diff options
author | Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> | 2015-09-15 19:26:50 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-09-15 18:27:12 +0000 |
commit | 2311be99b0a95af9c0d3e2de274e2b45dfb5aa27 (patch) | |
tree | 3daec4cc1899c73f872aeddf95de1b97e3eb7a7e | |
parent | 6e16fb72c29055964fe3e92a719d5e2ee8494d75 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-2311be99b0a95af9c0d3e2de274e2b45dfb5aa27.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-2311be99b0a95af9c0d3e2de274e2b45dfb5aa27.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] libconsensus and bitcoin development process
-rw-r--r-- | c2/dba77b98a5142850940f05addea9c16891c390 | 96 |
1 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/c2/dba77b98a5142850940f05addea9c16891c390 b/c2/dba77b98a5142850940f05addea9c16891c390 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dc8d34717 --- /dev/null +++ b/c2/dba77b98a5142850940f05addea9c16891c390 @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CF91184 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:27:12 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com + [209.85.212.172]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4EE233F + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:27:11 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so41065696wic.1 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:27:10 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=cJVEPfaIb6JCQ6W54kzLogBKmcfi6d0ujFVI/eXcUJs=; + b=kNZfpCMugAH71Mo/y+X6+soVb31u9zSYKz+W3edUw653MotshYTU0dc90u/6GHiLyQ + kxCnU2/mKSrg4cysreiU4mlz/PM9n03zJ72g2JFMPisel58D6z7v6y0WXxro9mrXqRzv + pEEgmHBPFb2X8xLnazJ039AvF1VGlMbmKEwTHhLArtnfcaYVSMf383sfX4sI3f602mN+ + MiNMbICwVgK5OYpC2LmBEZBhGLZ9HgoV9nrc/9sXBP8a4LiVjmVZvkPrtULCIOtdTkY7 + eZM5ui6twkAt5nOvrJfi+VYcksi5MPcCCBSe5aJXMwQ3dpLKL0OXct5pu4GRad3VaIPs + P3Xg== +X-Received: by 10.194.191.164 with SMTP id gz4mr42718549wjc.21.1442341630310; + Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:27:10 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.28.21.200 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:26:50 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcafXgg5xpQjE8uSfp-2y59XRaCUr9w5yNEoVo6GygYzZw@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CADm_WcY8Vy+k+5BaBS+jV6D6tmSXrok8rAxoPxxKOzUhyPWgMg@mail.gmail.com> + <CADJgMzvSUTrPZa0mQvBsQaYkMN3NPXVB_Ay6RJNivq-agUoUww@mail.gmail.com> + <CADm_WcafXgg5xpQjE8uSfp-2y59XRaCUr9w5yNEoVo6GygYzZw@mail.gmail.com> +From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> +Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:26:50 +0100 +Message-ID: <CADJgMzuha2mA7VgmtdgsYmK8c0121MiEi52nKMNB0VPqFYNk4g@mail.gmail.com> +To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9821284ff4e051fcd54eb +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, + HK_RANDOM_FROM, + HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] libconsensus and bitcoin development process +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:27:12 -0000 + +--047d7ba9821284ff4e051fcd54eb +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> wrote: + +> The problem comes with the impact of an unfocused stream of refactors to +> key code. +> +> For example, there is much less long term developer impact if refactoring +> were _accelerated_, scheduled to be performed in a one-week sprint. There +> is a lot of breakage, yes, but after that week the average level of +> downstream patch breakage is significantly lower. A "rip the band-aid off +> quickly rather than slowly" approach. +> + +My sentiments exactly... + +--047d7ba9821284ff4e051fcd54eb +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T= +ue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Garzik <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"m= +ailto:jgarzik@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">jgarzik@gmail.com</a>></span>= + wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor= +der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>The problem= + comes with the impact of an unfocused stream of refactors to key code.</di= +v><div><br></div><div>For example, there is much less long term developer i= +mpact if refactoring were _accelerated_, scheduled to be performed in a one= +-week sprint.=C2=A0 There is a lot of breakage, yes, but after that week th= +e average level of downstream patch breakage is significantly lower.=C2=A0 = +A "rip the band-aid off quickly rather than slowly" approach.</di= +v></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>My sentiments exactly...</div></di= +v></div></div> + +--047d7ba9821284ff4e051fcd54eb-- + |