diff options
| author | Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> | 2017-09-27 17:15:50 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2017-09-27 21:15:57 +0000 |
| commit | 2b2dc03d062f2848350146bd8f53a4f41d170b76 (patch) | |
| tree | fd91cb422a2e01eced116d2d60ee778e5b01c63d | |
| parent | 525185b660cb92610ef9fe44cc58f7df9dc2ce8a (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-2b2dc03d062f2848350146bd8f53a4f41d170b76.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-2b2dc03d062f2848350146bd8f53a4f41d170b76.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Address expiration times should be added to BIP-173
| -rw-r--r-- | 41/a23197451a263aaeba2c2bb763d4892712396f | 106 |
1 files changed, 106 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/41/a23197451a263aaeba2c2bb763d4892712396f b/41/a23197451a263aaeba2c2bb763d4892712396f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d7d659332 --- /dev/null +++ b/41/a23197451a263aaeba2c2bb763d4892712396f @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D09798A + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:15:57 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk + [62.13.149.82]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF571A6 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:15:55 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245]) + by punt20.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8RLFsMR001918; + Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:15:54 +0100 (BST) +Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com + [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) + by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8RLFpw1045086 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); + Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:15:52 +0100 (BST) +Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E47AB4011D; + Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:15:50 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) + id 341B9205E4; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:15:50 -0400 (EDT) +Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:15:50 -0400 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu> +Message-ID: <20170927211550.GA2034@savin.petertodd.org> +References: <20170927160654.GA12492@savin.petertodd.org> + <CAAcC9yvdw4Yphs-prpckaouzaU21D=kGRqK+gG9SbPr-=27z9w@mail.gmail.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <CAAcC9yvdw4Yphs-prpckaouzaU21D=kGRqK+gG9SbPr-=27z9w@mail.gmail.com> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) +X-Server-Quench: 0b043e63-a3c9-11e7-801f-9cb654bb2504 +X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: + http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse +X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR + aAdMdAUUC1AEAgsB AmEbWVZeUVh7XGE7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq + T0pMXVMcUg0KfWpB QR8eVhxyfwMIfHpy ZwhiDHBfXxF8dlss + QR1dCGwHMGB9YGAe Bl1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z + GA41ejw8IwAXAShZ WAwWNhofUV4KBDcg RhcEVSkuGEAeDz4z + KAEiJhYWEQ4YPkk/ PRM9XhoyEidXU1IF dwAA +X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706 +X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) +X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 +X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own + anti-virus system. +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Address expiration times should be added to + BIP-173 +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:15:57 -0000 + + +--ibTvN161/egqYuK8 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 01:35:33PM -0600, Chris Priest wrote: +> A better solution is to just have the sending wallet check to see if the +> address you are about to send to has been used before. If it's a fresh + +My concern is not primarily people re-using addresses, but rather people us= +ing +stale addresses that the recipient would rather not be used anymore. This +situation often happens even if the stale address has never been used. + +--=20 +https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org + +--ibTvN161/egqYuK8 +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZzBUBAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7baEIAKcV9M/nK9iqKPynbLRbumWA +iVpopa4o3xtEvQAZHaiZqziOVjO1Yb7htY0jzjYBJKfvZsIZeKWHel9d35/GUpZf +ufEgmgCj1XA0kASWJZxOSn+echoC6Jc2cMRCnZ3ZsAzUZEevBh7H/hKmq1hrAC8p +Um6ICsPL6tYcjGpC2uKeIsFluRBIXyg9WLuQMoOQFugAEVq1Kra31ZGvc65TYAID +q0o4zOt6gCDDyfMx7qcKr/WG/xwxYG0a2c7nVhAoJrEzm0KMinj2eH0lq25WscPp +oOlpHbPlw432W9ivvhquJ2l1dMg1E3G8USBqomDqZMl8/LjzE7ZHzeqWLWqj0xY= +=SiXd +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- + |