diff options
author | John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com> | 2011-07-08 08:18:19 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2011-07-08 08:18:25 +0000 |
commit | 7b4c8b7b9f92918dfcd931d7a54937d05166cb64 (patch) | |
tree | 17857b8a291913946ebe30574f4b816d6e9e2932 | |
parent | 53d20924c984b8fc2c60a9a2c0849f5be97b6825 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-7b4c8b7b9f92918dfcd931d7a54937d05166cb64.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-7b4c8b7b9f92918dfcd931d7a54937d05166cb64.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bytes
-rw-r--r-- | 59/3397514300859cbb889c2b20df1d1e59537912 | 121 |
1 files changed, 121 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/59/3397514300859cbb889c2b20df1d1e59537912 b/59/3397514300859cbb889c2b20df1d1e59537912 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..845640284 --- /dev/null +++ b/59/3397514300859cbb889c2b20df1d1e59537912 @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qf6GX-0007lu-PI + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:18:25 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.161.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com; + helo=mail-gx0-f175.google.com; +Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1Qf6GW-0005rq-Tm + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:18:25 +0000 +Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so911046gxk.34 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.151.8.21 with SMTP id l21mr1690831ybi.186.1310113099541; Fri, + 08 Jul 2011 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.151.150.15 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAJNQ0st3ygLHPtq8fa9ceivSC1DQ38Hv+AQRiaXw=aL2Jze33Q@mail.gmail.com> +References: <20110707111557.GA5231@ulyssis.org> <4E16A567.6020309@justmoon.de> + <CAJNQ0st3ygLHPtq8fa9ceivSC1DQ38Hv+AQRiaXw=aL2Jze33Q@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:18:19 +0000 +Message-ID: <CAJNQ0su6MVJ7cz2uQ4ftGPykvYxWH7J7rk5Q0Us6JWM6zoW02Q@mail.gmail.com> +From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com> +To: Stefan Thomas <moon@justmoon.de> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd514cce9ebec04a78a795f +X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in + digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) + 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1Qf6GW-0005rq-Tm +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bytes +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:18:25 -0000 + +--000e0cd514cce9ebec04a78a795f +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 + +Sorry, that last message got broken off. + +On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Stefan Thomas <moon@justmoon.de> wrote: +> +>> Hey Pieter, +>> +>> > Otherwise, we could reset testnet (not actually reset, just +>> > change its addresses a bit), and simply state odd=testnet, even=realnet. +>> +>> We could use the XOR hack for now and remove it the next time we reset +>> testnet. But I do think the 111 is baggage we want to get rid of. Using +>> the lsb as a simple flag is much cleaner. +>> +> + +I agree it is cleaner, but I think breaking compatiblity with older address +(even testnet) is not a good idea right now. It is important to build an +image of stability and backward compatibility. + +So I vote for the XOR 111 hack :) + +JS + +--000e0cd514cce9ebec04a78a795f +Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +Sorry, that last message got broken off.<br> +<br> +<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi= +n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div class= +=3D"h5"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Stefan T= +homas <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:moon@justmoon.de" target=3D"_= +blank">moon@justmoon.de</a>></span> wrote:<br> + +<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= +x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey Pieter,<br> +<div><br> +> Otherwise, we could reset testnet (not actually reset, just<br> +> change its addresses a bit), and simply state odd=3Dtestnet, even=3Dre= +alnet.<br> +<br> +</div>We could use the XOR hack for now and remove it the next time we rese= +t<br> +testnet. But I do think the 111 is baggage we want to get rid of. Using<br> +the lsb as a simple flag is much cleaner.<br></blockquote></div></div></div= +></blockquote><div><br><br> +I agree it is cleaner, but I think breaking compatiblity with older address= + (even testnet) is not a good idea right now. It is important to build an i= +mage of stability and backward compatibility.<br><br>So I vote for the XOR = +111 hack :)<br> +<br>JS<br><br></div></div> + +--000e0cd514cce9ebec04a78a795f-- + + |