summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc>2017-05-31 03:22:44 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2017-05-31 01:22:46 +0000
commit5b219a0de232b56a7810cd1406a6f8fe3632ced7 (patch)
tree1201242248aea7b25d84696b1e76ab17abcc55dc
parentbe240c1695345750996ab659821588e67a3cbf1f (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-5b219a0de232b56a7810cd1406a6f8fe3632ced7.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-5b219a0de232b56a7810cd1406a6f8fe3632ced7.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hypothetical 2 MB hardfork to follow BIP148
-rw-r--r--44/bc2379a921f3da713318672d074938cc27995c87
1 files changed, 87 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/44/bc2379a921f3da713318672d074938cc27995c b/44/bc2379a921f3da713318672d074938cc27995c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ed9290ad0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44/bc2379a921f3da713318672d074938cc27995c
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A6B7905
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 31 May 2017 01:22:46 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-ua0-f181.google.com (mail-ua0-f181.google.com
+ [209.85.217.181])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBCA12A
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 31 May 2017 01:22:45 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-ua0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u10so1348178uaf.1
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 30 May 2017 18:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
+ :cc; bh=Bged53+af4v1WgXbQ+OY3MlsdQRHcnH8ISNW4hugBgE=;
+ b=Doy9JXd+2D6Abb0FpZiQ6mODN5YyYuHcVuxMaE3wByCB19FOr4OmsnLXed2Mr6NEV2
+ s4foB1L3Uo/lX8LBDAAiLK3Lx7WerS4kiUCEmiD5PUll+RvNjtzLiEPaT16L0ZS8ORqm
+ RwAmK0LiFrqRaFRYLNFyatOJAeC6om4ATHGVzSt9Ll8IgRVswbAi6fvT+Aw72jIpuRqR
+ 0Ot1e1WpSsxARQRsHp9wow6vK6WCM40L2mNr+N3QKfmCWd5iiP14jTnHHvvudaeiFmXJ
+ a0W5S/yf38eYcjfXH5mRmlCLljsoJLdaQ6VUKWhSws8wj3qAw6qDDbRnO4Pf863if8ws
+ 5ajg==
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
+ :message-id:subject:to:cc;
+ bh=Bged53+af4v1WgXbQ+OY3MlsdQRHcnH8ISNW4hugBgE=;
+ b=CrlTNhkFrTUc1p1iRJoGpNylKXR6kXpJo0Nqbyo7YhEomPuZHUa+G7jl5xY5ggIyiH
+ O70jLE7quv/ADkGjnRbbLqpcT+dzLv7wLvRgB72/YmmSYYX5vhDynKrvJO3+h4hcvchP
+ lbz7sawERJIlrjPY/87hXcE9D5gK9/+Nk9HIlYdWnWN/BK8xCK88Ny+vc/5k55ofuu9q
+ woZrikK5ptdLXmdDHK3IoI8nCva1MOsWFfGjM2RxNjIzTkCZ8/ZNlzPBV5btrjx/X293
+ xkmc18+JfArDgmx98pAwu+d9veD6+K0rz8qjf3Y9btEt0lRCe+V9do3hMYFNo9lV9zEp
+ bTZA==
+X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCAf1doJasHlBJ4raQrbhMnGJLmMrPhuNBDsIju5RFJsO2b0B3+
+ OXxPY8WVtZpBeHe9YxtDYxnAqhQ4U5Ua
+X-Received: by 10.176.1.196 with SMTP id 62mr12615048ual.77.1496193765052;
+ Tue, 30 May 2017 18:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.31.52.213 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAH+Axy5yYQywpy0s9pBZt_fNoLPpWfra-cU9HrUwH71GDOchsQ@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <201705232023.40588.luke@dashjr.org>
+ <CAJowKgJK9zBkVAM1NyOsjU04gvwV3zGnk+1ebfpt6rnbiKy6Og@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABm2gDpet31gEcBY6NTxEG+xA4rvg8_c79L+J=mJySGbf7Ydbg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAOG=w-uei5-c-Mpp_R6RrN29NTrSV+gpNd79FC3cB6QPG65sEw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAH+Axy5yYQywpy0s9pBZt_fNoLPpWfra-cU9HrUwH71GDOchsQ@mail.gmail.com>
+From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
+Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 03:22:44 +0200
+Message-ID: <CABm2gDoJ7S3pjdjdbKZ4-EuVXnEOj-gEPzSEvUGdtYovZaNK=g@mail.gmail.com>
+To: James MacWhyte <macwhyte@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
+ RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hypothetical 2 MB hardfork to follow BIP148
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 01:22:46 -0000
+
+On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:50 AM, James MacWhyte <macwhyte@gmail.com> wrote:
+>
+>>
+>> The 1MB classic block size prevents quadratic hashing
+>> problems from being any worse than they are today.
+>>
+>
+> Add a transaction-size limit of, say, 10kb and the quadratic hashing problem
+> is a non-issue. Donezo.
+
+Why is it https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1661
+not enough at this point?
+Why the need for a transaction size limit?
+