diff options
author | Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> | 2012-05-02 12:25:30 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2012-05-02 19:25:37 +0000 |
commit | 53f99e3157d879c11221897f2df03ae52a53cabb (patch) | |
tree | ed63644a9ac362140a911bd87183a46f3ca1e8d3 | |
parent | 71c2800d554d664eb0d40163933946b97c2cee70 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-53f99e3157d879c11221897f2df03ae52a53cabb.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-53f99e3157d879c11221897f2df03ae52a53cabb.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
-rw-r--r-- | 04/13dd31b80f00ea592415fcdd1b7895eebdce5b | 126 |
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/04/13dd31b80f00ea592415fcdd1b7895eebdce5b b/04/13dd31b80f00ea592415fcdd1b7895eebdce5b new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9d02af10e --- /dev/null +++ b/04/13dd31b80f00ea592415fcdd1b7895eebdce5b @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1SPfBB-0005hr-PM + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Wed, 02 May 2012 19:25:37 +0000 +X-ACL-Warn: +Received: from nm39-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.229.165]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76) + id 1SPfBA-0005HX-Ni for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Wed, 02 May 2012 19:25:37 +0000 +Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm39.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; + 02 May 2012 19:25:31 -0000 +Received: from [98.138.89.166] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; + 02 May 2012 19:25:31 -0000 +Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1022.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; + 02 May 2012 19:25:31 -0000 +X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 +X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 59425.91050.bm@omp1022.mail.ne1.yahoo.com +Received: (qmail 46451 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2012 19:25:30 -0000 +X-YMail-OSG: 4OiUN1UVM1klj_.D4tEpj3T1tdyFupELc9H6569YTQVLhF. + u6Rn6N_4PMptgciWuD21zp.CaW9zzc6LmUP4V9yw5MsmNyzqSnWDGkXVwXeZ + Hyvl6EUl1B4CuUlF7NgSa0I08XrXDnzbiCgKvQkZJ7tb73YINhiuN2uxtY7_ + 27JyXcskliYB5qufd7aUwL3F8zkd_O5WjbGALMoAw3_E_QFwCbuM5G81Mj.c + Qe139LeVDcuOHgRZDJ6W_RhkFq58fmQaJ9QBMXL8.Pk79l9xHzRXy.i7P6CI + Mw9zpYQM.fUj6LCX_KfwnEmF0Jy9f.zxifsfhyYU1l0H5GRSebqKwCLwCr.E + Osg9srfVyPbcE.V_4.xhjXaC_M.DOuxutpndTj_qGao.rK_71YDb_KAARTyY + EW.sF9orCqQi4N38216DKyPruvp5nxpu8CFnKBrwJcd5gBBaQzLZnR9IBWYd + j31qrUWeTqwb9UfTyIhRZCSpYGlY0_Lgshsl4R3jjFIRNZMj3V__P9s9SGT0 + 9bzDEL.yTkFXsW5TyT46iVTcFi0vHzX8B.jexj7V7X8PstnlzGd6OoAWXW1F + 0YoOyArHyNtmFXpThhwzd.mFv2YRJZWdPc4k_efYUIm2ut0dj7KNfqvstphR + O_qsOFSOJ +Received: from [92.20.156.68] by web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; + Wed, 02 May 2012 12:25:30 PDT +X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524 +References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> + <201205020931.01718.luke@dashjr.org> + <CAD2Ti2_AUG7zmhwrg1GK9iDOgAh5RNrSEGvJefWCc0Uo=-GQbw@mail.gmail.com> + <201205021230.46349.luke@dashjr.org> + <CAD2Ti29NGc7F1_w5VgKm565CXwhrFPZvMx4BgE_5PVbh0SYU5w@mail.gmail.com> + <CA+8xBpczLTCzikGr62K-4paxecOTtcxFPygQsp7JRg_0DwvMEQ@mail.gmail.com> +Message-ID: <1335986730.68336.YahooMailNeo@web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> +Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:25:30 -0700 (PDT) +From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> +To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" + <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpczLTCzikGr62K-4paxecOTtcxFPygQsp7JRg_0DwvMEQ@mail.gmail.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + no trust [98.138.229.165 listed in list.dnswl.org] + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (zgenjix[at]yahoo.com) + -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + domain + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1SPfBA-0005HX-Ni +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 19:25:37 -0000 + +This is like the most annoying thing about email. Often with group emails, we'll be having a conversation then someone will click reply instead of group reply and the convo will go on for a while. Eventually I'll realise the persons are missing and add them back in. + +On Yahoo mail (which I use for spam/mailing lists), to do reply all involves clicking a tab, scrolling down and clicking Reply All. Normally I instead go through the steps of reply, delete To, re-enter bitco... select drop down, click send. + +Anyone know how to make reply all the default in mutt? And how can I exclude it from re-including my own email when I do a group reply so I don't get the same email again. + + + +----- Original Message ----- +From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> +To: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page + +On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: +>> Try "Reply to All" +> +> That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc', +> which dupes to the sender and eventually +> blows out the to and cc lines as everyone +> chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves +> most of that. assuming the list sw can do it. + +"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful +http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html + + + +-- +Jeff Garzik +exMULTI, Inc. +jgarzik@exmulti.com + +------------------------------------------------------------------------------ +Live Security Virtual Conference +Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and +threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions +will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware +threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ +_______________________________________________ +Bitcoin-development mailing list +Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development + + + |