diff options
| author | Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com> | 2015-08-14 01:34:03 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-13 16:34:25 +0000 |
| commit | 6950bce1bff2574618354c7054bf45f59f1f1212 (patch) | |
| tree | b183196fbc9dfd63e6bc41d31b0b75738dd0bf55 | |
| parent | 5ed22b8ad211860d63b09a2ada60017df226dae5 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-6950bce1bff2574618354c7054bf45f59f1f1212.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-6950bce1bff2574618354c7054bf45f59f1f1212.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for relative locktime (Btc Drak)
| -rw-r--r-- | 8e/863cf60532bc650aca3a8438c74bcb6299f77f | 76 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/8e/863cf60532bc650aca3a8438c74bcb6299f77f b/8e/863cf60532bc650aca3a8438c74bcb6299f77f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d43242a04 --- /dev/null +++ b/8e/863cf60532bc650aca3a8438c74bcb6299f77f @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +Return-Path: <slashene@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141CC895 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:34:25 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com + [209.85.215.50]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD5515F + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:34:24 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so29202535lag.3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:34:22 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; + bh=73DzmDqF45Z1Nxz0A8yOk0Ltr5Mnwh73I9eNRJRV5aY=; + b=YBfQSYiONigufrgrCMWE6MW2yXcL4OJPfsEcjQ/lV3j1rYC0DjerwmTWZDGVYYQZF4 + 5wIR1uhpChb6+ApYgY3ItTxngdXcopHrSryd+BstiRpL3aH6y67yywXYmoExNWwCqjBP + UQfZtdafrsDkwPhelYn9rDd2ZKU8qac5sb1VB/65w7wo5Z86BiLK2NinFkTp0+jknk69 + 3zP4kICvEhmd8OXG7EGe/uh5lW1hF0wdE6zznSCvHpa4xjuxzr+F9kGU/1APm69moqOt + xmf9ecin98Yz2Zs/6kHNjTfS/21Fovf5+cqRNIq8CEDHt+FnjC+2eatrlrfEoRrZyUaC + pw5A== +X-Received: by 10.112.63.169 with SMTP id h9mr37131565lbs.104.1439483662626; + Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:34:22 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Sender: slashene@gmail.com +Received: by 10.25.142.15 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:34:03 -0700 (PDT) +From: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com> +Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 01:34:03 +0900 +X-Google-Sender-Auth: ltCAEOnTM96uxFS8hN-8RAZQbdE +Message-ID: <CA+1nnrmkEGHY7HwffbQ4sEG_c2EhCbVK64FtGXSERpGdsxoQZA@mail.gmail.com> +To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3fd125ef647051d33e8c2 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for + relative locktime (Btc Drak) +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:34:25 -0000 + +--001a11c3fd125ef647051d33e8c2 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +Would be wonderful to have this pushed together with CLTV and BIP68. +If BIP68 get pushed in the next fork, this CSV is a no brainer. + +Was there a competing RCLTV implementation somewhere that did not depend on +BIP68 for information ? I don't manage to find it. + +--001a11c3fd125ef647051d33e8c2 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr">Would be wonderful to have this pushed together with CLTV = +and BIP68.<br><div>If BIP68 get pushed in the next fork, this CSV is a no b= +rainer.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Was there a competing RCLTV implementa= +tion somewhere that did not depend on BIP68 for information ? I don't m= +anage to find it.<br></div></div> + +--001a11c3fd125ef647051d33e8c2-- + |