diff options
| author | Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> | 2015-08-19 19:21:06 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-20 00:21:08 +0000 |
| commit | 6fb4514b1a2d875b2fcb3257a4a39e7fbb0e0152 (patch) | |
| tree | 324309b2259fde685f89ae91ab2995816b32fa7a | |
| parent | 9fc7c3f5b019d06a52bae358682194c5c2b3096e (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-6fb4514b1a2d875b2fcb3257a4a39e7fbb0e0152.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-6fb4514b1a2d875b2fcb3257a4a39e7fbb0e0152.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Separated bitcoin-consensus mailing list (was Re: Bitcoin XT Fork)
| -rw-r--r-- | ec/66abb72d0b3aaebf6da1dc8f96d5273d240344 | 140 |
1 files changed, 140 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ec/66abb72d0b3aaebf6da1dc8f96d5273d240344 b/ec/66abb72d0b3aaebf6da1dc8f96d5273d240344 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b921a2f4e --- /dev/null +++ b/ec/66abb72d0b3aaebf6da1dc8f96d5273d240344 @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B319E7 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:21:08 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com + [209.85.223.176]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91EA610D + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:21:07 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by iods203 with SMTP id s203so28590188iod.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:21:07 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=yFUZBiePVG6N3dCDaXu71WbAbys1+ccn9OWgmFpAGQ0=; + b=ZON9eY9WPD1+tDDaOsKPJT4jUQnyiZVCFqO5RpwwQBpfNPYIvxTIRu4B8W5jVXiX/R + +6TZYzIGk/w5LXjD3w6UWzwUtfFUu5AqdOMR+S4zj/e7cISvyk2fdbO1KtMIrPMnfR4I + hvmeqjwMKYKywZjZY/hyC68WWs06IzLG40VJhDGzs6aRXrQ0JK8pcC7Br2PNtSZbhnJn + h/9OxUQOEmxcLuXMlzW5z1w55mIQhVWh6zFaTx5iaY76MzjVPKVyAoNCgPFlY7Hmxycg + ny1+A5xcrPUZ7sxpkbDqLC2kcWutSRySXybSj94INaCzbJ81FbQKiYSd9cUmxHCOO6xb + wHvA== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.107.30.13 with SMTP id e13mr206297ioe.57.1440030067097; Wed, + 19 Aug 2015 17:21:07 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.36.91.135 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:21:06 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDpYdBjyCB=Dor0eE-FdPv9PbVXzWyJf0BPyQ4SDm9VznQ@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CABm2gDpYdBjyCB=Dor0eE-FdPv9PbVXzWyJf0BPyQ4SDm9VznQ@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:21:06 -0500 +Message-ID: <CABaSBawX26u9XJRPdoYnPpSgG85P4pr917fjUuxhmPnO8Ek5rw@mail.gmail.com> +From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> +To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>, + Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141a5109d8638051db320dc +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Separated bitcoin-consensus mailing list (was Re: + Bitcoin XT Fork) +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:21:08 -0000 + +--001a1141a5109d8638051db320dc +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> Apparently that existed already: http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman= +/ +> But technical people run away from noise while non-technical people +> chase them wherever their voices sounds more loud. +> + +FWIW, and I mentioned this opinion in #bitcoin-dev on IRC, but I am +perfectly fine with receiving everything through a single mailing list. I +used to read the Wikipedia firehose of recent edits because I thought +that's how you were supposed to use the site. Edits per second eventually +reached beyond any reasonable estimate of human capacity and then I +realized what was going on. Any sort of "glorious future" for bitcoin with +hundreds of millions of users will also see this problem for future +developers, even if only 0.1% of that population are money-interested +programmers then that's 100,000 programmers to work with. I would never +want to turn off this raw feed. Having said that, I am somewhat surprise +that nobody has taken to weekly summaries of research and development +activity. Summarizing recent work is a valuable task that others can engage +in just by reading the mailing list and aggregating multiple thoughts +together, similar to release notes. I was also expecting to see something +like "individual developer's summaries of things they have found +interesting over the past 30-90 days or past year" digging up arcane +details from the mailing list archives, or more infrequent summaries of the +other smaller batched review emails. Digest mode mailing list consumption +is often recommended to those who are uninterested in dealing with low +signal-to-noise, but I suspect that summarizing activity would be more +valuable for this community, especially for the different cognitive niches +that have developed. + +- Bryan +http://heybryan.org/ +1 512 203 0507 + +--001a1141a5109d8638051db320dc +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W= +ed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href= +=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin= +-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class= +=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd= +ing-left:1ex"><div id=3D":3sw" class=3D"a3s" style=3D"overflow:hidden">Appa= +rently that existed already: <a href=3D"http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/ma= +ilman/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://sourceforge.net/p/bitco= +in/mailman/</a><br> +But technical people run away from noise while non-technical people<br> +chase them wherever their voices sounds more loud.<br></div></blockquote></= +div><br>FWIW, and I mentioned this opinion in #bitcoin-dev on IRC, but I am= + perfectly fine with receiving everything through a single mailing list. I = +used to read the Wikipedia firehose of recent edits because I thought that&= +#39;s how you were supposed to use the site. Edits per second eventually re= +ached beyond any reasonable estimate of human capacity and then I realized = +what was going on. Any sort of "glorious future" for bitcoin with= + hundreds of millions of users will also see this problem for future develo= +pers, even if only 0.1% of that population are money-interested programmers= + then that's 100,000 programmers to work with. I would never want to tu= +rn off this raw feed. Having said that, I am somewhat surprise that nobody = +has taken to weekly summaries of research and development activity. Summari= +zing recent work is a valuable task that others can engage in just by readi= +ng the mailing list and aggregating multiple thoughts together, similar to = +release notes. I was also expecting to see something like "individual = +developer's summaries of things they have found interesting over the pa= +st 30-90 days or past year" digging up arcane details from the mailing= + list archives, or more infrequent summaries of the other smaller batched r= +eview emails. Digest mode mailing list consumption is often recommended to = +those who are uninterested in dealing with low signal-to-noise, but I suspe= +ct that summarizing activity would be more valuable for this community, esp= +ecially for the different cognitive niches that have developed.<br><div><br= +></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">- Bryan<br><a href=3D"http://heybryan= +.org/" target=3D"_blank">http://heybryan.org/</a><br>1 512 203 0507</div> +</div></div> + +--001a1141a5109d8638051db320dc-- + |