summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAmir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>2012-05-02 12:25:30 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2012-05-02 19:25:37 +0000
commit53f99e3157d879c11221897f2df03ae52a53cabb (patch)
treeed63644a9ac362140a911bd87183a46f3ca1e8d3
parent71c2800d554d664eb0d40163933946b97c2cee70 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-53f99e3157d879c11221897f2df03ae52a53cabb.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-53f99e3157d879c11221897f2df03ae52a53cabb.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
-rw-r--r--04/13dd31b80f00ea592415fcdd1b7895eebdce5b126
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/04/13dd31b80f00ea592415fcdd1b7895eebdce5b b/04/13dd31b80f00ea592415fcdd1b7895eebdce5b
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9d02af10e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/04/13dd31b80f00ea592415fcdd1b7895eebdce5b
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1SPfBB-0005hr-PM
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 02 May 2012 19:25:37 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from nm39-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.229.165])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
+ id 1SPfBA-0005HX-Ni for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 02 May 2012 19:25:37 +0000
+Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm39.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 02 May 2012 19:25:31 -0000
+Received: from [98.138.89.166] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 02 May 2012 19:25:31 -0000
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1022.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 02 May 2012 19:25:31 -0000
+X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
+X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 59425.91050.bm@omp1022.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
+Received: (qmail 46451 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2012 19:25:30 -0000
+X-YMail-OSG: 4OiUN1UVM1klj_.D4tEpj3T1tdyFupELc9H6569YTQVLhF.
+ u6Rn6N_4PMptgciWuD21zp.CaW9zzc6LmUP4V9yw5MsmNyzqSnWDGkXVwXeZ
+ Hyvl6EUl1B4CuUlF7NgSa0I08XrXDnzbiCgKvQkZJ7tb73YINhiuN2uxtY7_
+ 27JyXcskliYB5qufd7aUwL3F8zkd_O5WjbGALMoAw3_E_QFwCbuM5G81Mj.c
+ Qe139LeVDcuOHgRZDJ6W_RhkFq58fmQaJ9QBMXL8.Pk79l9xHzRXy.i7P6CI
+ Mw9zpYQM.fUj6LCX_KfwnEmF0Jy9f.zxifsfhyYU1l0H5GRSebqKwCLwCr.E
+ Osg9srfVyPbcE.V_4.xhjXaC_M.DOuxutpndTj_qGao.rK_71YDb_KAARTyY
+ EW.sF9orCqQi4N38216DKyPruvp5nxpu8CFnKBrwJcd5gBBaQzLZnR9IBWYd
+ j31qrUWeTqwb9UfTyIhRZCSpYGlY0_Lgshsl4R3jjFIRNZMj3V__P9s9SGT0
+ 9bzDEL.yTkFXsW5TyT46iVTcFi0vHzX8B.jexj7V7X8PstnlzGd6OoAWXW1F
+ 0YoOyArHyNtmFXpThhwzd.mFv2YRJZWdPc4k_efYUIm2ut0dj7KNfqvstphR
+ O_qsOFSOJ
+Received: from [92.20.156.68] by web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
+ Wed, 02 May 2012 12:25:30 PDT
+X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524
+References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+ <201205020931.01718.luke@dashjr.org>
+ <CAD2Ti2_AUG7zmhwrg1GK9iDOgAh5RNrSEGvJefWCc0Uo=-GQbw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <201205021230.46349.luke@dashjr.org>
+ <CAD2Ti29NGc7F1_w5VgKm565CXwhrFPZvMx4BgE_5PVbh0SYU5w@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CA+8xBpczLTCzikGr62K-4paxecOTtcxFPygQsp7JRg_0DwvMEQ@mail.gmail.com>
+Message-ID: <1335986730.68336.YahooMailNeo@web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
+From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
+To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
+ <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpczLTCzikGr62K-4paxecOTtcxFPygQsp7JRg_0DwvMEQ@mail.gmail.com>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
+ no trust [98.138.229.165 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
+ -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1SPfBA-0005HX-Ni
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 19:25:37 -0000
+
+This is like the most annoying thing about email. Often with group emails, we'll be having a conversation then someone will click reply instead of group reply and the convo will go on for a while. Eventually I'll realise the persons are missing and add them back in.
+
+On Yahoo mail (which I use for spam/mailing lists), to do reply all involves clicking a tab, scrolling down and clicking Reply All. Normally I instead go through the steps of reply, delete To, re-enter bitco... select drop down, click send.
+
+Anyone know how to make reply all the default in mutt? And how can I exclude it from re-including my own email when I do a group reply so I don't get the same email again.
+
+
+
+----- Original Message -----
+From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
+To: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
+Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
+
+On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
+>> Try "Reply to All"
+>
+> That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
+> which dupes to the sender and eventually
+> blows out the to and cc lines as everyone
+> chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves
+> most of that. assuming the list sw can do it.
+
+"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful
+http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
+
+
+
+--
+Jeff Garzik
+exMULTI, Inc.
+jgarzik@exmulti.com
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Live Security Virtual Conference
+Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
+threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
+will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
+threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
+_______________________________________________
+Bitcoin-development mailing list
+Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
+
+
+