diff options
| author | Tim Ruffing <crypto@timruffing.de> | 2021-03-20 11:08:30 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2021-03-20 10:17:01 +0000 |
| commit | 1373386803863e544a470a0df7d728db4befd40b (patch) | |
| tree | a8a42c87ef207105c1d7f853303262cf37f2ab7e | |
| parent | a9d81d631b2b1a290cda8ffaad66c8c6ad5bd0cd (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-1373386803863e544a470a0df7d728db4befd40b.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-1373386803863e544a470a0df7d728db4befd40b.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] An alternative to BIP 32?
| -rw-r--r-- | a8/d18c1ee2272eac0a55ef184aa2271ca3cbf1c6 | 92 |
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/a8/d18c1ee2272eac0a55ef184aa2271ca3cbf1c6 b/a8/d18c1ee2272eac0a55ef184aa2271ca3cbf1c6 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..24bebeeb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/a8/d18c1ee2272eac0a55ef184aa2271ca3cbf1c6 @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +Return-Path: <crypto@timruffing.de> +Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) + by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265C9C0001 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:17:01 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D5C40359 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:17:01 +0000 (UTC) +X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -2.101 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, + DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, + SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no +Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); + dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=timruffing.de +Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id P4x9Z1M3jCKl + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:16:59 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:22 by SQLgrey-1.8.0 +Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org + [IPv6:2001:67c:2050::465:201]) + by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8096F40355 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:16:59 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.241]) + (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) + key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest + SHA256) (No client certificate requested) + by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2c0f4C4gzQjwb; + Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:08:34 +0100 (CET) +X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=timruffing.de; + s=MBO0001; t=1616234912; + h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: + to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: + content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: + in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; + bh=TFjPo92f9l7/bJ8y59q0YPy3iIr+U7ogfA5S44HbYwA=; + b=lwbcuBnCcvuJv1oRn5k99LYvj8Nxp9Z/GNoqUPMN3KJW+6eTW10MfXcnM1tbKRY6OUkrtU + 9jpKI3xZPot41yb5k7BjqG7YRfx1BIQDoy96Nfoc8IpSLEUCq9/lNW7RcmtYigph+z917V + H5wtjw6wpQ1QD3iF/93r9MtDAf3D48xYBYVY7F0Y4OZIapoAuqZA4AN8buTFnG9FU+04NA + XFfwksPZKpVDVK8FsWmAHJsN9Xf8GcUnPuiFjv8Acoon8SCLm9sJV15RUdI5cDic1wsE/H + uPq7KkglMop/ZO5geN7609r+LjCQqG/eb4807RhrRmUeaXYds3DTWujVmQnHFg== +Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) + by spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de + [80.241.56.122]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) + with ESMTP id GTWDZiBxrZL8; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:08:31 +0100 (CET) +Message-ID: <62853a4db45c8c6a483fcb3ca05e0bb58e06a643.camel@timruffing.de> +From: Tim Ruffing <crypto@timruffing.de> +To: vjudeu <vjudeu@gazeta.pl>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion + <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:08:30 +0100 +In-Reply-To: <125859088-3f93e6aca40d5c3244243540270cdb84@pmq7v.m5r2.onet> +References: <125859088-3f93e6aca40d5c3244243540270cdb84@pmq7v.m5r2.onet> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-MBO-SPAM-Probability: * +X-Rspamd-Score: 0.16 / 15.00 / 15.00 +X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 82ED717E2 +X-Rspamd-UID: 45ee1a +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:50:38 +0000 +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] An alternative to BIP 32? +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:17:01 -0000 + +On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 20:46 +0100, vjudeu via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> is it safe enough to implement it and use in practice? + +This may be harsh but I can assure you that a HD wallet scheme that can +be specified in 3 lines (without even specifying what the security +goals are) should not be assumed safe to implement. + +Tim + + |