diff options
author | NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com> | 2015-10-02 13:46:30 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-10-02 10:46:31 +0000 |
commit | 663b7a5af42ab2dad027c7c70a3b882b73883aa7 (patch) | |
tree | 2442880848ba1fd4d2a4532ae58c6a51bbbe163e | |
parent | b20330e6a1bde3ed94fec506ee475c84b279cf73 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-663b7a5af42ab2dad027c7c70a3b882b73883aa7.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-663b7a5af42ab2dad027c7c70a3b882b73883aa7.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dev-list's stance on potentially altering the PoW algorithm
-rw-r--r-- | 73/b15435795b08989982e1a8f2de1a176f8fdc34 | 67 |
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/73/b15435795b08989982e1a8f2de1a176f8fdc34 b/73/b15435795b08989982e1a8f2de1a176f8fdc34 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e5a7ff849 --- /dev/null +++ b/73/b15435795b08989982e1a8f2de1a176f8fdc34 @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +Return-Path: <nxtchg@hush.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612A619BD + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:31 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1918231 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:31 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C3D6DC0214 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:30 +0000 (UTC) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.com; + h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; + bh=eQE7mUBjvkr/SlTFQl36+sJ0il56Kc8Uk/msD9e8VKc=; + b=gARqng2rf2vWd1jMoIpjjf9q24PqoDjQtpcHEz9bKaFpIgBCklOu60GaNWRg+2uCYRxXjB7LtfmnsugV2g96Isv7zq+WyrPKZEL53apg0A6MMMQjki/5d0141b2jb8+XVrGwGJ831wbcDi5OKICstDrpITwczfZIeSITUWXq5fE3vVlY3AiBGlNq9L4Bg54n0mn60yrPNw7FAmJP4VPzU2gB0IGE9CjgDb6yczbMk2ZeQs3jznywWnHXzEgAXcl18xdvE71UHvsgcUkgZja0a7EzQ8OCXvzvfo6Ud986cZsy5o/d1X6duVUE90Vd/jKQyyJfXX7V0az7YmRP8vuYWg== +Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.83]) + by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; + Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:30 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) + id 5F7A720101; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:46:30 +0000 (UTC) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:46:30 +0300 +To: "=?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?=" <jtimon@jtimon.cc>, + "Daniele Pinna" <daniele.pinna@gmail.com> +From: "NxtChg" <nxtchg@hush.com> +In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDrOt2m6xfYjtVJne6Cm2nawXtA2-a4y7kaEA1fEgkUUUA@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAEgR2PFQtr78B3t147=3Ko4VnTGevb0QCySk=hDSqeFHZk=MPQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDrOt2m6xfYjtVJne6Cm2nawXtA2-a4y7kaEA1fEgkUUUA@mail.gmail.com> +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" +Message-Id: <20151002104630.5F7A720101@smtp.hushmail.com> +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] + =?utf-8?q?Dev-list=27s_stance_on_potentially_alteri?= + =?utf-8?q?ng_the_PoW=09algorithm?= +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:46:31 -0000 + + +>...obviously not for so called "ASIC-resistance" [an absurd term coined to promote some altcoins] + +Yet another fallacy of "all-or-nothing" thinking, which is so abundant in the Core camp. + +The fact that you can build ASIC for any kind of algorithm _in_theory_ doesn't mean you can't make it _arbitrary_hard_ in practice. + +So I would tone down the arrogance a bit. + + |