summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBtc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>2015-09-15 19:26:50 +0100
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-09-15 18:27:12 +0000
commit2311be99b0a95af9c0d3e2de274e2b45dfb5aa27 (patch)
tree3daec4cc1899c73f872aeddf95de1b97e3eb7a7e
parent6e16fb72c29055964fe3e92a719d5e2ee8494d75 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-2311be99b0a95af9c0d3e2de274e2b45dfb5aa27.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-2311be99b0a95af9c0d3e2de274e2b45dfb5aa27.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] libconsensus and bitcoin development process
-rw-r--r--c2/dba77b98a5142850940f05addea9c16891c39096
1 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/c2/dba77b98a5142850940f05addea9c16891c390 b/c2/dba77b98a5142850940f05addea9c16891c390
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dc8d34717
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c2/dba77b98a5142850940f05addea9c16891c390
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CF91184
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:27:12 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
+ [209.85.212.172])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4EE233F
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:27:11 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so41065696wic.1
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
+ :cc:content-type;
+ bh=cJVEPfaIb6JCQ6W54kzLogBKmcfi6d0ujFVI/eXcUJs=;
+ b=kNZfpCMugAH71Mo/y+X6+soVb31u9zSYKz+W3edUw653MotshYTU0dc90u/6GHiLyQ
+ kxCnU2/mKSrg4cysreiU4mlz/PM9n03zJ72g2JFMPisel58D6z7v6y0WXxro9mrXqRzv
+ pEEgmHBPFb2X8xLnazJ039AvF1VGlMbmKEwTHhLArtnfcaYVSMf383sfX4sI3f602mN+
+ MiNMbICwVgK5OYpC2LmBEZBhGLZ9HgoV9nrc/9sXBP8a4LiVjmVZvkPrtULCIOtdTkY7
+ eZM5ui6twkAt5nOvrJfi+VYcksi5MPcCCBSe5aJXMwQ3dpLKL0OXct5pu4GRad3VaIPs
+ P3Xg==
+X-Received: by 10.194.191.164 with SMTP id gz4mr42718549wjc.21.1442341630310;
+ Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.28.21.200 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcafXgg5xpQjE8uSfp-2y59XRaCUr9w5yNEoVo6GygYzZw@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CADm_WcY8Vy+k+5BaBS+jV6D6tmSXrok8rAxoPxxKOzUhyPWgMg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CADJgMzvSUTrPZa0mQvBsQaYkMN3NPXVB_Ay6RJNivq-agUoUww@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CADm_WcafXgg5xpQjE8uSfp-2y59XRaCUr9w5yNEoVo6GygYzZw@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
+Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:26:50 +0100
+Message-ID: <CADJgMzuha2mA7VgmtdgsYmK8c0121MiEi52nKMNB0VPqFYNk4g@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9821284ff4e051fcd54eb
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
+ HK_RANDOM_FROM,
+ HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] libconsensus and bitcoin development process
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:27:12 -0000
+
+--047d7ba9821284ff4e051fcd54eb
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+
+On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> wrote:
+
+> The problem comes with the impact of an unfocused stream of refactors to
+> key code.
+>
+> For example, there is much less long term developer impact if refactoring
+> were _accelerated_, scheduled to be performed in a one-week sprint. There
+> is a lot of breakage, yes, but after that week the average level of
+> downstream patch breakage is significantly lower. A "rip the band-aid off
+> quickly rather than slowly" approach.
+>
+
+My sentiments exactly...
+
+--047d7ba9821284ff4e051fcd54eb
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
+ue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Garzik <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"m=
+ailto:jgarzik@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">jgarzik@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>=
+ wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor=
+der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>The problem=
+ comes with the impact of an unfocused stream of refactors to key code.</di=
+v><div><br></div><div>For example, there is much less long term developer i=
+mpact if refactoring were _accelerated_, scheduled to be performed in a one=
+-week sprint.=C2=A0 There is a lot of breakage, yes, but after that week th=
+e average level of downstream patch breakage is significantly lower.=C2=A0 =
+A &quot;rip the band-aid off quickly rather than slowly&quot; approach.</di=
+v></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>My sentiments exactly...</div></di=
+v></div></div>
+
+--047d7ba9821284ff4e051fcd54eb--
+