summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com>2015-10-02 13:46:30 +0300
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-10-02 10:46:31 +0000
commit663b7a5af42ab2dad027c7c70a3b882b73883aa7 (patch)
tree2442880848ba1fd4d2a4532ae58c6a51bbbe163e
parentb20330e6a1bde3ed94fec506ee475c84b279cf73 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-663b7a5af42ab2dad027c7c70a3b882b73883aa7.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-663b7a5af42ab2dad027c7c70a3b882b73883aa7.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dev-list's stance on potentially altering the PoW algorithm
-rw-r--r--73/b15435795b08989982e1a8f2de1a176f8fdc3467
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/73/b15435795b08989982e1a8f2de1a176f8fdc34 b/73/b15435795b08989982e1a8f2de1a176f8fdc34
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e5a7ff849
--- /dev/null
+++ b/73/b15435795b08989982e1a8f2de1a176f8fdc34
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+Return-Path: <nxtchg@hush.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612A619BD
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:31 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1918231
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:31 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C3D6DC0214
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.com;
+ h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush;
+ bh=eQE7mUBjvkr/SlTFQl36+sJ0il56Kc8Uk/msD9e8VKc=;
+ b=gARqng2rf2vWd1jMoIpjjf9q24PqoDjQtpcHEz9bKaFpIgBCklOu60GaNWRg+2uCYRxXjB7LtfmnsugV2g96Isv7zq+WyrPKZEL53apg0A6MMMQjki/5d0141b2jb8+XVrGwGJ831wbcDi5OKICstDrpITwczfZIeSITUWXq5fE3vVlY3AiBGlNq9L4Bg54n0mn60yrPNw7FAmJP4VPzU2gB0IGE9CjgDb6yczbMk2ZeQs3jznywWnHXzEgAXcl18xdvE71UHvsgcUkgZja0a7EzQ8OCXvzvfo6Ud986cZsy5o/d1X6duVUE90Vd/jKQyyJfXX7V0az7YmRP8vuYWg==
+Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.83])
+ by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
+ Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99)
+ id 5F7A720101; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:46:30 +0300
+To: "=?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?=" <jtimon@jtimon.cc>,
+ "Daniele Pinna" <daniele.pinna@gmail.com>
+From: "NxtChg" <nxtchg@hush.com>
+In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDrOt2m6xfYjtVJne6Cm2nawXtA2-a4y7kaEA1fEgkUUUA@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CAEgR2PFQtr78B3t147=3Ko4VnTGevb0QCySk=hDSqeFHZk=MPQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABm2gDrOt2m6xfYjtVJne6Cm2nawXtA2-a4y7kaEA1fEgkUUUA@mail.gmail.com>
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
+Message-Id: <20151002104630.5F7A720101@smtp.hushmail.com>
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev]
+ =?utf-8?q?Dev-list=27s_stance_on_potentially_alteri?=
+ =?utf-8?q?ng_the_PoW=09algorithm?=
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:46:31 -0000
+
+
+>...obviously not for so called "ASIC-resistance" [an absurd term coined to promote some altcoins]
+
+Yet another fallacy of "all-or-nothing" thinking, which is so abundant in the Core camp.
+
+The fact that you can build ASIC for any kind of algorithm _in_theory_ doesn't mean you can't make it _arbitrary_hard_ in practice.
+
+So I would tone down the arrogance a bit.
+
+