diff options
author | Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> | 2016-06-21 18:19:40 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2016-06-21 22:19:50 +0000 |
commit | 171249522f49f0988b5da2c18ddeeedc8897264d (patch) | |
tree | 30060d0a9e7ab28d8e93907e97ede41e963ae356 | |
parent | 58f2e6c881a2f5cbd7efb9ff4ce88cf89f66fd89 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-171249522f49f0988b5da2c18ddeeedc8897264d.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-171249522f49f0988b5da2c18ddeeedc8897264d.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070
-rw-r--r-- | 39/1c8c34411f13ed93bafe133d2a026bb97b5a36 | 110 |
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/39/1c8c34411f13ed93bafe133d2a026bb97b5a36 b/39/1c8c34411f13ed93bafe133d2a026bb97b5a36 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e4597e4a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/39/1c8c34411f13ed93bafe133d2a026bb97b5a36 @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 131F6486 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:50 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from outmail148099.authsmtp.net (outmail148099.authsmtp.net + [62.13.148.99]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791B913A + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:49 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247]) + by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5LMJjCk015582; + Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:19:45 +0100 (BST) +Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com + [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) + by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5LMJfm2071709 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); + Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:19:42 +0100 (BST) +Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 044434010B; + Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) + id 628E920217; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:19:40 -0400 (EDT) +Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:19:40 -0400 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Message-ID: <20160621221940.GA10368@fedora-21-dvm> +References: <CAJowKg+zYtUnHv+ea--srehVa5K46sjpWbHVcVGRY5x0w5XRTQ@mail.gmail.com> + <201606212044.38931.luke@dashjr.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <201606212044.38931.luke@dashjr.org> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) +X-Server-Quench: 40bdcf74-37fe-11e6-bcde-0015176ca198 +X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: + http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse +X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR + aQdMdAMUEkAaAgsB AmAbWVdeUVR7XWE7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq + T0pMXVMcUQAUfGZX WxweVRh1dwwIfnZw ZAhmXiIPDxJ9cVt+ + RRgBCGwHMGF9OjNL BV1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z + GA41ejw8IwAXBTpY REkIKkgfCV4RGSY7 XB0OVR8OJQUIVzk+ + KQcnLVgHVFoWem8T CRN5AQ1AWwA8 +X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706 +X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) +X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 +X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own + anti-virus system. +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070 +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:50 -0000 + + +--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> X509 is entrenched, so it should remain supported. PGP might make sense f= +or=20 +> people already using it (it provides no real security for un-WoT-networke= +d=20 +> users), but unforunately, few people use it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but= + IIRC=20 +> Keybase uses blockchain spam, so definitely not something to be encourage= +d if=20 + +How else would you have keybase accomplish what they're accomplishing, with= + the +same security model? + +--=20 +https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org + +--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXab15AAoJEGOZARBE6K+yZpcH+gM60WaYMHWIK8HuBHZbWtdq +siZ86L5ZU5ElVjhL8zouiSFs9J2bvfg4sz6E+cisOA/qP388wp8cFvD25DtWKEuv +bprYxjaOQXxbxqvzjtC9RvWCAD5DTHwekM547lZRL9YIT3atjKj6sT0qveupUuC4 +tkH5O6RPUF8Im9jqAWVGMBlHU45Xjsx8pGVrI+U/7hWGActzVibJGedcIZTNtYVv +ljD6X+2i0bDEDwAUZSXckMAg4zeus7UIRwbdob/XD7pE38hUoQ/4i/twEEsi2DZ0 +h1xUWKHy2/dodfIzUu12AI3fbQoPA67fRvm5cHc+ysi+3q6bpNyg8Zioj9mq5jU= +=wlBC +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL-- + |