summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>2011-07-08 08:18:19 +0000
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2011-07-08 08:18:25 +0000
commit7b4c8b7b9f92918dfcd931d7a54937d05166cb64 (patch)
tree17857b8a291913946ebe30574f4b816d6e9e2932
parent53d20924c984b8fc2c60a9a2c0849f5be97b6825 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-7b4c8b7b9f92918dfcd931d7a54937d05166cb64.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-7b4c8b7b9f92918dfcd931d7a54937d05166cb64.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bytes
-rw-r--r--59/3397514300859cbb889c2b20df1d1e59537912121
1 files changed, 121 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/59/3397514300859cbb889c2b20df1d1e59537912 b/59/3397514300859cbb889c2b20df1d1e59537912
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..845640284
--- /dev/null
+++ b/59/3397514300859cbb889c2b20df1d1e59537912
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qf6GX-0007lu-PI
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:18:25 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.161.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-gx0-f175.google.com;
+Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175])
+ by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1Qf6GW-0005rq-Tm
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:18:25 +0000
+Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so911046gxk.34
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.151.8.21 with SMTP id l21mr1690831ybi.186.1310113099541; Fri,
+ 08 Jul 2011 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.151.150.15 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAJNQ0st3ygLHPtq8fa9ceivSC1DQ38Hv+AQRiaXw=aL2Jze33Q@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <20110707111557.GA5231@ulyssis.org> <4E16A567.6020309@justmoon.de>
+ <CAJNQ0st3ygLHPtq8fa9ceivSC1DQ38Hv+AQRiaXw=aL2Jze33Q@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:18:19 +0000
+Message-ID: <CAJNQ0su6MVJ7cz2uQ4ftGPykvYxWH7J7rk5Q0Us6JWM6zoW02Q@mail.gmail.com>
+From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>
+To: Stefan Thomas <moon@justmoon.de>
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd514cce9ebec04a78a795f
+X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
+ digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
+ 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1Qf6GW-0005rq-Tm
+Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bytes
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:18:25 -0000
+
+--000e0cd514cce9ebec04a78a795f
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+
+Sorry, that last message got broken off.
+
+On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Stefan Thomas <moon@justmoon.de> wrote:
+>
+>> Hey Pieter,
+>>
+>> > Otherwise, we could reset testnet (not actually reset, just
+>> > change its addresses a bit), and simply state odd=testnet, even=realnet.
+>>
+>> We could use the XOR hack for now and remove it the next time we reset
+>> testnet. But I do think the 111 is baggage we want to get rid of. Using
+>> the lsb as a simple flag is much cleaner.
+>>
+>
+
+I agree it is cleaner, but I think breaking compatiblity with older address
+(even testnet) is not a good idea right now. It is important to build an
+image of stability and backward compatibility.
+
+So I vote for the XOR 111 hack :)
+
+JS
+
+--000e0cd514cce9ebec04a78a795f
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+Sorry, that last message got broken off.<br>
+<br>
+<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
+n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div class=
+=3D"h5"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Stefan T=
+homas <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:moon@justmoon.de" target=3D"_=
+blank">moon@justmoon.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
+
+<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
+x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey Pieter,<br>
+<div><br>
+&gt; Otherwise, we could reset testnet (not actually reset, just<br>
+&gt; change its addresses a bit), and simply state odd=3Dtestnet, even=3Dre=
+alnet.<br>
+<br>
+</div>We could use the XOR hack for now and remove it the next time we rese=
+t<br>
+testnet. But I do think the 111 is baggage we want to get rid of. Using<br>
+the lsb as a simple flag is much cleaner.<br></blockquote></div></div></div=
+></blockquote><div><br><br>
+I agree it is cleaner, but I think breaking compatiblity with older address=
+ (even testnet) is not a good idea right now. It is important to build an i=
+mage of stability and backward compatibility.<br><br>So I vote for the XOR =
+111 hack :)<br>
+<br>JS<br><br></div></div>
+
+--000e0cd514cce9ebec04a78a795f--
+
+