diff options
| author | Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> | 2012-07-31 16:26:21 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2012-07-31 14:26:31 +0000 |
| commit | 3cada8f4d5926d7f545e20c1770b9e223d37e848 (patch) | |
| tree | a6f75801722118915d0b63de7d636bf8315e2708 | |
| parent | 8d3c0f8d6fa91eac1fbd8d9146b0214c332f998e (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-3cada8f4d5926d7f545e20c1770b9e223d37e848.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-3cada8f4d5926d7f545e20c1770b9e223d37e848.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] script tests - invalid script in script_valid.json?
| -rw-r--r-- | 7f/34ae10b95dc73cd77a932065246ccb4faad3f8 | 80 |
1 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/7f/34ae10b95dc73cd77a932065246ccb4faad3f8 b/7f/34ae10b95dc73cd77a932065246ccb4faad3f8 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5bec1f002 --- /dev/null +++ b/7f/34ae10b95dc73cd77a932065246ccb4faad3f8 @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>) id 1SwDP5-0006MB-24 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:26:31 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.214.175; envelope-from=pieter.wuille@gmail.com; + helo=mail-ob0-f175.google.com; +Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1SwDP1-0004gE-Dy + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:26:31 +0000 +Received: by obcva7 with SMTP id va7so11105103obc.34 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.182.192.41 with SMTP id hd9mr23767700obc.17.1343744781870; + Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.76.9.129 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T016OmU2qU1a67=YmpA4VDbzrddOamc8=Mt6x7BhVO1Uw@mail.gmail.com> +References: <1343579466.30862.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> + <501565D5.4060608@justmoon.de> + <1343580154.34128.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> + <50157450.8070806@justmoon.de> + <CABsx9T016OmU2qU1a67=YmpA4VDbzrddOamc8=Mt6x7BhVO1Uw@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:26:21 +0200 +Message-ID: <CAPg+sBhMaX2=t1peYRUWk4DCyMFxihPUV2+e+4p8zVLcCci-kQ@mail.gmail.com> +From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> +To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature + 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list +X-Headers-End: 1SwDP1-0004gE-Dy +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] script tests - invalid script in + script_valid.json? +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:26:31 -0000 + +On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> wrote: +> check*sig tests are tricky, because they have to refer to previous +> unspent transactions and private keys (so require a particular block +> chain to test against). Brilliant ideas on a simple data-driven format +> welcome. + +Ultraprune changes the block validation mechanism to only use a set of +coins and the latest block pointer as state. This state is represented +by an abstract class with several implementations. It would be easy to +have a testset run with a memory-backed coin set as state, with the +list of coins and blocks loaded from a file. + +-- +Pieter + + |