summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc>2015-08-21 22:09:33 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-08-21 20:09:36 +0000
commit4792d9ffe60065a75ac0e9c3ff13b261b9eabffe (patch)
treebae41206d1388dbf915cdaec438a24e6995c0cf6
parent351f76f76ce299db3397ae9c41e5df0aa1cd4f4d (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-4792d9ffe60065a75ac0e9c3ff13b261b9eabffe.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-4792d9ffe60065a75ac0e9c3ff13b261b9eabffe.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
-rw-r--r--44/3f772e2ea111d8dcae79a321e402d5f6c19e4c86
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/44/3f772e2ea111d8dcae79a321e402d5f6c19e4c b/44/3f772e2ea111d8dcae79a321e402d5f6c19e4c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4a63ac595
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44/3f772e2ea111d8dcae79a321e402d5f6c19e4c
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764D5847
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:09:36 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com (mail-lb0-f176.google.com
+ [209.85.217.176])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B86711E
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:09:35 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by lbbsx3 with SMTP id sx3so50258997lbb.0
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
+ :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
+ :content-transfer-encoding;
+ bh=CxKoKkG+lP9ZJ3fFbAkNT/ONOcGUxCOC3VLbYSLg1K0=;
+ b=I0l97ZGQX+pM8t2uofORGJyiUxdDEETARiwgy/VL32z2IEGYAa30FMbX17HKjfdqn0
+ dScGNVFR1sYiX26VIFpqi0BBpCEpJooZYKdocMsenXeXxv2GitOsAShVq41yJ7uIntaQ
+ CBNITGCOJCUXGQWFoCxFG4OIWcZy2RgxPulHbu4lXqlBwhR1eBTduhk1L3DjElFuljOb
+ S+Jp0spwg8a/5HFkve2p++APNSUaVdbQY9JIUdEZWtZvwGZBQLFfLflmK1byThyXWV+o
+ F/bd+Y27SC4+1Oe7Ye/Uq1OI2B+uQbD8/ZAuLgsLVpQce/6GX2N3ay13nuC3DZak4RnN
+ vUQw==
+X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSFbomAb2QA57JnyU8oMAvZWG8QGqS74fhaboOCkv6ytrrZqAeRKejLRi4yrFzC2Q60TMv
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.152.42.170 with SMTP id p10mr9138066lal.39.1440187773535;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.25.15.22 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAFkt3UOzL2eeYq9ntCDdp5so+5G=73W9v0kP98i+80J9DNWn_g@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CAED3CWgTOMFgaM6bBfU0Dn-R0NrdrhGAQo34wHEneYkTtB4Opg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAEieSeSw04FYCCa-Df+V6BgJo1RHqPvJWt9t=c-JCC=dnhraWA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABm2gDp0o5DBzuoyZ=SFvnBXTwPYFWhdOqUPkP_M_3koNMVP1g@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAFkt3UOzL2eeYq9ntCDdp5so+5G=73W9v0kP98i+80J9DNWn_g@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:09:33 +0200
+Message-ID: <CABm2gDqhRmJ-7e2SEEPGgr7OXwpb7pPUQq3tsXJx2K7nDftZag@mail.gmail.com>
+From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
+To: Sriram Karra <karra.etc@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:09:36 -0000
+
+On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Sriram Karra <karra.etc@gmail.com> wrote:
+> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n
+> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+>>
+>>
+>> For the 73th time or so this month on this list:
+>>
+>> The maximum block size consensus rule limits mining centralization
+>> (which is currently pretty bad).
+>>
+>> But don't worry about not being an authority on the subject: Gavin
+>> (who has written extensively on the subject) doesn't seem to
+>> understand this either.
+>
+>
+> If your goal is to get the Miners (who are highly centralised today) to
+> implement a change in consensus rule that will limit mining centralisatio=
+n,
+> guess what public position you will be taking?
+
+The rule is already there. My goal is to make sure we understand the
+potential consequences of changing that rule in the "less limitation
+to mining centralization" better before changing it.
+