diff options
| author | Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info> | 2015-08-20 21:30:37 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-21 01:30:47 +0000 |
| commit | 3686e71e6799354f4e495b177cef593778cfc35f (patch) | |
| tree | 017a2c65650501308c0dd6118120630e93d89fb2 | |
| parent | b90800cf9df04472d52b002c616f3b8176b39683 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-3686e71e6799354f4e495b177cef593778cfc35f.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-3686e71e6799354f4e495b177cef593778cfc35f.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
| -rw-r--r-- | f2/83d6e20ac52a8866545d7ad0b2abb334a7ba76 | 81 |
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/f2/83d6e20ac52a8866545d7ad0b2abb334a7ba76 b/f2/83d6e20ac52a8866545d7ad0b2abb334a7ba76 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a089870b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/f2/83d6e20ac52a8866545d7ad0b2abb334a7ba76 @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +Return-Path: <milly@bitcoins.info> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227A8847 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:30:47 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956E01AC + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:30:46 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA + ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:30:43 -0400 +References: <CAED3CWgTOMFgaM6bBfU0Dn-R0NrdrhGAQo34wHEneYkTtB4Opg@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEieSeSw04FYCCa-Df+V6BgJo1RHqPvJWt9t=c-JCC=dnhraWA@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDp0o5DBzuoyZ=SFvnBXTwPYFWhdOqUPkP_M_3koNMVP1g@mail.gmail.com> + <55D5AA8E.7070403@bitcoins.info> <55D67017.9000106@thinlink.com> + <55D674C1.6000102@bitcoins.info> <20150821005820.GA27305@muck> +From: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info> +To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Message-ID: <55D67F3D.5060101@bitcoins.info> +Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:30:37 -0400 +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 + Thunderbird/38.1.0 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +In-Reply-To: <20150821005820.GA27305@muck> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham + version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:30:47 -0000 + +Yes, I am familiar with the process as i spent years doing it. Many +here are familiar with the Bitcoin issues but they are not familiar with +addressing risk in a systematic way. There are many good posts but they +are dispersed among thousands of messages and the discussions are in a +variety of contexts. As a result, the same things are often argued over +and over and much time is wasted. Note that knowing a technical area +and knowing a process to analyze metrics are two different things. + +I am glad you want to participate in such a process. Several developers +on this list have mentioned the need for a decentralization metric so i +think that is a good place to start. I suggest getting the other +developers/experts together and send me the various into and tools you +have and I will put it together into a useable format. The idea is to +create a living document so people can discuss changes in a similar +context. + +Russ + + + + + + +On 8/20/2015 8:58 PM, Peter Todd wrote: +> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:45:53PM -0400, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> +> You know, I've noticed you've spent a tremendous amount of time and +> energy on this list promoting these kinds of metrics; obviously you're +> somewhat of an expert on this compared to the rest of us. +> +> Why don't you look into spearheading one of these analyses yourself to +> show us how it's done? + + + |