summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>2014-08-19 11:54:38 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2014-08-19 18:54:44 +0000
commit129987d9350ddfa6a90543653fcd08144eca5b10 (patch)
tree6f83679626d51fb046901778d332ac92af257e4b
parentec5a619b567e7bf551731e821e3d5ea7930dfc5d (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-129987d9350ddfa6a90543653fcd08144eca5b10.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-129987d9350ddfa6a90543653fcd08144eca5b10.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsidering github
-rw-r--r--66/329baebbf94ae20ba6598290ec63eff99853d575
1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/66/329baebbf94ae20ba6598290ec63eff99853d5 b/66/329baebbf94ae20ba6598290ec63eff99853d5
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dbde89baf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/66/329baebbf94ae20ba6598290ec63eff99853d5
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1XJoYO-0007Rn-Ub
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:54:44 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.213.180; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-ig0-f180.google.com;
+Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1XJoYN-0005jM-Um
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:54:44 +0000
+Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l13so10139078iga.7
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.50.80.39 with SMTP id o7mr23108422igx.0.1408474478595; Tue,
+ 19 Aug 2014 11:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.107.14.67 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAJHLa0NXAYh9HzazN6gArUV8y7J8_G0oqkZqPBgibpW0wRNxKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CAJHLa0NXAYh9HzazN6gArUV8y7J8_G0oqkZqPBgibpW0wRNxKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:54:38 -0700
+Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSpWWH5UkeQewtebjuhpT=S=gR36KzuSCoYb-Vw3MdNPg@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
+To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1XJoYN-0005jM-Um
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsidering github
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:54:45 -0000
+
+On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:
+> It would be nice if the issues and git repo for Bitcoin Core were not
+> on such a centralized service as github, nice and convenient as it is.
+>
+> To that end, I note that Linux does its own git repo, and now requires
+> 2FA: http://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/203-konstantin-ryabitsev/784544-linux-kernel-git-repositories-add-2-factor-authentication
+>
+> As a first step, one possibility is putting the primary repo on
+> bitcoin.org somewhere, and simply mirroring that to github for each
+> push.
+
+The obvious thing to do is setup the second repository and get it
+going. Git doesn't really care all that much whats "primary". If we
+have a working workflow elsewhere then making a change won't be a leap
+of faith.
+
+