+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]

+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)

+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)

+ (envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1Wce79-00047K-EI

+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;

+ Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:04:11 +0000

+Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53])

+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)

+ (Exim 4.76) id 1Wce76-00024E-6d

+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;

+ Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:04:11 +0000

+Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id ld10so5142708pab.40

+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;

+ Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:04:02 -0700 (PDT)

+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;

+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;

+ h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent

+ :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type

+ :content-transfer-encoding;

+ bh=oicVStzmZ6nhK4sz7qJkENn0WPDCgf2YA/mLCt70/Kk=;

+ b=VYGlFnJ7OV/U0f1Cmu2yf1mmXF6ljfC/BWcoayis6MdnkJUC1/3nPXk52U/SQCetvn

+ bCqHPpTW56bDEHJzEvWW+L1Y1BU8M9S5aXh352N1TrWAtjgBW0irRHwGAP1R5XuS88da

+ wnAghgdVzFvs6yX+HPAoUnkhzanHAI/4dxOTB7vzONVfuiu2rYqVGMwwYNQ6KD1pgcXq

+ I6twbF7M9ZLHfDJFGy9lDPa8HWs1luwg+fU2X4chmA9DUCL4xcJaTGYT6p8EMEs2ZAE3

+ TQLfZqa6PbnrMQGYDcO2XulFBTlhLKhUpIzLG6kTCVnEFkslasV1AVM9RL0XzWWzgX7G

+ iQ7A==

+X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlCJju/JGbSZaDFE2RToc/8zAWdGCBuOzmLcLgkY1RUEVclkaU+ETB9prlnhbjnjrcYaEx6

+X-Received: by 10.67.1.106 with SMTP id bf10mr45083761pad.78.1398186241986;

+ Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:04:01 -0700 (PDT)

+Received: from [192.168.127.194] (50-0-36-93.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net.

+ [50.0.36.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id

+ vd8sm204606744pac.12.2014.04.22.10.04.00 for <multiple recipients>

+ (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);

+ Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:04:01 -0700 (PDT)

+Message-ID: <5356A0FF.3010109@monetize.io>

+Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:03:59 -0700

+From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>

+Organization: Monetize.io Inc.

+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;

+ rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0

+MIME-Version: 1.0

+To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>

+References: <CAC7yFxSE8-TWPN-kuFiqdPKMDuprbiVJi7-z-ym+AUyA_f-xJw@mail.gmail.com> <CABh=4qNaJht-MnnjEguZ=UOuXN3uQ-s4-dkDUVErbHj6W44J_g@mail.gmail.com> <1927948.OEZHQcsQ9n@crushinator>

+ <2025496.b5Y3n7qx8B@crushinator>

+ <1582E990-4E14-4EF7-9C9C-AA505B815104@bitsofproof.com>

+ <53568B87.8040009@monetize.io>

+ <11528A13-5D66-4D2B-BEE0-1C26F9987BC8@bitsofproof.com>

+In-Reply-To: <11528A13-5D66-4D2B-BEE0-1C26F9987BC8@bitsofproof.com>

+X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6

+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)

+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.

+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

+X-Headers-End: 1Wce76-00024E-6d

+Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net

+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret

+ Sharing of Bitcoin private keys

+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net

+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9

+Precedence: list

+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>

+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>

+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>

+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>

+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>

+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>

+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:04:11 -0000

+

+What I was saying is that while it may or may not make sense to have

+separate prefixes for testnet, it makes no sense to have per-alt prefixes.

+

+On 04/22/2014 08:49 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:

+> I use several test chains while testing my software, the official test

+> net, a standalone net in house and even chains only created on the fly

+> for unit tests. I found no use of distinguishing serialization of keys

+> while using any of them.

+>

+> If you have some deep insights about why this is needed share it, as I

+> am not goint to guess your valuable thoughts.

+>

+> Regards,

+>

+> Tamas Blummer

+> http://bitsofproof.com

+>

+> On 22.04.2014, at 17:32, Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io

+> <mailto:mark@monetize.io>> wrote:

+>

+>> Testnet vs mainnet is quite a separate issue than bitcoin vs altcoin.

+>> Unfortunately few of the alts ever figured this out.

+>

+

+