diff options
| author | Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com> | 2014-03-28 16:26:57 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-03-28 15:27:05 +0000 |
| commit | 7ea5273414d366ad42be74eba65e2372743ba751 (patch) | |
| tree | 1cefd28078686749e8cb7967f940bfc6cde63984 | |
| parent | 21b56371342f62f4d29b165bf805e45ae7ed66d0 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-7ea5273414d366ad42be74eba65e2372743ba751.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-7ea5273414d366ad42be74eba65e2372743ba751.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 70 refund field
| -rw-r--r-- | 24/0c289db82cd288114c56b930ff401001fc7ec1 | 92 |
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/24/0c289db82cd288114c56b930ff401001fc7ec1 b/24/0c289db82cd288114c56b930ff401001fc7ec1 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..189e7e430 --- /dev/null +++ b/24/0c289db82cd288114c56b930ff401001fc7ec1 @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <tamas@bitsofproof.com>) id 1WTYgT-0000s7-Qk + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:05 +0000 +X-ACL-Warn: +Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) + (Exim 4.76) id 1WTYgS-00016w-DS + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:05 +0000 +Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.2.2]); authenticated + by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa + (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) + id 1WTYgL-0005Pn-Mt; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:26:57 +0100 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; + boundary="Apple-Mail=_6E55C40D-D6B4-42D6-9654-13E85CC61413"; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 +Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) +From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com> +In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP26+hWJaFYkZ2oUKhr9FQ03CXCdvt8V1Mm4mGJaPCy2Hw@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:26:57 +0100 +Message-Id: <C3A3E8C1-CBAB-4FF7-8944-BE65B41BBDD9@bitsofproof.com> +References: <CANEZrP0AwR3WgHfwYWcrC9Z_MHPDwymWXAQwp7D8XZ+o2FsK8g@mail.gmail.com> + <612FFAAD-14FF-4261-927D-BD2E0F287257@bitsofproof.com> + <D7D06593-1987-490A-8DCD-21922E022E39@bitsofproof.com> + <CABsx9T1POJ3KTqSz_c=SdYTg=EKWa9jqjOpHPZoMoPGXozsvJA@mail.gmail.com> + <85A1792C-502E-4AC6-B8BC-A10C8FC1917F@bitsofproof.com> + <CANEZrP26+hWJaFYkZ2oUKhr9FQ03CXCdvt8V1Mm4mGJaPCy2Hw@mail.gmail.com> +To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> +X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) +X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1396020424; + c6902d7b; +X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. +X-Headers-End: 1WTYgS-00016w-DS +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 70 refund field +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:06 -0000 + + +--Apple-Mail=_6E55C40D-D6B4-42D6-9654-13E85CC61413 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset=us-ascii + +On 28.03.2014, at 16:23, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote: +> So I take it BOPShop won't be supporting BIP70 then? :( +>=20 + +Supporting BIP70 by BitPay or BopShop is a cake since it does no more = +then they did without it. +I am not in opposition but see no reason to be enthusiastic about it. I = +will once the spec goes +further than what was possible before. + +--Apple-Mail=_6E55C40D-D6B4-42D6-9654-13E85CC61413 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Disposition: attachment; + filename=signature.asc +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; + name=signature.asc +Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org + +iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTNZTBAAoJEPZykcUXcTkcfh0H/j4ydr8X93lZqnHf3KDfUP0V +fs8ISyIG7Ms7lesJ5X5lKAtFMMeGKoE2fKjEJZIDfvGaW/EkprAZ+vBY7smDeu6x +9HdcSwBIQx/XxivnSbnviytvwfPrc20q3KjnaIUyhU3jMITn1KmOG/aQHvmulgE0 +7sD5Lf+va1xmJeGfnhU5xFqltNciwtWDolPnLA4KksFTOzhnNFy5IsYsefspNYTt +lgaEunZiXblMeN1eaPTpNcMqlWBPLS5ZaMzmZALXreQwAx/JA+nxc7kBA7XqszXl +y5KLH6uMFCSu7fEnthcvbU3GEPqZt2drGMSEvALo1wIH0VfmbBuCB5i3hJggOCY= +=SBGs +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--Apple-Mail=_6E55C40D-D6B4-42D6-9654-13E85CC61413-- + + |