diff options
| author | Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net> | 2023-02-01 14:02:41 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2023-02-01 14:02:44 +0000 |
| commit | 35c3cde65cdf137468049c0318f44c8d7f796d93 (patch) | |
| tree | b1a8431aa4b35e0b419e902a132cc4abc26e0e84 | |
| parent | f3f2944cd1e55d757e989b78adf6b630b02cd574 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-35c3cde65cdf137468049c0318f44c8d7f796d93.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-35c3cde65cdf137468049c0318f44c8d7f796d93.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH
| -rw-r--r-- | b2/0994606d7541cc18ab056b7204b3181a4238ee | 128 |
1 files changed, 128 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b2/0994606d7541cc18ab056b7204b3181a4238ee b/b2/0994606d7541cc18ab056b7204b3181a4238ee new file mode 100644 index 000000000..554c4572c --- /dev/null +++ b/b2/0994606d7541cc18ab056b7204b3181a4238ee @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +Return-Path: <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net> +Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) + by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC11C002B + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:02:44 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD3F418EF + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:02:44 +0000 (UTC) +DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 3DD3F418EF +Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; + dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mail.wpsoftware.net + header.i=@mail.wpsoftware.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default + header.b=RA6Mc7Va +X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -1.107 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, + RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] + autolearn=no autolearn_force=no +Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id ccWU1qIvfioo + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:02:43 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 +DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 3572C416DE +Received: from mail.wpsoftware.net (unknown [66.183.0.205]) + by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3572C416DE + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:02:43 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from camus (camus-andrew.lan [192.168.0.190]) + by mail.wpsoftware.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F516400F1; + Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:02:42 +0000 (UTC) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.wpsoftware.net; + s=default; t=1675260162; + bh=tKdjItyoxV/RIyu+8rTd4Ep3kzs1ZphXqJR8HJYAQWI=; + h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; + b=RA6Mc7VaOFuDKqW9TS51XEGxrJca4Mo91C4/gc3qNgh5pLHIpIe2TwDfNiVQN4mQ1 + VOvfWEELe+hzBf5NyucPpTQVG+1uZWBr/S37nOTRTaxUk7/8Z6zEUcxNcDahM1MdRO + 6VWLYG6j0D3fiBGGAq5NgHt/h7iyBSTOkJD7zqxJ9hPTJjR5xYRB6zT0dcGhwox2wQ + ffn2TyIYIv6+pYqtZfhF/ve4oxGYc0BoFgeL0fcejjD66+gXAH8lY0m1yaY4yAjzrA + DdB5+CqHLZQCJfmnCmc5NERck1woDxDtqdHvcT+3NqS7WXSTHwFeGT5ZS+0przT2Yd + SGp/6lyu0Wqzw== +Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:02:41 +0000 +From: Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net> +To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Message-ID: <Y9pxAdm3kO1rr2kU@camus> +References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com> + <764E460B-C0C6-47B8-A97E-F7CBC81FD645@petertodd.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nWZB0gZ2X2UHlfwL" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <764E460B-C0C6-47B8-A97E-F7CBC81FD645@petertodd.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE + OP_IF OP_PUSH +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:02:44 -0000 + + +--nWZB0gZ2X2UHlfwL +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 09:07:16PM -0500, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: +>=20 +>=20 +> On January 31, 2023 7:46:32 PM EST, Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev <bi= +tcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +> >All other things being equal, which is better if you need to place a +> >64-bytes into the Bitcoin blockchain? A traditional OP_RETURN or a spent +> >taproot transaction such as: +> > +> >OP_FALSE +> >OP_IF +> >OP_PUSH my64bytes +> >OP_ENDIF +>=20 +> What's wrong with OpPush <data> OpDrop? +> + +This is a technical nit, but the reason is that <data> is limited to 520 +bytes (and I believe, 80 bytes by standardness in Taproot), so if you +are pushing a ton of data and need multiple pushes, it's more efficient +to use FALSE IF ... ENDIF since you avoid the repeated DROPs. + +--=20 +Andrew Poelstra +Director of Research, Blockstream +Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net +Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew + +The sun is always shining in space + -Justin Lewis-Webster + + +--nWZB0gZ2X2UHlfwL +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEkPnKPD7Je+ki35VexYjWPOQbl8EFAmPacPsACgkQxYjWPOQb +l8E2fgf9GfLkWMUmOj+C4fu//NkYwU4gfaD0sPhfOh4BYyDLuV+/ONvTFh8Bcy9d +F7slt/uFFcDu6BBFBydAwN7iXSWd9SLxG2ZmLZWKm2lG1UwF9NXC2jvUP+b0q6V0 +UPn8rsUX8JgQOMFUX2rnSY3EAOv/d3HrZwTuwavSrIfhRiS6UOJ3hQbEBxa7eKG7 +cKVHknyt3Q6dbe/m+H8eilt5g1C9wykjUjyQ/u4igKbJw4w4GlpBNlPi+GXnRyp0 +ZpAkmmVZW8BX4GnWWsc0Px53L3GfzAxPPIWpp/oPk410SiTO6EVRfCB0hWLzbgKS +vHRa7CTWt8+Hqa7m/T485ltq3g/FaQ== +=A61H +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--nWZB0gZ2X2UHlfwL-- + |