diff options
author | Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com> | 2019-04-04 19:18:30 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2019-04-04 17:18:33 +0000 |
commit | 1e68ef9f046fb6046266e17bde574e692b338931 (patch) | |
tree | 4cf0a18fa38c2197f00c71f4fda32f377e246dd3 | |
parent | 6b5e7bf310e4faf07c6a33cff120a7c5f5442bc0 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-1e68ef9f046fb6046266e17bde574e692b338931.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-1e68ef9f046fb6046266e17bde574e692b338931.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Smart Contracts Unchained
-rw-r--r-- | 7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122 | 114 |
1 files changed, 114 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122 b/7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5c24b7e91 --- /dev/null +++ b/7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122 @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +Return-Path: <vitteaymeric@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1011BF5 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:18:33 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com + [209.85.128.46]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDD67A6 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:18:32 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id o25so3917113wmf.5 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; + h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version + :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; + bh=Gt85DYeQntqOMWrnM6/pCKEu6Rj3p6kda2kQklL3hTk=; + b=TR0OG5Rs2dgtrwnJXMLnvJCwPWNi/SC156Z+bz8WDoh23XSsd8V907T7kLOEU53UKA + kK2PkeSN3bWAlG8WWKNGqIh8q1lp+XSDMtN0ecpjttRRg8RqXYMp19KjFfQeMo1eJtWn + T+87VSBC36RGC4aJbO5ZowUosDyVXornl6v6YDoV70rA5gZO2KRw/SBAG0c99+ASM5jt + 3CoPEbkl5HFnFe6CXKVUdJzg7BeLbzyv9xS3HoP31kdX6AsXkifiYbui3EFviCf2pIck + Y3VTr6vyw4dnlMN4uBHHKP8GdKPT7fAShhj5ssFL7OiycvMyAXufxkYSNaIw3rSVBa7s + E4VA== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date + :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; + bh=Gt85DYeQntqOMWrnM6/pCKEu6Rj3p6kda2kQklL3hTk=; + b=p+XEXe2LXOZTtxQ9ktCfQfW69erWQxq2bZO+oALc14tIhyAi98RD088AIpxiMhPFsL + jhPokpd7pJP0stlX66vkWEJ+8joBLxI0oBuE8w9n91QleSqawtSq+mX3StVKvRUal12P + 08P52mUJBLzWyZ19bPyq46GOSa55Oo+Pu7aQZNZkqHOsPm25ZqsOsWAxFda1uFrUfQkv + W7lK+lAy3SlKdp0ZelNZxdVfl1WUNgLTaAfr/e2dop4LefJKFVRhDdTDw7gMSv/6bEUv + IQ/Yb8VSRey8b1f1Adqvu9kvIuOrUl2S2XOR4n2M40dQ23Iwo8FWeCeWuAjMA88pyDTg + /hwQ== +X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXlv9jQvSPwR0iS/7ZD7LGdORj949AGzMcTb5P3iaqabWBDlRWk + vuiyiXoBc8YJffbl/SL4MPULrONw +X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzuQNR93TGAJ6XiyrrSPJUh0JOGVGpV2Rb0FEiuXDanupCfcl8nWIIW+R97r6knZXBXsfhBpQ== +X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c054:: with SMTP id u20mr4957778wmc.100.1554398311129; + Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:31 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from [192.168.43.146] ([92.184.102.235]) + by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id + t74sm4557064wmt.3.2019.04.04.10.18.29 + (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:30 -0700 (PDT) +To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +References: <IAFPSZAn6TYt348fmmnPznQ_ApG7pa48eMjzTgrjuVAt6fS1tNieRxlcIXyTATy2vjZCUn4wVQcsyDlyb_3Ip46BstFRikB95-lKewAZBEE=@protonmail.com> +From: Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com> +Message-ID: <d1cfa2e9-69e4-ee02-4c10-23b2b1a30e00@gmail.com> +Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:18:30 +0200 +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 + Thunderbird/45.4.0 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +In-Reply-To: <IAFPSZAn6TYt348fmmnPznQ_ApG7pa48eMjzTgrjuVAt6fS1tNieRxlcIXyTATy2vjZCUn4wVQcsyDlyb_3Ip46BstFRikB95-lKewAZBEE=@protonmail.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URI_NOVOWEL + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 19:12:25 +0000 +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Smart Contracts Unchained +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 17:18:33 -0000 + +What if the smart contract platform(s) disappear? + +The proposal induces a very centralized system, to my knowledge all of +existing sidechains whether on bitcoin or ethereum are centralized, +except lightning (if we forget that someone must watch what others are +doing when you are on a trek in Nepal) + +Now I don't get why a sidechain should be a blockchain on top on another +one (given also that we can't consider bitcoin or ethereum as +decentralized today, so the path might be long for the sidechains...), +the latest is used to store the final state, the former does not have to +store forever the intermediate states, then it could just use a +decentralized system (not necessarilly blockchain-like) to store the +intermediate states and maybe be a distributed escrow + +I know, easy to say, please do it (why not), now the fact that +sidechains claim to be decentralized or that they will be is just +misleading people (that's not the case of your proposal but it does not +say what happens if the platforms go down) + + +Le 04/04/2019 � 03:55, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev a �crit : +> https://zmnscpxj.github.io/bitcoin/unchained.html +> +> Smart contracts have traditionally been implemented as part of the consensus rules of some blokchain. Often this means creating a new blockchain, or at least a sidechain to an existing blockchain. This writeup proposes an alternative method without launching a separate blockchain or sidechain, while achieving security similar to federated sidechains and additional benefits to privacy and smart-contract-patching. +> _______________________________________________ +> bitcoin-dev mailing list +> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev + +-- +Peersm : http://www.peersm.com +node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor +GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms + + |