summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJordan Mack <jordanmack@parhelic.com>2011-12-18 13:18:58 -0800
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2011-12-18 21:19:07 +0000
commit93da05f004d263f2f78fa106a835dc0c7b87c9fd (patch)
treea7459903fba12e94846acb6d9b98489e37e3bd0a
parent1b740ec6e6df1cd8f474be570f34b1a170b5e784 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-93da05f004d263f2f78fa106a835dc0c7b87c9fd.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-93da05f004d263f2f78fa106a835dc0c7b87c9fd.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases
-rw-r--r--75/364b77981d218ae4a363cc30756031363df09191
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/75/364b77981d218ae4a363cc30756031363df091 b/75/364b77981d218ae4a363cc30756031363df091
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..77b4ed947
--- /dev/null
+++ b/75/364b77981d218ae4a363cc30756031363df091
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <jordanmack1981@gmail.com>) id 1RcO8R-0008J7-UM
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:19:07 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.210.175; envelope-from=jordanmack1981@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-iy0-f175.google.com;
+Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175])
+ by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1RcO8R-0004yj-AG
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:19:07 +0000
+Received: by iakh37 with SMTP id h37so4985675iak.34
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:02 -0800 (PST)
+Received: by 10.50.183.233 with SMTP id ep9mr23207243igc.67.1324243142026;
+ Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:02 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from [192.168.0.50] (c-67-188-239-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.
+ [67.188.239.72])
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x18sm60373102ibi.2.2011.12.18.13.18.59
+ (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:00 -0800 (PST)
+Sender: Jordan Mack <jordanmack1981@gmail.com>
+Message-ID: <4EEE58C2.1040908@parhelic.com>
+Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:18:58 -0800
+From: Jordan Mack <jordanmack@parhelic.com>
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
+ rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+References: <1323728469.78044.YahooMailNeo@web121012.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+ <1323979147.27319.140661012141129@webmail.messagingengine.com>
+ <4EEB7E98.8030006@dot-bit.org>
+ <CAJna-HjXp4XEHnbmX0HKsMDmnxoWQQMmqujN+D9nLV0Zz_omcg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <4EEBBD84.6020907@dot-bit.org>
+ <CAJ1JLtuhwdBC8jJsmS3pTUixdLwh0haB-Gq_CdEmEWYN0-z+QA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAGQP0AH+J5Jo524o+EL9zNdHgpfTorTsyB+Ut4x0W-d9x84JZQ@mail.gmail.com>
+In-Reply-To: <CAGQP0AH+J5Jo524o+EL9zNdHgpfTorTsyB+Ut4x0W-d9x84JZQ@mail.gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (jordanmack1981[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
+ digit (jordanmack1981[at]gmail.com)
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1RcO8R-0004yj-AG
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:19:08 -0000
+
+I can't speak for Namecoin. As for the HTTPS requirement, I'm on the
+fence. Without it, the resolution is open to a man in the middle attack.
+Perhaps HTTPS should be required, and if HTTP is used, a large warning
+message is displayed.
+
+As for the answered message format, is JSON the assumed structure that
+would be used?
+
+
+On 12/18/2011 1:05 PM, Jorge Tim�n wrote:
+> If we chose the simple URI proposal namecoin can still be integrated
+> to map the IP of the server by those who want to.
+> Does it removes the necessity of the certificates?
+> If so, we should let people decide between HTTP, HTTPS, namecoin or
+> whatever they trust.
+>
+> Shouldn't we be also discussing the valid format of the answered
+> message? I mean fields like "amount", "concept" and such.
+>
+
+