summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>2014-06-25 07:43:23 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2014-06-25 05:43:31 +0000
commit12354a54eb41b67df033f4b78e29c63e1a9590b6 (patch)
tree2633e1ba47e72833796a948024e14a6b39d5fb89
parente8d3cf2863f38d5654743d011a7e34567b61ec64 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-12354a54eb41b67df033f4b78e29c63e1a9590b6.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-12354a54eb41b67df033f4b78e29c63e1a9590b6.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core
-rw-r--r--c0/e4a39c97fc2236cfc17ee484c9bda957224ca692
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/c0/e4a39c97fc2236cfc17ee484c9bda957224ca6 b/c0/e4a39c97fc2236cfc17ee484c9bda957224ca6
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c36b898ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c0/e4a39c97fc2236cfc17ee484c9bda957224ca6
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1WzfzX-0002BR-Bq
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-ig0-f175.google.com;
+Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175])
+ by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1WzfzV-0002Fo-Fa
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 +0000
+Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h3so5622442igd.14
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.50.134.135 with SMTP id pk7mr39990556igb.31.1403675003601;
+ Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.64.60.195 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAC1+kJPycskhv7m=ygEO1htryWRju4bdzWOFfZ3cEu_uKX2k2w@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CAC1+kJNjcPkaHiR8mzofwXE4+4UX5nmxX5Q3rZv37v-K40p1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CA+s+GJDVBQVu8yH9jLu_rQmk=dsJuMUctT-iK0zzOJRYgE8k9w@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAC1+kJOQ2uBo2peYKZJyPSQL6qzk6Yu-cF-tPs3GzVS6cAc53w@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CA+s+GJBT9u+LMqTfrTwUQrGbnrqj2u==1kmx17uQyY8899O8sw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <53A99A55.1020506@gmail.com>
+ <CAC1+kJPycskhv7m=ygEO1htryWRju4bdzWOFfZ3cEu_uKX2k2w@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:43:23 +0200
+Message-ID: <CA+s+GJCpUzasKD8KYbweTu25SyXAJAx31TmfYj2iHG2fN62AFA@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
+To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (laanwj[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1WzfzV-0002Fo-Fa
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 -0000
+
+On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@monetize.io> wrot=
+e:
+>
+> I think he means that the wallet shouldn't be running as much as it is
+> currently doing.
+> But yes, I think you're right about wallets and GUIs not necessarily
+> mapping 1:1.
+
+I haven't been talking about the GUI at all in this entire
+conversation. When I say wallet, I mean the wallet code. There are
+very few reasons for running a wallet 24/7. One could be if you're
+running an exchange that has to send and receive transactions all the
+time.
+
+But that's an exception - in the usual merchant/end-user case you're
+mostly receiving transactions and sometimes manually or batched-
+sending them. No need to leave the wallet running, exposed to the
+network outside those times.
+
+How the wallet GUI (if any) relates to the wallet code is a completely
+different topic, and a much less pressing matter. Anything from 'GUI
+uses wallet as a library' (multibit, electrum, bitcoin core) to
+elaborate client-server protocols (btcd, coinvault?) are acceptable
+depending on the use case.
+
+Wladimir
+
+