diff options
| author | Nick Johnson <nick@ethereum.org> | 2017-06-07 13:25:35 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2017-06-07 13:25:48 +0000 |
| commit | 77e3c59737be1fb01e2aaf88141200c1ece2fa35 (patch) | |
| tree | 55c139252808c30b26db13682ab6fdb230a17036 | |
| parent | bae552d81e813c1aaae71d6ee9e7c0da82bc2792 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-77e3c59737be1fb01e2aaf88141200c1ece2fa35.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-77e3c59737be1fb01e2aaf88141200c1ece2fa35.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable
| -rw-r--r-- | b4/f8b4b2c3399a71803e0e683be23ff6338a4bdb | 120 |
1 files changed, 120 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b4/f8b4b2c3399a71803e0e683be23ff6338a4bdb b/b4/f8b4b2c3399a71803e0e683be23ff6338a4bdb new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6cd3057fb --- /dev/null +++ b/b4/f8b4b2c3399a71803e0e683be23ff6338a4bdb @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +Return-Path: <nick@ethereum.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D79BCA + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:25:48 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com (mail-wr0-f172.google.com + [209.85.128.172]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754BCE2 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:25:47 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-wr0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q97so6169922wrb.2 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:25:47 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ethereum.org; s=google; + h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc; bh=k/qyqF2O1v9+6IGbyHhnjuRogBVKiOEbmvFJFyhcciE=; + b=VBFrufMa2fNlCsZQHc+P0x5VgO8K9kH0MaXGG6JuUsv+zf/cyezqvzYQYXzlssr8J4 + kT5IAAIitS9ermLOQ7qpo+pg613UUdpOeeasLoV07zwaLG7YlF1eZnVE5yhoEEO5J3WP + yQh1G0bhg7PTILExdvdgPRy78MLiC6M1vIgws= +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date + :message-id:subject:to:cc; + bh=k/qyqF2O1v9+6IGbyHhnjuRogBVKiOEbmvFJFyhcciE=; + b=LCD84i7t6PmVI7PtFz7/q2bu3xJwpSDUypFUCg+IrfRTTsgo9IlFN4y45Iq/spuyzi + KVhotuBrNy/tRddtSsQjexewqEW8PU+5SKpj2i2J3KFR0dC2zMmw8MKCmvmcmnm45HVV + s5xlmQr/ODYYgNEuq0i21Jh5jiwq+Ep4wVmeBPVRYycnsSnz3tcQkuD7tqLCzCeOlUTu + oNSCvjz5IOxrzDvGEuLe0Wyd73RpfPnrvgg16w+T5S6gzgR90XKIUyLK9mvTTU0Zv+hd + iPNt9BkiFM9GWQXs8m3QLIGjK9LBM2uEAF4XfHxuLf3JGK8jRnul0ymmfu8KtCkKBIYo + gi4Q== +X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcC5b2CGHWiPR8qiVhMPKhnEmZi7kgLqplAXt92je329LZybo+e5 + Rb8afLb4KZrNyp2EsO6BrCJW2QHfRHeT +X-Received: by 10.223.154.233 with SMTP id a96mr20983971wrc.139.1496841946098; + Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:25:46 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +References: <31833011-7179-49D1-A07E-8FD9556C4534@taoeffect.com> + <CAAS2fgSU+UtbJSSAhf0-Sd0GH-RGnZmv+WHWtFV2zHFW2q6_yg@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSU+UtbJSSAhf0-Sd0GH-RGnZmv+WHWtFV2zHFW2q6_yg@mail.gmail.com> +From: Nick Johnson <nick@ethereum.org> +Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:25:35 +0000 +Message-ID: <CAFz7pMuQTdUBmOOB7aPrgkDNZvQTn_jfantfLQQVWoerD=D2Kg@mail.gmail.com> +To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>, Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f4eb27b9d4d05515eacb4" +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, HTML_MESSAGE, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:31:34 +0000 +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:25:48 -0000 + +--f403045f4eb27b9d4d05515eacb4 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" + +On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:02 AM Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Tao Effect via bitcoin-dev +> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +> > I believe the severity of replay attacks is going unvoiced and is not +> > understood within the bitcoin community because of their lack of +> experience +> > with them. +> +> Please don't insult our community-- the issues with replay were +> pointed out by us to Ethereum in advance and were cited specifically +> in prior hardfork discussions long before Ethereum started editing +> their ledger for the economic benefit of its centralized +> administrators. + + +Please don't spread misinformation. Whatever you think of the DAO hard +fork, it's a simple fact that the Ethereum ledger was not edited. + +-Nick Johnson + +--f403045f4eb27b9d4d05515eacb4 +Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Wed, Jun 7,= + 2017 at 12:02 AM Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bit= +coin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</= +a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 = +0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 a= +t 10:39 PM, Tao Effect via bitcoin-dev<br> +<<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bla= +nk">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br> +> I believe the severity of replay attacks is going unvoiced and is not<= +br> +> understood within the bitcoin community because of their lack of exper= +ience<br> +> with them.<br> +<br> +Please don't insult our community-- the issues with replay were<br> +pointed out by us to Ethereum in advance and were cited specifically<br> +in prior hardfork discussions long before Ethereum started editing<br> +their ledger for the economic benefit of its centralized<br> +administrators.</blockquote><div>=C2=A0=C2=A0</div><div>Please don't sp= +read misinformation. Whatever you think of the DAO hard fork, it's a si= +mple fact that the Ethereum ledger was not edited.</div><div><br></div><div= +>-Nick Johnson</div></div></div> + +--f403045f4eb27b9d4d05515eacb4-- + |