summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLuke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>2013-11-02 05:54:28 +0000
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2013-11-02 05:54:40 +0000
commit3f233a7be35122a01b1410a0f8cdb4d4e1fb09a9 (patch)
tree2e617a60581b0d9a5c83f189ef2c4cf505f5d44d
parentbedeab511de7278c74e3f3f53aa18f7f7d280d09 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-3f233a7be35122a01b1410a0f8cdb4d4e1fb09a9.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-3f233a7be35122a01b1410a0f8cdb4d4e1fb09a9.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Message Signing based authentication
-rw-r--r--6f/f8fa7f0c6125bc28788f657157adc865a65de473
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/6f/f8fa7f0c6125bc28788f657157adc865a65de4 b/6f/f8fa7f0c6125bc28788f657157adc865a65de4
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..47a305d0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/6f/f8fa7f0c6125bc28788f657157adc865a65de4
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1VcUAS-0008A4-KQ
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Sat, 02 Nov 2013 05:54:40 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([192.3.11.21])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ id 1VcUAR-0005eK-Jg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Sat, 02 Nov 2013 05:54:40 +0000
+Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
+ [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:222:4dff:fe50:4c49])
+ (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
+ by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCCE11083790
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:54:38 +0000 (UTC)
+From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
+To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:54:28 +0000
+User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.15-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; )
+References: <20131102050144.5850@gmx.com>
+In-Reply-To: <20131102050144.5850@gmx.com>
+X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
+X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
+X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: Text/Plain;
+ charset="iso-8859-15"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Message-Id: <201311020554.31403.luke@dashjr.org>
+X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+ 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
+ See
+ http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
+ for more information. [URIs: bitcoingrant.org]
+X-Headers-End: 1VcUAR-0005eK-Jg
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Message Signing based authentication
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 05:54:40 -0000
+
+On Saturday, November 02, 2013 5:01:43 AM bitcoingrant@gmx.com wrote:
+> In celebration of the 5 year anniversary of the Bitcoin whitepaper, we are
+> delighted to introduce the Message Signing based authentication method. In
+> brief, the authentication work as follows:
+> Server provides a token for the client to sign.
+> client passes the signed message and the bitcoin address back to the
+> server. server validates the message and honors the alias (optional) and
+> bitcoin address as identification. http://forums.bitcoingrant.org/
+> Above is a proof of concept forum that utilize this authentication method.
+
+Congratulations! You've reinvented what Eligius and Bitcoin-OTC have been
+doing for years! :)
+
+There's no reason to ask the user to provide the address every time, though...
+
+Luke
+
+