diff options
author | Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> | 2017-12-11 13:19:43 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2017-12-11 18:19:51 +0000 |
commit | 2d702badaf82d4d138271a8babfad169be48bf51 (patch) | |
tree | 7b63677f2b80ea4c97ebe119bef911a1164a2fbd | |
parent | d99e727d876319c3133b2933f4bb24479a3a808a (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-2d702badaf82d4d138271a8babfad169be48bf51.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-2d702badaf82d4d138271a8babfad169be48bf51.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-21 amendment proposal: -no125
-rw-r--r-- | 5d/c34e6d3e9c9508003ba1b206a7e11fbeccd0b5 | 121 |
1 files changed, 121 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/5d/c34e6d3e9c9508003ba1b206a7e11fbeccd0b5 b/5d/c34e6d3e9c9508003ba1b206a7e11fbeccd0b5 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6122f566e --- /dev/null +++ b/5d/c34e6d3e9c9508003ba1b206a7e11fbeccd0b5 @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2BBCBF + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:19:51 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from outmail148161.authsmtp.com (outmail148161.authsmtp.com + [62.13.148.161]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B35BD0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:19:50 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245]) + by punt22.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBBIJkw0021850; + Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:19:46 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org) +Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com + [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) + by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vBBIJiIT083939 + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); + Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:19:45 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org) +Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A88640188; + Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:19:43 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) + id 10A8320C85; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:19:43 -0500 (EST) +Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:19:43 -0500 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Message-ID: <20171211181943.GA9855@savin.petertodd.org> +References: <AE14915B-37DF-4D94-A0B1-E32A26903807@sprovoost.nl> + <201712051939.33238.luke@dashjr.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <201712051939.33238.luke@dashjr.org> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) +X-Server-Quench: dd899e04-de9f-11e7-9f3b-9cb654bb2504 +X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: + http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse +X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR + bgdMdwMUHFAXAgsB AmEbWlxeUVR7XWY7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq + T0pMXVMcUncaeGZY f3oeWhp7dAwIeX9y Y04sCiRTVU0vdUJg + FhtdQ3AHZDJndWlJ UxJFflAGdgZOLE1H b1B7GhFYa3VsNCMk + FAgyOXU9MCtqYA50 ekRXdBobREsNEjsx QQxKBS8oBUoeTiFh Z1kgLQdGQS4A +X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706 +X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) +X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 +X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own + anti-virus system. +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Matt Corallo <matt@chaincode.com> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-21 amendment proposal: -no125 +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:19:51 -0000 + + +--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:39:32PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> On Tuesday 05 December 2017 7:24:04 PM Sjors Provoost wrote: +> > I recently submitted a pull request that would turn on RBF by default, +> > which triggered some discussion [2]. To ease the transition for merchan= +ts +> > who are reluctant to see their customers use RBF, Matt Corallo suggested +> > that wallets honor a no125=3D1 flag. +> >=20 +> > So a BIP-21 URI would look like this: +> > bitcoin:175t...45W?amount=3D20.3&no125=3D1 +> >=20 +> > When this flag is set, wallets should not use RBF, regardless of their +> > default, unless the user explicitly overrides the merchant's preference. +>=20 +> This seems counterproductive. There is no reason to ever avoid the RBF fl= +ag.=20 +> I'm not aware of any evidence it even reduces risk of, and it certainly= +=20 +> doesn't prevent double spending. Plenty of miners allow RBF regardless of= + the=20 +> flag, and malicious double spending doesn't benefit much from RBF in any = +case. + +I'll second the objection to a no-RBF flag. + +--=20 +https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org + +--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJaLsw6AAoJECSBQD2l8JH7vjEH/Avdd65/GfHZuAq/ERJC3tTL +MlF/e2gGDQAjSVOgr4ar7aP1/qDEH3W3vBmv4904ZIndmiU/fiQm3MYR0k6VmpkW +aOoMwcQCXEwssiCGq+Cxfs6nqMQUBcIB+PTg+lzOtfyZFXabISAIluK/+3gzB6HD +igt5J1G8rm6ISWVoxJnhMsovtwF/5oAZgPh+e9LKRUoI8RQMU5GZkwaZOIiZrGda +eBf7e4TYLPOCD5054w6FMQeQJDRc6eubLMKn/Z4CC+Pr+uLn0KLE9s1Km0v5ml+P ++YhjnVySRuvzBAOe0XXOPIhCC90hcsJQl+CTYDzb5Vgb4WJop5U9+ZTSjIwTt+A= +=W3U7 +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- + |