diff options
| author | Odinn Cyberguerrilla <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> | 2014-07-06 23:54:23 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-07-07 06:54:30 +0000 |
| commit | 8dc4ef4f45f8f5cf64cb455e393a033dab506467 (patch) | |
| tree | 261502dafb415c6a22a1452d1d7465d8de7e597c | |
| parent | 7485cec57df6552a3a2c70b17e65d5575027586e (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-8dc4ef4f45f8f5cf64cb455e393a033dab506467.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-8dc4ef4f45f8f5cf64cb455e393a033dab506467.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4?
| -rw-r--r-- | 42/c38cba7645051f18cff957bc1cbb6768291f55 | 97 |
1 files changed, 97 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/42/c38cba7645051f18cff957bc1cbb6768291f55 b/42/c38cba7645051f18cff957bc1cbb6768291f55 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..722ae7769 --- /dev/null +++ b/42/c38cba7645051f18cff957bc1cbb6768291f55 @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>) id 1X42oo-00028H-V4 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 07 Jul 2014 06:54:30 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of riseup.net + designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) + client-ip=198.252.153.129; + envelope-from=odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net; + helo=mx1.riseup.net; +Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) + (Exim 4.76) id 1X42on-0004ra-78 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 07 Jul 2014 06:54:30 +0000 +Received: from fruiteater.riseup.net (fruiteater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.74]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (Client CN "*.riseup.net", + Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified)) + by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D014ACDC; + Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:54:23 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + (Authenticated sender: odinn.cyberguerrilla@fruiteater.riseup.net) + with ESMTPSA id EF14EE63 +Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) + (SquirrelMail authenticated user odinn.cyberguerrilla) + by fruiteater.riseup.net with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:54:23 -0700 +Message-ID: <482f7271864acb611912b0ed901ad601.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net> +In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJDPnz-JYbhTZw2cLVb1QrerrHVim9GRBdgVPsOeTLFJ+Q@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CA+s+GJDSPS=zsM64wHaG1CucHVkO==L1QkHYiciUo9iJ-RADng@mail.gmail.com> + <CA+s+GJAei15doCg-h2BK6tEvfwy5m5YHPhg_+8b=G4ew41Mqjw@mail.gmail.com> + <4f55608991d5377117ecf1728cd8db0c.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net> + <CA+s+GJDPnz-JYbhTZw2cLVb1QrerrHVim9GRBdgVPsOeTLFJ+Q@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:54:23 -0700 +From: "Odinn Cyberguerrilla" <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> +To: "Wladimir" <laanwj@gmail.com> +User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 +X-Priority: 3 (Normal) +Importance: Normal +X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mx1 +X-Virus-Status: Clean +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + no trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid + 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay + lines +X-Headers-End: 1X42on-0004ra-78 +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4? +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 06:54:31 -0000 + +> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Odinn Cyberguerrilla +> <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote: +>> Wait, I thought SOCKS4 was supposed to help somehow in terms of +>> prevention +>> of leaking of information? +> +> SOCKS4a (unlike SOCKS4) supports doing DNS lookups on the server, but +> it is not supported by bitcoin core. So it is not part of this +> discussion. +> +> And SOCKS5 can do all of that just as well. But if you feel like +> contributing SOCKS4a support that's fine with me. +> +> Wladimir +> + +OK, thanks Wladimir. + + + |