diff options
| author | Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> | 2015-12-19 10:20:38 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-12-19 18:20:46 +0000 |
| commit | 3de28f746192eec77af355abdbd65ec7dae8459c (patch) | |
| tree | 1040a3ba6a08b159d43037b7e7a98f9668bf8a0a | |
| parent | b8e73426a1591c10fbf023c7f657be957e2d43da (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-3de28f746192eec77af355abdbd65ec7dae8459c.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-3de28f746192eec77af355abdbd65ec7dae8459c.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] The increase of max block size should be determined by block height instead of block time
| -rw-r--r-- | 2b/da7da3c5f5b28a9686a3f62be321b6b14671c0 | 110 |
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2b/da7da3c5f5b28a9686a3f62be321b6b14671c0 b/2b/da7da3c5f5b28a9686a3f62be321b6b14671c0 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0fc2af536 --- /dev/null +++ b/2b/da7da3c5f5b28a9686a3f62be321b6b14671c0 @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C22CEDC + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:20:46 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from outmail148109.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail148109.authsmtp.co.uk + [62.13.148.109]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98E5ED + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:20:45 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232]) + by punt23.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tBJIKiaI058148; + Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:20:44 GMT +Received: from muck (S0106e091f5827ad2.ok.shawcable.net [24.71.232.17]) + (authenticated bits=128) + by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tBJIKdAq046791 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); + Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:20:42 GMT +Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:20:38 -0800 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com> +Message-ID: <20151219182038.GA12893@muck> +References: <CAFzgq-xNZmWrdwCDv3twdsqSWk-FyMuLYJjZ_bA42_5Po0mgEg@mail.gmail.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <CAFzgq-xNZmWrdwCDv3twdsqSWk-FyMuLYJjZ_bA42_5Po0mgEg@mail.gmail.com> +X-Server-Quench: 3703f652-a67d-11e5-829e-00151795d556 +X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: + http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse +X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR + aAdMdwsUHFAXAgsB AmMbWlxeUl17XWE7 aQ5PagRDYElMQQRt + T01BRU1TWkEae2V6 Um9fUh10cAxHNnp4 bE4sXXdbXxJ8cERg + E0hTQXAHZDJldWgd WRVFdwNVdQJNdxoR b1V5GhFYa3VsNCMk + FAgyOXU9MCtqYBhV T0kMK1kITE8QE3Y7 SVgHFCVnF0kCTCZ7 + NB00JxYHHEEMNkl6 O1ZDEV4VLxIIDwxY Ek0FCj4RLV0GTClj + DQ5bUk4CWDxbWjtR CxFgJREACDhVUSkQ GEpARnkA +X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706 +X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) +X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.71.232.17/587 +X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own + anti-virus system. +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The increase of max block size should be + determined by block height instead of block time +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:20:46 -0000 + + +--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 03:17:03AM +0800, Chun Wang via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> In many BIPs we have seen, include the latest BIP202, it is the block +> time that determine the max block size. From from pool's point of +> view, it cannot issue a job with a fixed ntime due to the existence of +> ntime roll. It is hard to issue a job with the max block size unknown. +> For developers, it is also easier to implement if max block size is a +> function of block height instead of time. Block height is also much +> more simple and elegant than time. + +If size is calculated from the median time past, which is fixed for a +given block and has no dependency on the block header's nTime field, +does that solve your problem? + +By "median time past" I mean the median time for the previous block. + +--=20 +'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org +00000000000000000188b6321da7feae60d74c7b0becbdab3b1a0bd57f10947d + +--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQGrBAEBCACVBQJWdZ/zXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw +MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMTg4YjYzMjFkYTdmZWFlNjBkNzRjN2IwYmVjYmRhYjNi +MWEwYmQ1N2YxMDk0N2QvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 +ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udwnZQf9HB0CzydgHXpytcheavW+c3oo +H2uouvfJP3V026G6PvHXmxJ/cbe/EFrTfL6D3BvdxH7bgYgWLJUBldVE+Wgx8MjB +YAT8MIRAEhUCbpz7pcEk8oIZgG9Mxirnn/N+SdI2o/jOYLBzkvfBuP/+Y3a60n7t +YIlc9IHq3+w7uV6RMw0EeWaWNjbFPfxtdoiIRYnePrQ1Q9eCdK+LdFblRPUVJxOT +NM/X7VApQeOYoYRInDDcuio6CVAD3+rJ7/pDxqKRBs9qWgp3+gYcKi2+rTCm+JA4 +MuYow3Oy9GsSxpVGk2SQ2kPB/6cnIAjOflEU5fu+94M5XeN0xrxxV/Y5TShang== +=XpBe +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j-- + |