diff options
author | Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io> | 2013-05-20 16:59:39 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2013-05-21 00:31:23 +0000 |
commit | 86f2bc39f5881150a96876ab06462b512484e5d8 (patch) | |
tree | f5bae6d14af764837eab67e708ab4f32f46de2cc | |
parent | 2e985da24544338d923a7e1fef6e9ba7d325e841 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-86f2bc39f5881150a96876ab06462b512484e5d8.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-86f2bc39f5881150a96876ab06462b512484e5d8.zip |
[Bitcoin-development] UUID to identify chains (payment protocol and elsewhere)
-rw-r--r-- | 98/8631430fd82f6b3ea64faf91afe6aa38f9c4d7 | 119 |
1 files changed, 119 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/98/8631430fd82f6b3ea64faf91afe6aa38f9c4d7 b/98/8631430fd82f6b3ea64faf91afe6aa38f9c4d7 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b19cd4d19 --- /dev/null +++ b/98/8631430fd82f6b3ea64faf91afe6aa38f9c4d7 @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1UeaU7-0003Ot-AF + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 21 May 2013 00:31:23 +0000 +Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1UeaU4-0008OV-0C + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 21 May 2013 00:31:23 +0000 +Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id o6so56053oag.30 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Mon, 20 May 2013 17:31:14 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=google.com; s=20120113; + h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to + :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; + bh=bTKXYi6oHKpI2XmL+t8Q/EjrxCiNGu3WPYY8AOiMPZU=; + b=ejQtVufwaCMLP+zPEAIhNvBHLQJHKdbCKTbkskcOKm09te1SSR8cl/Shjwjsm/Ia+q + h1XF6C6f3LWT40heKIG4TyTPUCGQ8sA10sDfEDwQJK5IIuo9xM9MRXhTS65r1D5UUdSS + 20sxUehMoBxx9hPS8hp7c9rARxJYjVzI1OdW20YyfGC4Fx5TGSrsmtBtguG74cY3hmkH + WQ9sOqNrL74aaLdk4QgmpFSQM7YeJk5Jcrqfyezgu8EUyJWlZvJE+xe6borSe+HBqg7c + RbeoeQo4hAeWeWMxjHkoDGlFtrgh8ZR7ywJIZeUM37UnycS+0zFTnzpCnV1x/fgoni1U + 78AQ== +X-Received: by 10.60.99.10 with SMTP id em10mr5855100oeb.58.1369094380511; + Mon, 20 May 2013 16:59:40 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from [192.168.1.118] (adsl-71-131-176-204.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net. + [71.131.176.204]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c20sm108422oez.4.2013.05.20.16.59.38 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> + (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); + Mon, 20 May 2013 16:59:39 -0700 (PDT) +Message-ID: <519AB8EB.5000103@monetize.io> +Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:59:39 -0700 +From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io> +Organization: Monetize.io Inc. +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; + rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9Vx2Jty7f0H7+1w+ScJlBEEdX/s6dUUmurzzKJ0YtSlmos3Y1A07sJM/mZqTnQ9XllhGl +X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. +X-Headers-End: 1UeaU4-0008OV-0C +Subject: [Bitcoin-development] UUID to identify chains (payment protocol and + elsewhere) +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 00:31:23 -0000 + +At the developer round-table it was asked if the payment protocol would +alt-chains, and Gavin noted that it has a UTF-8 encoded string +identifying the network ("main" or "test"). As someone with two +proposals in the works which also require chain/coin identification (one +for merged mining, one for colored coins), I am opinionated on this. I +believe that we need a standard mechanism for identifying chains, and +one which avoids the trap of maintaining a standard registry of +string-to-chain mappings. + +Any chain can be uniquely identified by its genesis block, 122 random +bits is more than sufficient for uniquely tagging chains/colored assets, +and the low-order 16-bytes of the block's hash are effectively random. +With these facts in mind, I propose that we identify chains by UUID. + +So as to remain reasonably compliant with RFC 4122, I recommend that we +use Version 4 (random) UUIDs, with the random bits extracted from the +double-SHA256 hash of the genesis block of the chain. (For colored +coins, the colored coin definition transaction would be used instead, +but I will address that in a separate proposal and will say just one +thing about it: adopting this method for identifying chains/coins will +greatly assist in adopting the payment protocol to colored coins.) + +The following Python code illustrates how to construct the chain +identifier from the serialized genesis block: + + from hashlib import sha256 + from uuid import UUID + def chain_uuid(serialized_genesis_block): + h = sha256(serialized_genesis_block).digest() + h = sha256(h).digest() + h = h[:16] + h = ''.join([ + h[:6], + chr(0x40 | ord(h[6]) & 0x0f), + h[7], + chr(0x80 | ord(h[8]) & 0x3f), + h[9:] + ]) + return UUID(bytes=h) + +And some example chain identifiers: + + mainnet: UUID('6fe28c0a-b6f1-4372-81a6-a246ae63f74f') + testnet3: UUID('43497fd7-f826-4571-88f4-a30fd9cec3ae') + namecoin: UUID('70c7a9f0-a2fb-4d48-a635-a70d5b157c80') + +As for encoding the chain identifier, the simplest method is to give +"network" the "bytes" type, but defining a "UUID" message type is also +possible. In either case bitcoin mainnet would be the default, so the +extra 12 bytes (vs: "main" or "test") would only be an issue for +alt-chains or colored coins. + +Kind regards, +Mark Friedenbach + + |