+Return-Path: <aymeric@peersm.com>

+Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])

+ by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E5BC002D

+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;

+ Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:22:55 +0000 (UTC)

+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])

+ by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84822612C0

+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;

+ Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:22:55 +0000 (UTC)

+DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 84822612C0

+X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org

+X-Spam-Flag: NO

+X-Spam-Score: -1.901

+X-Spam-Level:

+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5

+ tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,

+ SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no

+Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])

+ by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)

+ with ESMTP id 3ieWWaTzB6tE

+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;

+ Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:22:54 +0000 (UTC)

+X-Greylist: delayed 00:29:59 by SQLgrey-1.8.0

+DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org DDF8860B1B

+Received: from 3.mo552.mail-out.ovh.net (3.mo552.mail-out.ovh.net

+ [178.33.254.192])

+ by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF8860B1B

+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;

+ Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:22:53 +0000 (UTC)

+Received: from mxplan6.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.16.193])

+ by mo552.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F40A29B0E;

+ Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:43:44 +0000 (UTC)

+Received: from peersm.com (37.59.142.108) by DAG6EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.52)

+ with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,

+ cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.17; Fri, 27 Jan

+ 2023 16:43:43 +0100

+Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass

+ (GARM-108S00299aa4309-0001-4170-b5d3-0afe3da003b4,

+ DA236FF0B6BD416D54A909F942041FB942067809) smtp.auth=aymeric@peersm.com

+X-OVh-ClientIp: 92.184.102.76

+To: Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion

+ <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, Robert Dickinson

+ <robert.lee.dickinson@gmail.com>

+References: <CABHetKwan91zqm=0y=_84vG7ffveWTPYONZP_hLQx5o40iAnuQ@mail.gmail.com>

+ <Y9PPvBiWOXpBefmD@camus>

+From: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>

+Message-ID: <3e3acd36-44d7-6823-4eb6-69affe111204@peersm.com>

+Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:43:46 +0100

+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101

+ Thunderbird/45.4.0

+MIME-Version: 1.0

+In-Reply-To: <Y9PPvBiWOXpBefmD@camus>

+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.108]

+X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG2EX1.mxp6.local (172.16.2.11) To DAG6EX2.mxp6.local

+ (172.16.2.52)

+X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: a125761d-07b2-4533-91c4-d2a14f7d6d96

+X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 17379390964935123933

+X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK

+X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100

+X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedruddviedgjeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfhisehtqhertddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpeethihmvghrihgtucggihhtthgvuceorgihmhgvrhhitgesphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvledugeekhedtheekuddvgffhkedtgedtueejgeffveeghfdvvdeffeeltdfftdenucffohhmrghinhepphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmpdhlihhnkhgvughinhdrtghomhdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdefjedrheelrddugedvrddutdeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddvjedrtddrtddruddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeorgihmhgvrhhitgesphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmqedpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehrohgsvghrthdrlhgvvgdrughitghkihhnshhonhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdpsghithgtohhinhdquggvvheslhhishhtshdrlhhinhhugihfohhunhgurghtihhonhdrohhrghdprghpohgvlhhsthhrrgesfihpshhofhhtfigrrhgvrdhnvghtpdfovfetjfhoshhtpehmohehhedvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth

+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:24:35 +0000

+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits

+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org

+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15

+Precedence: list

+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>

+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>

+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>

+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>

+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>

+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:22:55 -0000

+

+

+

+Le 27/01/2023 =E0 14:21, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev a =E9crit :

+> if people were storing NFTs and other crap on the

+> chain, then the Bitcoin fee market would become entangled with random

+> pump&dump markets

+So you mean that Bitcoin is out for NFTs, Metaverse and "web3"?

+

+LN is good but I don't think it can really adapt to everything, what I

+proposed yesterday looks complementary

+

+I clearly dislike the current NFTs existing systems, and to make it

+short NFTs as a whole until recently, it depends on what people mean by

+"NFT", and I did dislike any solution based on OP_RETURN (shxtty stuff

+flooding bitcoin with stupid proofs of nothing)

+

+BUT I changed my mind, one can say that I am contradicting myself

+everywhere (links in the proposals), but no, explaining why in the propos=

+als

+

+Note that in my proposals you don't need to "mint" the NFTs (using a

+third party but not a stupid ethereum/bitcoin like super sidechain) and

+that you can reference millions of them in one transaction (low value

+NFTs like loyalty programms, discount coupons) in that case of course

+the low value NFTs are centralized

+

+That's the future, Bitcoin being out of this does not look plausible,

+currently NOBODY envisions bitcoin or LN for a web3 system, so people

+here might destroy my proposals, then please do, but I find them quite

+good compared to whatever exist

+

+=20

+

+--=20

+Sophia-Antipolis, France

+CV: https://www.peersm.com/CVAV.pdf

+LinkedIn: https://fr.linkedin.com/in/aymeric-vitte-05855b26

+GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms

+A Universal Coin Swap system based on Bitcoin: https://gist.github.com/Ay=

+ms/029125db2583e1cf9c3209769eb2cdd7

+A bitcoin NFT system: https://gist.github.com/Ayms/01dbfebf219965054b4a3b=

+eed1bfeba7

+Move your coins by yourself (browser version): https://peersm.com/wallet

+Bitcoin transactions made simple: https://github.com/Ayms/bitcoin-transac=

+tions

+torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live

+node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor

+Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist: http://torrent-live.p=

+eersm.com

+Peersm : http://www.peersm.com

+

+

+