summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com>2019-04-04 19:18:30 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2019-04-04 17:18:33 +0000
commit1e68ef9f046fb6046266e17bde574e692b338931 (patch)
tree4cf0a18fa38c2197f00c71f4fda32f377e246dd3
parent6b5e7bf310e4faf07c6a33cff120a7c5f5442bc0 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-1e68ef9f046fb6046266e17bde574e692b338931.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-1e68ef9f046fb6046266e17bde574e692b338931.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Smart Contracts Unchained
-rw-r--r--7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122114
1 files changed, 114 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122 b/7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5c24b7e91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+Return-Path: <vitteaymeric@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1011BF5
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:18:33 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com
+ [209.85.128.46])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDD67A6
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id o25so3917113wmf.5
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
+ h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
+ :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
+ bh=Gt85DYeQntqOMWrnM6/pCKEu6Rj3p6kda2kQklL3hTk=;
+ b=TR0OG5Rs2dgtrwnJXMLnvJCwPWNi/SC156Z+bz8WDoh23XSsd8V907T7kLOEU53UKA
+ kK2PkeSN3bWAlG8WWKNGqIh8q1lp+XSDMtN0ecpjttRRg8RqXYMp19KjFfQeMo1eJtWn
+ T+87VSBC36RGC4aJbO5ZowUosDyVXornl6v6YDoV70rA5gZO2KRw/SBAG0c99+ASM5jt
+ 3CoPEbkl5HFnFe6CXKVUdJzg7BeLbzyv9xS3HoP31kdX6AsXkifiYbui3EFviCf2pIck
+ Y3VTr6vyw4dnlMN4uBHHKP8GdKPT7fAShhj5ssFL7OiycvMyAXufxkYSNaIw3rSVBa7s
+ E4VA==
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
+ :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
+ bh=Gt85DYeQntqOMWrnM6/pCKEu6Rj3p6kda2kQklL3hTk=;
+ b=p+XEXe2LXOZTtxQ9ktCfQfW69erWQxq2bZO+oALc14tIhyAi98RD088AIpxiMhPFsL
+ jhPokpd7pJP0stlX66vkWEJ+8joBLxI0oBuE8w9n91QleSqawtSq+mX3StVKvRUal12P
+ 08P52mUJBLzWyZ19bPyq46GOSa55Oo+Pu7aQZNZkqHOsPm25ZqsOsWAxFda1uFrUfQkv
+ W7lK+lAy3SlKdp0ZelNZxdVfl1WUNgLTaAfr/e2dop4LefJKFVRhDdTDw7gMSv/6bEUv
+ IQ/Yb8VSRey8b1f1Adqvu9kvIuOrUl2S2XOR4n2M40dQ23Iwo8FWeCeWuAjMA88pyDTg
+ /hwQ==
+X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXlv9jQvSPwR0iS/7ZD7LGdORj949AGzMcTb5P3iaqabWBDlRWk
+ vuiyiXoBc8YJffbl/SL4MPULrONw
+X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzuQNR93TGAJ6XiyrrSPJUh0JOGVGpV2Rb0FEiuXDanupCfcl8nWIIW+R97r6knZXBXsfhBpQ==
+X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c054:: with SMTP id u20mr4957778wmc.100.1554398311129;
+ Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from [192.168.43.146] ([92.184.102.235])
+ by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
+ t74sm4557064wmt.3.2019.04.04.10.18.29
+ (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
+ Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
+To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>,
+ Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+References: <IAFPSZAn6TYt348fmmnPznQ_ApG7pa48eMjzTgrjuVAt6fS1tNieRxlcIXyTATy2vjZCUn4wVQcsyDlyb_3Ip46BstFRikB95-lKewAZBEE=@protonmail.com>
+From: Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com>
+Message-ID: <d1cfa2e9-69e4-ee02-4c10-23b2b1a30e00@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:18:30 +0200
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
+ Thunderbird/45.4.0
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+In-Reply-To: <IAFPSZAn6TYt348fmmnPznQ_ApG7pa48eMjzTgrjuVAt6fS1tNieRxlcIXyTATy2vjZCUn4wVQcsyDlyb_3Ip46BstFRikB95-lKewAZBEE=@protonmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URI_NOVOWEL
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 19:12:25 +0000
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Smart Contracts Unchained
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 17:18:33 -0000
+
+What if the smart contract platform(s) disappear?
+
+The proposal induces a very centralized system, to my knowledge all of
+existing sidechains whether on bitcoin or ethereum are centralized,
+except lightning (if we forget that someone must watch what others are
+doing when you are on a trek in Nepal)
+
+Now I don't get why a sidechain should be a blockchain on top on another
+one (given also that we can't consider bitcoin or ethereum as
+decentralized today, so the path might be long for the sidechains...),
+the latest is used to store the final state, the former does not have to
+store forever the intermediate states, then it could just use a
+decentralized system (not necessarilly blockchain-like) to store the
+intermediate states and maybe be a distributed escrow
+
+I know, easy to say, please do it (why not), now the fact that
+sidechains claim to be decentralized or that they will be is just
+misleading people (that's not the case of your proposal but it does not
+say what happens if the platforms go down)
+
+
+Le 04/04/2019 � 03:55, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev a �crit :
+> https://zmnscpxj.github.io/bitcoin/unchained.html
+>
+> Smart contracts have traditionally been implemented as part of the consensus rules of some blokchain. Often this means creating a new blockchain, or at least a sidechain to an existing blockchain. This writeup proposes an alternative method without launching a separate blockchain or sidechain, while achieving security similar to federated sidechains and additional benefits to privacy and smart-contract-patching.
+> _______________________________________________
+> bitcoin-dev mailing list
+> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
+
+--
+Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
+node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
+GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
+
+