summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>2014-07-17 16:34:21 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2014-07-17 23:34:29 +0000
commit667e785875174a40c035baba614af9692de86bae (patch)
tree6146e6e82ecf759a828dc94e813fdb5fff0ed90b
parent069892fb7565beaf2df7eba8b7d5aae48219a05b (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-667e785875174a40c035baba614af9692de86bae.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-667e785875174a40c035baba614af9692de86bae.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Squashing redundant tx data in blocks on the wire
-rw-r--r--1a/b9b07199cd6566e04f79a5f3477f7dfeed5a8e79
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/1a/b9b07199cd6566e04f79a5f3477f7dfeed5a8e b/1a/b9b07199cd6566e04f79a5f3477f7dfeed5a8e
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3b46a0fc9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/1a/b9b07199cd6566e04f79a5f3477f7dfeed5a8e
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1X7vC1-0004vQ-Tl
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:34:29 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.215.43; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-la0-f43.google.com;
+Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com ([209.85.215.43])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1X7vC0-0002t6-Eh
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:34:29 +0000
+Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hr17so2319595lab.16
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.112.16.230 with SMTP id j6mr471801lbd.90.1405640061886; Thu,
+ 17 Jul 2014 16:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.112.35.138 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CA+iPb=EaX=bvOjNtZ+LnYTMRLQQ9nFcrefAkBdv8eActoX_b8A@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CA+iPb=EaX=bvOjNtZ+LnYTMRLQQ9nFcrefAkBdv8eActoX_b8A@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:34:21 -0700
+Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSz0xS_OJKx-Xvw9GWkeJXEOL5aFQ+2mC=y5RwKNRykRQ@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
+To: Kaz Wesley <keziahw@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1X7vC0-0002t6-Eh
+Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Squashing redundant tx data in blocks on
+ the wire
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:34:30 -0000
+
+On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Kaz Wesley <keziahw@gmail.com> wrote:
+> A node should be able to forget invs it has seen without invalidating wha=
+t
+> peers
+> know about its known txes. To allow for this, a node assembles a bloom
+> filter of
+
+Another option would be to just guarantee to keep at least the last N
+sent in each direction to bound memory usage. N could be negotiated.
+
+Going more complex than that may not have wins enough to justify it...
+would be good to measure it.
+
+
+(If you're not aware of it, check out=E2=80=94
+https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Gmaxwell/block_network_coding for a
+more complex idea)
+
+