diff options
author | Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> | 2011-07-04 18:30:12 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2011-07-04 22:30:18 +0000 |
commit | 46af8abf628b8593e2f5c67de19a011a99fa4c65 (patch) | |
tree | b59b47f88d4ef7cb3ac5f9ed5d9ee2c1b176df11 | |
parent | 29b30c63ed684fcd47a22089715dad2737f45065 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-46af8abf628b8593e2f5c67de19a011a99fa4c65.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-46af8abf628b8593e2f5c67de19a011a99fa4c65.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Encrypted Wallet Backward Compatibility
-rw-r--r-- | 60/8819f4893a81f961ce022b54d73cc6e9e71f15 | 78 |
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/60/8819f4893a81f961ce022b54d73cc6e9e71f15 b/60/8819f4893a81f961ce022b54d73cc6e9e71f15 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9045a9d24 --- /dev/null +++ b/60/8819f4893a81f961ce022b54d73cc6e9e71f15 @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1Qdrek-0006wZ-QW + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.216.47; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; + helo=mail-qw0-f47.google.com; +Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]) + by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1Qdrej-0000FK-VW + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 +0000 +Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so3489775qwh.34 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.229.241.205 with SMTP id lf13mr848340qcb.292.1309818612460; + Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.229.83.196 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <5196CA67-B84A-4413-BE6D-504811EAA954@jrbobdobbs.org> +References: <1309801974.3423.80.camel@Desktop666> + <CABsx9T31ZuQHKwcNnb9-NpaCA6c43PXVZ+Tc+GZ=2Wkz08enHw@mail.gmail.com> + <5196CA67-B84A-4413-BE6D-504811EAA954@jrbobdobbs.org> +Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:30:12 -0400 +Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSNdnT+7qvBRnqMTG3Pnciw+U81GhgaTD9=-7bdpPyiFQ@mail.gmail.com> +From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> +To: Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1Qdrej-0000FK-VW +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Encrypted Wallet Backward Compatibility +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 -0000 + +On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org> wrote: +> +> On Jul 4, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: +>> RE: breaking backup scripts: =C2=A0if they use the backupwallet =C2=A0RP= +C +>> command, then they will Just Work. +> +> I'd go a step further and say that, since import/export is planned to get= + merged at about the same time, intentionally breaking unsafe/badly designe= +d backup mechanisms is actually desirable. + +Silently breaking them, not so much. + +Or do you think people are going to notice that they've started +backing up a zero byte file? + + |