summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOverthefalls <overthefalls@opengroupware.ch>2023-11-13 09:05:38 -0600
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2023-11-13 15:14:20 +0000
commit44834d31d44800fd776a30b68596f3fb049f1999 (patch)
treed53247cdf9601aad8214b02d7d6cdeff9a39f4f6
parent8307435e1a8298558b2c0957e88aa40cdd280beb (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-44834d31d44800fd776a30b68596f3fb049f1999.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-44834d31d44800fd776a30b68596f3fb049f1999.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Future of the bitcoin-dev mailing list
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--63/6313f791e4dc979a82b26857affcc7976cece3160
1 files changed, 160 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/63/6313f791e4dc979a82b26857affcc7976cece3 b/63/6313f791e4dc979a82b26857affcc7976cece3
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5dce847eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/63/6313f791e4dc979a82b26857affcc7976cece3
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+Return-Path: <overthefalls@opengroupware.ch>
+Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
+ by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7CBC0032
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:14:20 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24A240B22
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
+DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org F24A240B22
+Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org;
+ dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=opengroupware.ch header.i=@opengroupware.ch
+ header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim20160331 header.b=EY9FQrFV
+X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: 0.601
+X-Spam-Level:
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5
+ tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
+ DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
+ SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
+Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id knzkXlZs7cGS
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:14:15 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: delayed 507 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at util1.osuosl.org;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:14:14 UTC
+DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 75FB140B25
+Received: from mx.kolabnow.com (mx.kolabnow.com [212.103.80.155])
+ by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75FB140B25
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:14:14 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
+ by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F34302338A
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:05:45 +0100 (CET)
+Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com (amavis);
+ dkim=pass (4096-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)"
+ header.d=opengroupware.ch
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
+ opengroupware.ch; h=mime-version:date:date:content-type
+ :content-type:references:in-reply-to:from:from:subject:subject
+ :message-id:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t=
+ 1699887944; x=1701702345; bh=OLZrmiSrI/wpZNeLQfmf799+58ePPFrscYI
+ fykUD+gM=; b=EY9FQrFV0C5HkdgPb8Nri6ygQBDbscnEePodetTSwf/MmskNBBY
+ 1K6Wd0owsumuEv3Z+4W5pr3aqwue2k1TfhLIO3YLaIFNUHLo/+kYRA1ACE3fPY9z
+ 8/eHoh6SojilC+LWHvKjzKrOayh18RisvfCf1uoJy+JiDkCPKIGIMWzJWxJQBJy6
+ 53QbGBdXCY3IYF3x6NZ4xaRAmFuEFkbeKTsMWLTjfKTr6tWJyeKr+QhwZDuVxKpi
+ 7NoUrGMsnKP/d4Y+R8T/Nudm15k0Ll5ZifhlM11rf+XeroUcjx+XwD2b6+r+9B3E
+ Z6P0bndu0hn4LzS1zBAWW0TXjV6/vvhObb14S/6p1fsxSvksrwYYNymALRfTcMq8
+ A12oE4lR7lBt0NhG3u9RQg9R0KkmCIVzFyjQ+2UQ9+H7G+6FWCGpa4J2khZhekVZ
+ ZUH87PBylGNTLEw8hDMCjbJnzkP9rHuwAtNuL/cAf3+D3rbjE2W++1Q6csCDHywk
+ KRT/KCngiFTdho2LFZ/FCxVrDVGLKHsH6+mCL6eWnMpInWZO7PbGWWU0zLYiufAZ
+ ZIvYdSa+vqwc6rmA/ZAvdeHubaEljcTOX0pzbVwCczG/zApnrBLmMPMQ1udtyhmN
+ slERQPM5ypiFTXErWzGqY60+CLa60CSEzqHBzE1xnivfSKyoiQnFp/Zc=
+X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com
+Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id liXpDJ-8G6A0 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:05:44 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from int-mx009.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.9])
+ by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50690300D372
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:05:43 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from ext-subm010.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.10])
+ by int-mx009.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BDC20D8CE6
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:05:43 +0100 (CET)
+Message-ID: <8abf319929b0a729eab5ad4659727ff250e10efd.camel@opengroupware.ch>
+From: Overthefalls <overthefalls@opengroupware.ch>
+To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+In-Reply-To: <CABaSBaz9OTSVa1KNk0GOrH3T-kRF_7OPVu0AtpuaFGVB=zhdwQ@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CABaSBaz9OTSVa1KNk0GOrH3T-kRF_7OPVu0AtpuaFGVB=zhdwQ@mail.gmail.com>
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-i0M10ZTVARtpBzAJw+31"
+Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:05:38 -0600
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:40:54 +0000
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Future of the bitcoin-dev mailing list
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:14:20 -0000
+
+
+--=-i0M10ZTVARtpBzAJw+31
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+
+On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 09:37 -0600, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev wrote:
+Google Groups is another interesting option,
+
+I don't think I'm the only person on this list that is strongly opposed
+to using google for anything. They are too big and they have their hand
+in everything, and their eyes (and analytics) on everything.
+
+I remember when there were virtually no gmail email addresses that
+posted to this list. Suddenly in 2020 or 2021, we had an influx of
+gmail subscribers and posters. That didn't escape me then and it is not
+lost on me now.
+
+Email is great for public discussion for many reasons. The fact that
+everyone gets a copy of the data, there is no single central authority
+that can edit emails once they have been sent out. Anyone can archive
+email messages, they can generally store or publish the data anywhere
+they like. That is not the case with web forum content.
+
+I like the lightning anti-spam fee idea. That would encourage me to
+finally adopt lightning, and it would, I'm sure, produce some
+interesting results for the list.
+
+I don't think email should be out of the question. Does anyone besides
+kanzure@gmail.com think that sticking with email is out of the
+question?
+
+Let's do what's necessary to stick with email.
+
+
+
+
+
+--=-i0M10ZTVARtpBzAJw+31
+Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<html dir=3D"ltr"><head></head><body style=3D"text-align:left; direction:lt=
+r;"><div>On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 09:37 -0600, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev wr=
+ote:</div><blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left=
+:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex">Google Groups is another interesting o=
+ption, </blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't think I'm the only person o=
+n this list that is strongly opposed to using google for anything. They are=
+ too big and they have their hand in everything, and their eyes (and analyt=
+ics) on everything.</div><div><br></div><div>I remember when there were vir=
+tually no gmail email addresses that posted to this list. Suddenly in 2020 =
+or 2021, we had an influx of gmail subscribers and posters. That didn't esc=
+ape me then and it is not lost on me now. </div><div><br></div><div>Email i=
+s great for public discussion for many reasons. The fact that everyone gets=
+ a copy of the data, there is no single central authority that can edit ema=
+ils once they have been sent out. Anyone can archive email messages, they c=
+an generally store or publish the data anywhere they like. That is not the =
+case with web forum content. </div><div><br></div><div>I like the lightning=
+ anti-spam fee idea. That would encourage me to finally adopt lightning, an=
+d it would, I'm sure, produce some interesting results for the list. </div>=
+<div><br></div><div>I don't think email should be out of the question. Does=
+ anyone besides <a href=3D"mailto:kanzure@gmail.com">kanzure@gmail.com</a> =
+think that sticking with email is out of the question?</div><div><br></div>=
+<div>Let's do what's necessary to stick with email. </div><div><br></div><d=
+iv><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>
+
+--=-i0M10ZTVARtpBzAJw+31--
+
+
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-04-30 14:01:34 +0000