be integrated +> to map the IP of the server by those who want to. +> Does it removes the necessity of the certificates? +> If so, we should let people decide between HTTP, HTTPS, namecoin or +> whatever they trust. +> +> Shouldn't we be also discussing the valid format of the answered +> message? I mean fields like "amount", "concept" and such. +> + + |