diff options
| author | Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com> | 2015-12-19 03:17:03 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-12-18 19:17:04 +0000 |
| commit | 3208d61c74a2eeb45b261c2f62dba8b5ec72bcad (patch) | |
| tree | e2d2d67db2984336c8837f6f16f691d52152b86a | |
| parent | 413724a24884324c58db7245e6383c6707661955 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-3208d61c74a2eeb45b261c2f62dba8b5ec72bcad.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-3208d61c74a2eeb45b261c2f62dba8b5ec72bcad.zip | |
[bitcoin-dev] The increase of max block size should be determined by block height instead of block time
| -rw-r--r-- | f0/0067407f10e7897bebf4ffc097cb85c75da89e | 61 |
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/f0/0067407f10e7897bebf4ffc097cb85c75da89e b/f0/0067407f10e7897bebf4ffc097cb85c75da89e new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ffb99b7ab --- /dev/null +++ b/f0/0067407f10e7897bebf4ffc097cb85c75da89e @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +Return-Path: <1240902@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77D3EF6 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:17:04 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com + [209.85.223.173]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70B0213C + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:17:04 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 186so101085459iow.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:17:04 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; + bh=negRT5iXg5VPonkY/V+EmKMU2NzywF7pDgUFljl0Cqw=; + b=JvgNR+t/8M6TKJDpvMy8YjWMg9kfuI+ifkVAKDHbMEDdULFcXPQ6Y1XvGqp9KOrzuK + ySuE0digdLQJtQelK6UzToFCVE66c+q3XA53ukUjhYxjACumQCIvt8iZoDTkNG3kEuqb + UFqjf0kS9qDh7Im6yvWyt3Gi8ObZwirV9o+ywaisBaQKqmcuj8ioKiR0HUSAoY/6rgEY + AqTe+tH5Abw+IjjRkJZIEaUpW6cs42gUgciIfUiAfjENqb3XwLq8FN2fh1+cho1rI/br + FdACScy9kyR/V6JmJlieIjglC5l6XhF0gaxXh1KtG0heJkOXTyYr7IeGRQymXJjsuGCJ + iF/A== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.107.167.78 with SMTP id q75mr7215818ioe.36.1450466223864; + Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:17:03 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.107.4.129 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:17:03 -0800 (PST) +Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 03:17:03 +0800 +Message-ID: <CAFzgq-xNZmWrdwCDv3twdsqSWk-FyMuLYJjZ_bA42_5Po0mgEg@mail.gmail.com> +From: Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com> +To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: [bitcoin-dev] The increase of max block size should be determined + by block height instead of block time +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:17:04 -0000 + +In many BIPs we have seen, include the latest BIP202, it is the block +time that determine the max block size. From from pool's point of +view, it cannot issue a job with a fixed ntime due to the existence of +ntime roll. It is hard to issue a job with the max block size unknown. +For developers, it is also easier to implement if max block size is a +function of block height instead of time. Block height is also much +more simple and elegant than time. + |