summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>2016-06-21 18:19:40 -0400
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2016-06-21 22:19:50 +0000
commit171249522f49f0988b5da2c18ddeeedc8897264d (patch)
tree30060d0a9e7ab28d8e93907e97ede41e963ae356
parent58f2e6c881a2f5cbd7efb9ff4ce88cf89f66fd89 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-171249522f49f0988b5da2c18ddeeedc8897264d.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-171249522f49f0988b5da2c18ddeeedc8897264d.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070
-rw-r--r--39/1c8c34411f13ed93bafe133d2a026bb97b5a36110
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/39/1c8c34411f13ed93bafe133d2a026bb97b5a36 b/39/1c8c34411f13ed93bafe133d2a026bb97b5a36
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e4597e4a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39/1c8c34411f13ed93bafe133d2a026bb97b5a36
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 131F6486
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:50 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from outmail148099.authsmtp.net (outmail148099.authsmtp.net
+ [62.13.148.99])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791B913A
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:49 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
+ by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5LMJjCk015582;
+ Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:19:45 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
+ [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
+ by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5LMJfm2071709
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
+ Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:19:42 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 044434010B;
+ Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
+ id 628E920217; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:19:40 -0400 (EDT)
+Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:19:40 -0400
+From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
+To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
+ Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Message-ID: <20160621221940.GA10368@fedora-21-dvm>
+References: <CAJowKg+zYtUnHv+ea--srehVa5K46sjpWbHVcVGRY5x0w5XRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <201606212044.38931.luke@dashjr.org>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL"
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <201606212044.38931.luke@dashjr.org>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
+X-Server-Quench: 40bdcf74-37fe-11e6-bcde-0015176ca198
+X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
+ http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
+X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
+ aQdMdAMUEkAaAgsB AmAbWVdeUVR7XWE7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
+ T0pMXVMcUQAUfGZX WxweVRh1dwwIfnZw ZAhmXiIPDxJ9cVt+
+ RRgBCGwHMGF9OjNL BV1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
+ GA41ejw8IwAXBTpY REkIKkgfCV4RGSY7 XB0OVR8OJQUIVzk+
+ KQcnLVgHVFoWem8T CRN5AQ1AWwA8
+X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
+X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
+X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
+X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
+ anti-virus system.
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:50 -0000
+
+
+--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
+> X509 is entrenched, so it should remain supported. PGP might make sense f=
+or=20
+> people already using it (it provides no real security for un-WoT-networke=
+d=20
+> users), but unforunately, few people use it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but=
+ IIRC=20
+> Keybase uses blockchain spam, so definitely not something to be encourage=
+d if=20
+
+How else would you have keybase accomplish what they're accomplishing, with=
+ the
+same security model?
+
+--=20
+https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
+
+--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+Content-Description: Digital signature
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXab15AAoJEGOZARBE6K+yZpcH+gM60WaYMHWIK8HuBHZbWtdq
+siZ86L5ZU5ElVjhL8zouiSFs9J2bvfg4sz6E+cisOA/qP388wp8cFvD25DtWKEuv
+bprYxjaOQXxbxqvzjtC9RvWCAD5DTHwekM547lZRL9YIT3atjKj6sT0qveupUuC4
+tkH5O6RPUF8Im9jqAWVGMBlHU45Xjsx8pGVrI+U/7hWGActzVibJGedcIZTNtYVv
+ljD6X+2i0bDEDwAUZSXckMAg4zeus7UIRwbdob/XD7pE38hUoQ/4i/twEEsi2DZ0
+h1xUWKHy2/dodfIzUu12AI3fbQoPA67fRvm5cHc+ysi+3q6bpNyg8Zioj9mq5jU=
+=wlBC
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--
+