diff options
author | Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2014-06-25 07:43:23 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-06-25 05:43:31 +0000 |
commit | 12354a54eb41b67df033f4b78e29c63e1a9590b6 (patch) | |
tree | 2633e1ba47e72833796a948024e14a6b39d5fb89 | |
parent | e8d3cf2863f38d5654743d011a7e34567b61ec64 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-12354a54eb41b67df033f4b78e29c63e1a9590b6.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-12354a54eb41b67df033f4b78e29c63e1a9590b6.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core
-rw-r--r-- | c0/e4a39c97fc2236cfc17ee484c9bda957224ca6 | 92 |
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/c0/e4a39c97fc2236cfc17ee484c9bda957224ca6 b/c0/e4a39c97fc2236cfc17ee484c9bda957224ca6 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c36b898ba --- /dev/null +++ b/c0/e4a39c97fc2236cfc17ee484c9bda957224ca6 @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1WzfzX-0002BR-Bq + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; + helo=mail-ig0-f175.google.com; +Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1WzfzV-0002Fo-Fa + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 +0000 +Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h3so5622442igd.14 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.50.134.135 with SMTP id pk7mr39990556igb.31.1403675003601; + Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.64.60.195 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAC1+kJPycskhv7m=ygEO1htryWRju4bdzWOFfZ3cEu_uKX2k2w@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAC1+kJNjcPkaHiR8mzofwXE4+4UX5nmxX5Q3rZv37v-K40p1Tw@mail.gmail.com> + <CA+s+GJDVBQVu8yH9jLu_rQmk=dsJuMUctT-iK0zzOJRYgE8k9w@mail.gmail.com> + <CAC1+kJOQ2uBo2peYKZJyPSQL6qzk6Yu-cF-tPs3GzVS6cAc53w@mail.gmail.com> + <CA+s+GJBT9u+LMqTfrTwUQrGbnrqj2u==1kmx17uQyY8899O8sw@mail.gmail.com> + <53A99A55.1020506@gmail.com> + <CAC1+kJPycskhv7m=ygEO1htryWRju4bdzWOFfZ3cEu_uKX2k2w@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:43:23 +0200 +Message-ID: <CA+s+GJCpUzasKD8KYbweTu25SyXAJAx31TmfYj2iHG2fN62AFA@mail.gmail.com> +From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> +To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@monetize.io> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (laanwj[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1WzfzV-0002Fo-Fa +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 -0000 + +On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@monetize.io> wrot= +e: +> +> I think he means that the wallet shouldn't be running as much as it is +> currently doing. +> But yes, I think you're right about wallets and GUIs not necessarily +> mapping 1:1. + +I haven't been talking about the GUI at all in this entire +conversation. When I say wallet, I mean the wallet code. There are +very few reasons for running a wallet 24/7. One could be if you're +running an exchange that has to send and receive transactions all the +time. + +But that's an exception - in the usual merchant/end-user case you're +mostly receiving transactions and sometimes manually or batched- +sending them. No need to leave the wallet running, exposed to the +network outside those times. + +How the wallet GUI (if any) relates to the wallet code is a completely +different topic, and a much less pressing matter. Anything from 'GUI +uses wallet as a library' (multibit, electrum, bitcoin core) to +elaborate client-server protocols (btcd, coinvault?) are acceptable +depending on the use case. + +Wladimir + + |