summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>2011-07-04 18:30:12 -0400
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2011-07-04 22:30:18 +0000
commit46af8abf628b8593e2f5c67de19a011a99fa4c65 (patch)
treeb59b47f88d4ef7cb3ac5f9ed5d9ee2c1b176df11
parent29b30c63ed684fcd47a22089715dad2737f45065 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-46af8abf628b8593e2f5c67de19a011a99fa4c65.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-46af8abf628b8593e2f5c67de19a011a99fa4c65.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Encrypted Wallet Backward Compatibility
-rw-r--r--60/8819f4893a81f961ce022b54d73cc6e9e71f1578
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/60/8819f4893a81f961ce022b54d73cc6e9e71f15 b/60/8819f4893a81f961ce022b54d73cc6e9e71f15
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9045a9d24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/60/8819f4893a81f961ce022b54d73cc6e9e71f15
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1Qdrek-0006wZ-QW
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.216.47; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-qw0-f47.google.com;
+Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47])
+ by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1Qdrej-0000FK-VW
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 +0000
+Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so3489775qwh.34
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.229.241.205 with SMTP id lf13mr848340qcb.292.1309818612460;
+ Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.229.83.196 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <5196CA67-B84A-4413-BE6D-504811EAA954@jrbobdobbs.org>
+References: <1309801974.3423.80.camel@Desktop666>
+ <CABsx9T31ZuQHKwcNnb9-NpaCA6c43PXVZ+Tc+GZ=2Wkz08enHw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <5196CA67-B84A-4413-BE6D-504811EAA954@jrbobdobbs.org>
+Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:30:12 -0400
+Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSNdnT+7qvBRnqMTG3Pnciw+U81GhgaTD9=-7bdpPyiFQ@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
+To: Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1Qdrej-0000FK-VW
+Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Encrypted Wallet Backward Compatibility
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 -0000
+
+On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org> wrote:
+>
+> On Jul 4, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
+>> RE: breaking backup scripts: =C2=A0if they use the backupwallet =C2=A0RP=
+C
+>> command, then they will Just Work.
+>
+> I'd go a step further and say that, since import/export is planned to get=
+ merged at about the same time, intentionally breaking unsafe/badly designe=
+d backup mechanisms is actually desirable.
+
+Silently breaking them, not so much.
+
+Or do you think people are going to notice that they've started
+backing up a zero byte file?
+
+