diff options
| author | ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com> | 2019-04-15 02:59:44 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2019-04-15 02:59:55 +0000 |
| commit | 65f0edf3d3995e358f53ba7902c0152b3da78adb (patch) | |
| tree | 2e662afe8def875ef0dae2b6d4bb47b8ef38c45d | |
| parent | 46b40a97b23bb7e063e9f87a2d1bdead7f3b88cd (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-65f0edf3d3995e358f53ba7902c0152b3da78adb.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-65f0edf3d3995e358f53ba7902c0152b3da78adb.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] List of proposals for hard fork/soft fork
| -rw-r--r-- | b7/5849409f7de3a48faa8dbc16cebcdaa21e1cda | 103 |
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b7/5849409f7de3a48faa8dbc16cebcdaa21e1cda b/b7/5849409f7de3a48faa8dbc16cebcdaa21e1cda new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f75ddf6c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/b7/5849409f7de3a48faa8dbc16cebcdaa21e1cda @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38D0415 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:55 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch (mail-40133.protonmail.ch + [185.70.40.133]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BC3C1C0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:54 +0000 (UTC) +Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:44 +0000 +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; + s=default; t=1555297192; + bh=xroD9VpCIC36ccElmT4/dpQ+MhlY+XAOo4CHYhUgRWI=; + h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID: + From; + b=aLmosgkt5zI23BUunluA2eJtL7Cf57mDYshTHhdL+G8nyhyNJhOq8U75PEGgQE4h6 + 8LVDxH9wSMGeTCBnOucSEsgSB63lzqf7bBW9f9C25/jXTw2Z37ru01IqpMIJ8HAFH1 + 3soF67t2BGef7S4AzU/HE7PLkZ7F1TBRlVcHnE5Q= +To: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <willtech@live.com.au>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com> +Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com> +Message-ID: <uwXr_PVDhAxPgfWwqANXIj4h0dyTW8ID4H9SMr1Aw6hYGfiB722bIcmhsZtyKMkdDUN9TzJUtcFxQ_mTvbjsqDKOIX4UtkBpl_4q_EpS1Cg=@protonmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <PS2P216MB01792E6227170E85F95A2BB49D2A0@PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> +References: <PS2P216MB01792E6227170E85F95A2BB49D2A0@PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> +Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 03:06:48 +0000 +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] List of proposals for hard fork/soft fork +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:55 -0000 + +Good morning LORD YOUR EXCELLENCY, + +May it please you to be informed the below are likely to be included in som= +e kind of upcoming softfork for SegWit v1: + +1. Schnorr signatures. +2. MuSig. +3. Taproot. +4. `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`. +5. Signature aggregation. May it please you to be informed, that "Schnorr= +" enables signature aggregation, but is not signature aggregation itself. +6. MAST. + +The above may or may not be an exhaustive list, your excellency. + +Of these, I believe only `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` has a BIP, may it please your ex= +cellency to learn that it is BIP 118. +However, I am sorry to inform your excellency, as I understand the `SIGHASH= +_NOINPUT` that will eventually reach Bitcoin Core will not match the curren= +t version of BIP118. +To improve on the possibility of incorrect use of `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`, it is = +proposed that every input that is signed with a `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` signature= + additionally require a signature without `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`. +For other details, I am sorry to inform your excellency, I have no reliable= + knowledge. + +Regards, +ZmnSCPxj + + +Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. + +=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= +ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 +On Sunday, April 14, 2019 10:44 PM, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitc= +oin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> Is anybody keeping a list of the solid proposals > BIP's to be included i= +n any actual future consensus-driven fork? Perhaps pre-consensus voting of = +what to include in the fork packages? +> +> Surely not every or each proposal ever scouted is on for consideration. +> +> This may actually help to build momentum for useful and valuable implemen= +tations that may otherwise languish. +> +> Regards, +> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH + + + |