summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBtc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>2015-08-19 19:47:36 +0100
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-08-19 18:47:56 +0000
commit2f3eb660ccd266b07dcc5eea28796c00edcec5ea (patch)
tree04fbb8dc106076dd5daa79ac6ae2907418197911
parentb443f244c785bf608baee54d78a6e25f790b5c56 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-2f3eb660ccd266b07dcc5eea28796c00edcec5ea.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-2f3eb660ccd266b07dcc5eea28796c00edcec5ea.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Separated bitcoin-consensus mailing list (was Re: Bitcoin XT Fork)
-rw-r--r--c4/603b770a8d9c963000ba2b9ade9d31e52bf7b391
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/c4/603b770a8d9c963000ba2b9ade9d31e52bf7b3 b/c4/603b770a8d9c963000ba2b9ade9d31e52bf7b3
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7664d428d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c4/603b770a8d9c963000ba2b9ade9d31e52bf7b3
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC46919
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com
+ [209.85.223.181])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D5327C
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by iodb91 with SMTP id b91so19762638iod.1
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
+ :cc:content-type;
+ bh=zT6O6anbCNIIf3u3zoqyn+AVIwiOq5deOTGV5m5EvQQ=;
+ b=mu5dwl+/hrWmLKDAAKjVb2YeAHzXLjDycSVMfHEEXG+eduhEMf6MYr9rvCdQCg4cRU
+ kU/EzKmKRYX2eOPtZBqVHPXmKPsTOIAMBC+u4H75zLblqzO27gjyC92sBcB+M/joYr5k
+ 7cMkban/ycsiifHnZPwYb/x1BIqzXo6M9tn7MDSvjznatOZb1rPhoEyBtnDro3W2CuOx
+ NeAa/wdrTAZ+WBHrxAZu+Kozbke62jd/QZOR1n1mmZXmfO98hgpXW2h8lMNDF0l0OwHL
+ gPhLKki00Ato/ybl0wyHkJKnoKQRr13RQxw18YsBwuoHR9XhEEqO8Ymp0z8aACeBx97m
+ Ug6A==
+X-Received: by 10.107.148.8 with SMTP id w8mr17408803iod.116.1440010075745;
+ Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.79.81.199 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcYdWyeVhfvzbW=smqinCupTEvf7sz=ctU4ht+LssM3=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CABm2gDpYdBjyCB=Dor0eE-FdPv9PbVXzWyJf0BPyQ4SDm9VznQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CADJgMzsPT7n+favkjHSuWh1YGQPZQAFLyOgxu4wDNwXSa_-3og@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CADm_WcYdWyeVhfvzbW=smqinCupTEvf7sz=ctU4ht+LssM3=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
+Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:47:36 +0100
+Message-ID: <CADJgMzvCdHk1uo5T3rHyvpAYP1W95h7T+uMhA8vjg2BzEPzy2g@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
+ HK_RANDOM_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Separated bitcoin-consensus mailing list (was Re:
+ Bitcoin XT Fork)
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:47:56 -0000
+
+On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> wrote:
+> bitcoin-dev for protocol discussion and bitcoin-core for Bitcoin Core
+> discussion?
+
+Well -dev or both, I dont particularly see a difference at the moment,
+and establishing two lists isnt really going to make a difference so
+long as Bitcoin Core is the reference client, which it is by defacto.
+The risk of having too many lists is interested stakeholders will miss
+a discussions. Normal protocol and core discussions are usually pretty
+low volume in any case.
+
+> As Jorge notes, a general discussion list has existed for a long time with
+> little use.
+
+I would suggest it's only because there havent been any rules for -dev
+that would force general discussion over to the bitcoin list. On IRC
+we regularly tell people in #bitcoin-dev they are OT and ask them to
+move to #bitcoin and as a result, -dev remains quite clear of chit
+chat, #bitcoin has a steady stream of general chatter.
+
+We could reduce the OT/noise of bitcoin-dev list considerably by
+offloading the non-technical/academic debate to the bitcoin list. It
+just needs a bit of shepherding. I am more than happy to help out.
+Especially if the list already exists, we should consider making a
+decision now.
+
+Who are the moderators for that list? Do we really want to use
+sourceforge or are there alternatives, like another list on
+linuxfoundation?
+
+ping @Warren.
+