summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>2015-06-19 12:49:40 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-06-19 10:49:48 +0000
commit8e30fb284771130f78ff445cd32ce276bb81278b (patch)
tree546f93efa5247139c7ff0076613c366a48630e00
parent6058be4b7a5270c8385d60d5f9e0aa8354fac19e (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-8e30fb284771130f78ff445cd32ce276bb81278b.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-8e30fb284771130f78ff445cd32ce276bb81278b.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mailman incompatibility with DKIM ...
-rw-r--r--69/6e575e356628cb6f35818dc0e1c6bf49cd3d03139
1 files changed, 139 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/69/6e575e356628cb6f35818dc0e1c6bf49cd3d03 b/69/6e575e356628cb6f35818dc0e1c6bf49cd3d03
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8de8d9c02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/69/6e575e356628cb6f35818dc0e1c6bf49cd3d03
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1Z5trn-0007TE-WA
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:49:48 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.212.182; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-wi0-f182.google.com;
+Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1Z5trm-0006r9-OQ
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:49:47 +0000
+Received: by wibee9 with SMTP id ee9so5798853wib.0
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.181.11.193 with SMTP id ek1mr5440356wid.15.1434710980751;
+ Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
+Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
+Received: by 10.28.14.196 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAEz79PriNzD18Es60=2Nkz5U6G=Ocrm9ezJmK0P1DirdP-vPkw@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CAEz79PoDn+-aDkqSfPeQFUjYDEDEhSrJ2mFYcbitHBf4oADBSg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CANEZrP3vut8uYWeeynLdwvSM56eXZZdgidaEgcvg1FNMye6P9w@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAEz79Pr4ug8zyJ5bibCG3m0YD8gkBiXysWJsZDThTiwXsgd7YQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CANEZrP1T3r=VDRBTM_jrm_g0BkQy_NZA40BPcZtVDq_0au6TKw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAEz79PriNzD18Es60=2Nkz5U6G=Ocrm9ezJmK0P1DirdP-vPkw@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:49:40 +0200
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: _yEqav0kGtQUXsWvwyLID47DaQw
+Message-ID: <CANEZrP30FfSawHFwpf4v1Eg2bHKT7q=hFAaxQhPcMY_eJtCZMQ@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
+To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bdeda5cf8ab0518dcae5b
+X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1Z5trm-0006r9-OQ
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mailman incompatibility with DKIM ...
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:49:48 -0000
+
+--f46d043bdeda5cf8ab0518dcae5b
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+
+>
+> Mailman isn't resigning it. Should it be? Does other mailing list
+> software?
+>
+
+Mailman must take responsibility for the mail itself. It doesn't have to
+actually sign with DKIM to do so: for backwards compatibility, spam filters
+fall back to other heuristics to try and figure out the 'owner' of the mail
+if it doesn't use DKIM. Those heuristics can go wrong of course. Ideally
+all mail would be DKIM signed. There's no reason not to do it, really.
+
+Yes mailing lists that edit people's emails resign. For example, from a
+recent message to the bitcoinj list
+
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ *d=googlegroups.com <http://googlegroups.com>*; s=20120806;
+ h=to:from:subject:date:lines:message-id:references:mime-version
+ :content-type:user-agent:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
+ :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
+ :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
+ :list-unsubscribe;
+
+
+
+> I suppose it is somewhat acceptable for us to remove subject tags and
+> footers if we have no choice...
+>
+
+Good email clients can extract the same information from the headers
+anyway. I filter all my mail based on them, and the headers also contain
+unsubscribe instructions. Gmail is capable of using them programmatically.
+
+--f46d043bdeda5cf8ab0518dcae5b
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
+ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left=
+-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;paddi=
+ng-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmai=
+l_quote"><div>Mailman isn&#39;t resigning it.=C2=A0 Should it be?=C2=A0 Doe=
+s other mailing list software?=C2=A0</div></div></div></div></blockquote><d=
+iv><br></div><div>Mailman must take responsibility for the mail itself. It =
+doesn&#39;t have to actually sign with DKIM to do so: for backwards compati=
+bility, spam filters fall back to other heuristics to try and figure out th=
+e &#39;owner&#39; of the mail if it doesn&#39;t use DKIM. Those heuristics =
+can go wrong of course. Ideally all mail would be DKIM signed. There&#39;s =
+no reason not to do it, really.</div><div><br></div><div>Yes mailing lists =
+that edit people&#39;s emails resign. For example, from a recent message to=
+ the bitcoinj list</div><div><br></div><div><pre style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);=
+word-wrap:break-word;white-space:pre-wrap">DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-s=
+ha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed;
+ <b>d=3D<a href=3D"http://googlegroups.com">googlegroups.com</a></b>=
+; s=3D20120806;
+ h=3Dto:from:subject:date:lines:message-id:references:mime-version
+ :content-type:user-agent:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
+ :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-lis=
+t
+ :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
+ :list-unsubscribe;</pre></div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=
+=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;bo=
+rder-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">=
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><spa=
+n><div>I suppose it is somewhat acceptable for us to remove subject tags an=
+d footers if we have no choice...<br></div></span></div></div></div></block=
+quote><div><br></div><div>Good email clients can extract the same informati=
+on from the headers anyway. I filter all my mail based on them, and the hea=
+ders also contain unsubscribe instructions. Gmail is capable of using them =
+programmatically.</div></div></div></div>
+
+--f46d043bdeda5cf8ab0518dcae5b--
+
+